@@ -518,8 +518,12 @@ static int stm_lock(struct spi_nor *nor, loff_t ofs, uint64_t len)
status_new = (status_old & ~mask) | val;
+ /* Don't bother if they're the same */
+ if (status_new == status_old)
+ return 0;
+
/* Only modify protection if it will not unlock other areas */
- if ((status_new & mask) <= (status_old & mask))
+ if ((status_new & mask) < (status_old & mask))
return -EINVAL;
write_enable(nor);
@@ -576,8 +580,12 @@ static int stm_unlock(struct spi_nor *nor, loff_t ofs, uint64_t len)
status_new = (status_old & ~mask) | val;
+ /* Don't bother if they're the same */
+ if (status_new == status_old)
+ return 0;
+
/* Only modify protection if it will not lock other areas */
- if ((status_new & mask) >= (status_old & mask))
+ if ((status_new & mask) > (status_old & mask))
return -EINVAL;
write_enable(nor);
If, for instance, the entire flash is already unlocked and I try to mtd_unlock() the entire device, I don't expect to see an EINVAL error. It should just silently succeed. Ditto for mtd_lock(). Signed-off-by: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com> --- drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c | 12 ++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)