| Message ID | 20240823093323.33450-1-brgl@bgdev.pl |
|---|---|
| Headers | show |
| Series | PCI/pwrctl: fixes for v6.11 | expand |
On Fri, Aug 23, 2024 at 11:33 AM Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl> wrote: > > From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org> > > Bjorn, > > Here's a respin of the PCI/pwrctl fixes that should go into v6.11. I > eventually found a solution that doesn't require Krishna's topology > change but Krishna: please make sure to update the code in > drivers/pci/remove.c as well when rebasing your work once this gets > upstream. > > v2 -> v3: > - use the correct device for unregistering the platform pwrctl device in > patch 1/2 > - make patch 1/2 easier to read by using device_for_each_child() > > v1 -> v2: > - use the scoped variant of for_each_child_of_node() to fix a memory > leak in patch 1/2 > > Bartosz Golaszewski (2): > PCI: don't rely on of_platform_depopulate() for reused OF-nodes > PCI/pwrctl: put the bus rescan on a different thread > > drivers/pci/pwrctl/core.c | 26 +++++++++++++++++++++++--- > drivers/pci/pwrctl/pci-pwrctl-pwrseq.c | 2 +- > drivers/pci/remove.c | 18 +++++++++++++++++- > include/linux/pci-pwrctl.h | 3 +++ > 4 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > -- > 2.43.0 > Bjorn: gentle ping. Neither Rob nor Mani are opposed to these and it's getting close to release. Could you please pick them up? Bart
On Fri, Aug 23, 2024 at 11:33:21AM +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org> > > Bjorn, > > Here's a respin of the PCI/pwrctl fixes that should go into v6.11. I > eventually found a solution that doesn't require Krishna's topology > change but Krishna: please make sure to update the code in > drivers/pci/remove.c as well when rebasing your work once this gets > upstream. > > v2 -> v3: > - use the correct device for unregistering the platform pwrctl device in > patch 1/2 > - make patch 1/2 easier to read by using device_for_each_child() > > v1 -> v2: > - use the scoped variant of for_each_child_of_node() to fix a memory > leak in patch 1/2 > > Bartosz Golaszewski (2): > PCI: don't rely on of_platform_depopulate() for reused OF-nodes > PCI/pwrctl: put the bus rescan on a different thread > > drivers/pci/pwrctl/core.c | 26 +++++++++++++++++++++++--- > drivers/pci/pwrctl/pci-pwrctl-pwrseq.c | 2 +- > drivers/pci/remove.c | 18 +++++++++++++++++- > include/linux/pci-pwrctl.h | 3 +++ > 4 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) Applied to pci/for-linus for v6.11, thanks.
From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org> Bjorn, Here's a respin of the PCI/pwrctl fixes that should go into v6.11. I eventually found a solution that doesn't require Krishna's topology change but Krishna: please make sure to update the code in drivers/pci/remove.c as well when rebasing your work once this gets upstream. v2 -> v3: - use the correct device for unregistering the platform pwrctl device in patch 1/2 - make patch 1/2 easier to read by using device_for_each_child() v1 -> v2: - use the scoped variant of for_each_child_of_node() to fix a memory leak in patch 1/2 Bartosz Golaszewski (2): PCI: don't rely on of_platform_depopulate() for reused OF-nodes PCI/pwrctl: put the bus rescan on a different thread drivers/pci/pwrctl/core.c | 26 +++++++++++++++++++++++--- drivers/pci/pwrctl/pci-pwrctl-pwrseq.c | 2 +- drivers/pci/remove.c | 18 +++++++++++++++++- include/linux/pci-pwrctl.h | 3 +++ 4 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)