Message ID | 1335539820-11232-6-git-send-email-jiang.liu@huawei.com |
---|---|
State | Superseded |
Headers | show |
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 11:16:46PM +0800, Jiang Liu wrote: > From: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@huawei.com> > > When destroying a PCIe hotplug controller, all work items associated with > that controller should be flushed. Function pcie_cleanup_slot() calls > cancel_delayed_work() and flush_workqueue() to achieve that. > Function flush_workqueue() will flush all work items already submitted, > but new work items submitted by those already submitted work items may > still be in live state when returning from flush_workqueue(). > > For the extreme case, pciehp driver may expierence following calling path: > 1) pcie_isr() -> pciehp_handle_xxx() -> queue_interrupt_event()->queue_work() > 2) interrupt_event_handler() -> handle_button_press_event() -> > queue_delayed_work() > 3) pciehp_queue_pushbutton_work() -> queue_work() > > So enhance pcie_cleanup_slot() to correctly flush workqueue when destroying > PCIe hotplug controller. > > Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <liuj97@gmail.com> > --- > drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_hpc.c | 14 +++++++++++++- > 1 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_hpc.c b/drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_hpc.c > index a960fae..98b775f 100644 > --- a/drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_hpc.c > +++ b/drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_hpc.c > @@ -889,8 +889,20 @@ static int pcie_init_slot(struct controller *ctrl) > static void pcie_cleanup_slot(struct controller *ctrl) > { > struct slot *slot = ctrl->slot; > - cancel_delayed_work(&slot->work); > + > + /* > + * Following workqueue flushing logic is to deal with the special > + * call path: > + * 1) pcie_isr() -> pciehp_handle_xxx() -> > + * queue_interrupt_event(pciehp_wq_event)->queue_work(pciehp_wq) > + * 2) interrupt_event_handler() -> handle_button_press_event() -> > + * queue_delayed_work(pciehp_wq) > + * 3) pciehp_queue_pushbutton_work() -> queue_work(pciehp_wq) > + */ > flush_workqueue(pciehp_wq); > + cancel_delayed_work_sync(&slot->work); > + flush_workqueue(pciehp_wq); Why just flush it twice? Why not three times? Like the magic "sync && sync && sync" invocation long typed by sysadmins. This really does not feel right, sorry. Odds are the whole workqueue path needs to be reworked here, right? greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff --git a/drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_hpc.c b/drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_hpc.c index a960fae..98b775f 100644 --- a/drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_hpc.c +++ b/drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_hpc.c @@ -889,8 +889,20 @@ static int pcie_init_slot(struct controller *ctrl) static void pcie_cleanup_slot(struct controller *ctrl) { struct slot *slot = ctrl->slot; - cancel_delayed_work(&slot->work); + + /* + * Following workqueue flushing logic is to deal with the special + * call path: + * 1) pcie_isr() -> pciehp_handle_xxx() -> + * queue_interrupt_event(pciehp_wq_event)->queue_work(pciehp_wq) + * 2) interrupt_event_handler() -> handle_button_press_event() -> + * queue_delayed_work(pciehp_wq) + * 3) pciehp_queue_pushbutton_work() -> queue_work(pciehp_wq) + */ flush_workqueue(pciehp_wq); + cancel_delayed_work_sync(&slot->work); + flush_workqueue(pciehp_wq); + kfree(slot); }