Message ID | CACRpkdaVOV4d9xeuKnMyfGgM+Su3M6dmo2pyeEQE9Qb2sErzzA@mail.gmail.com |
---|---|
State | Not Applicable |
Headers | show |
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 11:21:06PM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 6:36 PM, Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 11:36:59PM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote: > >> On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 10:31 PM, Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> wrote: > >> > >> > Would you mind rebasing on top of the depends/cleanup branch in arm-soc, sort > >> > out the breakage (and test it) and resubmit? > >> > >> So Olof, please try this instead, based on the ARM depends/cleanup HEAD > >> when I fetched it: > >> > >> The following changes since commit f8060f5446b1f2782f0a8ca9be2d870ea4198aee: > >> > >> Merge tag 'gic-vic-to-irqchip' of > >> git://sources.calxeda.com/kernel/linux into next/cleanup (2013-01-14 > >> 19:55:03 -0800) > >> > >> are available in the git repository at: > >> > >> > >> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/linusw/linux-nomadik.git > >> tags/nmk-dt-on-cleanups > > > > Beautiful! Pulled. Zero conflicts. :) > > So as I heard this blew up for selecting OF instead of USE_OF here > is yet another pull request, with this oneliner change in the relevant > patch ("ARM: nomadik: delete old board files"): > > - select OF > + select USE_OF > > I have tried to provoke builderrors with the defconfig but couldn't. > > Here is then yet another pull request, and let's hope it works this > time around: Dropping and replacing branches is awkward, and you rewrote history here. It'd be better to just take a fixup patch on top that switches the two selects. -Olof
On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 12:20 AM, Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> wrote: > On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 11:21:06PM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote: >> So as I heard this blew up for selecting OF instead of USE_OF here >> is yet another pull request, with this oneliner change in the relevant >> patch ("ARM: nomadik: delete old board files"): >> >> - select OF >> + select USE_OF >> >> I have tried to provoke builderrors with the defconfig but couldn't. >> >> Here is then yet another pull request, and let's hope it works this >> time around: > > Dropping and replacing branches is awkward, and you rewrote history here. It'd > be better to just take a fixup patch on top that switches the two selects. Sure, I'll fix... Yours, Linus Walleij