| Message ID | 001101c9222e$1914e6d0$3dd66c6b@sisodomain.com |
|---|---|
| State | Superseded |
| Headers | show |
Hi,
I have looked into the log file. I notice the oops in the log
file is the same i often meet with MLC nand after apply the patch
JFFS2 doesn't use OOB at MLC NAND/OneNAND from Kyungmin Park, it seems
that jffs2 file system may have serious issues. I have strong feeling
that jffs2 files system is far from production level at least for MLC
nand flash. David, do you have any comments?
2008/9/29 apgmoorthy <moorthy.apg@samsung.com>:
> Hi,
>
> In the earlier patch there was a typo , have rectified it and posting it
> back.
>
>
> Signed-off-by: Rajshekar H Payagond <rajshekar.hp@samsung.com>
> ---
> --- a/fs/jffs2/build.c 2008-09-16 20:48:12.000000000 +0530
> +++ b/fs/jffs2/build.c 2008-09-19 17:07:48.000000000 +0530
> @@ -330,7 +330,11 @@ int jffs2_do_mount_fs(struct jffs2_sb_in
> int i;
> int size;
>
> - c->free_size = c->flash_size;
> + if (c->mtd->flags == MTD_CAP_MLCNANDFLASH)
> + c->free_size = 0;
> + else
> + c->free_size = c->flash_size;
> +
> c->nr_blocks = c->flash_size / c->sector_size;
> size = sizeof(struct jffs2_eraseblock) * c->nr_blocks; #ifndef
> __ECOS @@ -346,7 +350,14 @@ int jffs2_do_mount_fs(struct jffs2_sb_in
> for (i=0; i<c->nr_blocks; i++) {
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&c->blocks[i].list);
> c->blocks[i].offset = i * c->sector_size;
> - c->blocks[i].free_size = c->sector_size;
> + if (c->mtd->flags == MTD_CAP_MLCNANDFLASH) {
> + c->blocks[i].free_size =
> + c->sector_size - c->wbuf_pagesize;
> + c->blocks[i].used_size = c->wbuf_pagesize;
> + c->free_size += c->blocks[i].free_size;
> + c->used_size += c->blocks[i].used_size;
> + } else
> + c->blocks[i].free_size = c->sector_size;
> }
>
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&c->clean_list);
> --- a/fs/jffs2/debug.c 2008-09-16 20:48:12.000000000 +0530
> +++ b/fs/jffs2/debug.c 2008-09-19 17:07:48.000000000 +0530
> @@ -307,6 +307,9 @@ __jffs2_dbg_acct_paranoia_check_nolock(s
> uint32_t my_dirty_size = 0;
> struct jffs2_raw_node_ref *ref2 = jeb->first_node;
>
> + if (c->mtd->flags == MTD_CAP_MLCNANDFLASH)
> + my_used_size = c->wbuf_pagesize;
> +
> while (ref2) {
> uint32_t totlen = ref_totlen(c, jeb, ref2);
>
> --- a/fs/jffs2/erase.c 2008-09-16 20:48:12.000000000 +0530
> +++ b/fs/jffs2/erase.c 2008-09-19 17:07:48.000000000 +0530
> @@ -454,13 +454,21 @@ static void jffs2_mark_erased_block(stru
> }
> }
> /* Everything else got zeroed before the erase */
> - jeb->free_size = c->sector_size;
> + if (c->mtd->flags == MTD_CAP_MLCNANDFLASH) {
> + jeb->free_size = c->sector_size - c->wbuf_pagesize;
> + jeb->used_size = c->wbuf_pagesize;
> + } else
> + jeb->free_size = c->sector_size;
>
> mutex_lock(&c->erase_free_sem);
> spin_lock(&c->erase_completion_lock);
>
> c->erasing_size -= c->sector_size;
> - c->free_size += c->sector_size;
> + if (c->mtd->flags == MTD_CAP_MLCNANDFLASH) {
> + c->free_size += c->sector_size - c->wbuf_pagesize;
> + c->used_size += c->wbuf_pagesize;
> + } else
> + c->free_size += c->sector_size;
>
> /* Account for cleanmarker now, if it's in-band */
> if (c->cleanmarker_size && !jffs2_cleanmarker_oob(c))
> --- a/fs/jffs2/gc.c 2008-09-16 20:48:12.000000000 +0530
> +++ b/fs/jffs2/gc.c 2008-09-23 21:36:56.000000000 +0530
> @@ -237,9 +237,17 @@ int jffs2_garbage_collect_pass(struct jf
> D1(if (c->nextblock)
> printk(KERN_DEBUG "Nextblock at %08x, used_size %08x, dirty_size
> %08x, wasted_size %08x, free_size %08x\n", c->nextblock->offset,
> c->nextblock->used_size, c->nextblock->dirty_size,
> c->nextblock->wasted_size, c->nextblock->free_size));
>
> - if (!jeb->used_size) {
> - mutex_unlock(&c->alloc_sem);
> - goto eraseit;
> + if (c->mtd->flags == MTD_CAP_MLCNANDFLASH) {
> + if (jeb->used_size <= c->wbuf_pagesize) {
> + mutex_unlock(&c->alloc_sem);
> + goto eraseit;
> + }
> +
> + } else{
> + if (!jeb->used_size) {
> + mutex_unlock(&c->alloc_sem);
> + goto eraseit;
> + }
> }
>
> raw = jeb->gc_node;
> @@ -429,13 +437,30 @@ int jffs2_garbage_collect_pass(struct jf
> spin_lock(&c->erase_completion_lock);
>
> eraseit:
> - if (c->gcblock && !c->gcblock->used_size) {
> - D1(printk(KERN_DEBUG "Block at 0x%08x completely obsoleted
> by GC. Moving to erase_pending_list\n", c->gcblock->offset));
> - /* We're GC'ing an empty block? */
> - list_add_tail(&c->gcblock->list, &c->erase_pending_list);
> - c->gcblock = NULL;
> - c->nr_erasing_blocks++;
> - jffs2_erase_pending_trigger(c);
> + if (c->mtd->flags == MTD_CAP_MLCNANDFLASH) {
> + if (c->gcblock && (c->gcblock->used_size <=
> c->wbuf_pagesize)) {
> + D1(printk(KERN_DEBUG "Block at 0x%08x completely"
> + " obsoleted by GC. Moving to
> erase_pending_list\n"
> + , c->gcblock->offset));
> + /* We're GC'ing an empty block? */
> + list_add_tail(&c->gcblock->list,
> + &c->erase_pending_list);
> + c->gcblock = NULL;
> + c->nr_erasing_blocks++;
> + jffs2_erase_pending_trigger(c);
> + }
> + } else{
> + if (c->gcblock && !c->gcblock->used_size) {
> + D1(printk(KERN_DEBUG "Block at 0x%08x completely"
> + " obsoleted by GC. Moving to
> erase_pending_list\n"
> + , c->gcblock->offset));
> + /* We're GC'ing an empty block? */
> + list_add_tail(&c->gcblock->list,
> + &c->erase_pending_list);
> + c->gcblock = NULL;
> + c->nr_erasing_blocks++;
> + jffs2_erase_pending_trigger(c);
> + }
> }
> spin_unlock(&c->erase_completion_lock);
>
> --- a/fs/jffs2/nodelist.c 2008-09-16 20:48:12.000000000 +0530
> +++ b/fs/jffs2/nodelist.c 2008-09-19 17:07:48.000000000 +0530
> @@ -634,7 +634,11 @@ struct jffs2_raw_node_ref *jffs2_link_no
>
> if (!jeb->first_node) {
> jeb->first_node = ref;
> - BUG_ON(ref_offset(ref) != jeb->offset);
> + if (c->mtd->flags == MTD_CAP_MLCNANDFLASH)
> + BUG_ON(ref_offset(ref) !=
> + jeb->offset +
> c->wbuf_pagesize);
> + else
> + BUG_ON(ref_offset(ref) != jeb->offset);
> } else if (unlikely(ref_offset(ref) != jeb->offset + c->sector_size
> - jeb->free_size)) {
> uint32_t last_len = ref_totlen(c, jeb, jeb->last_node);
>
> --- a/fs/jffs2/nodemgmt.c 2008-09-16 20:48:12.000000000 +0530
> +++ b/fs/jffs2/nodemgmt.c 2008-09-19 17:07:48.000000000 +0530
> @@ -362,16 +362,25 @@ static int jffs2_do_reserve_space(struct
> }
>
> if (!jeb) {
> -
> ret = jffs2_find_nextblock(c);
> if (ret)
> return ret;
>
> jeb = c->nextblock;
> + if (c->mtd->flags == MTD_CAP_MLCNANDFLASH) {
> + if (jeb->free_size != c->sector_size -
> + c->cleanmarker_size - c->wbuf_pagesize) {
> + printk(KERN_WARNING "Eep. Block 0x%08x taken
> from free_list had free_size of 0x%08x!!\n", jeb->offset, jeb->free_size);
> + goto restart;
> + }
> + }
>
> - if (jeb->free_size != c->sector_size - c->cleanmarker_size)
> {
> - printk(KERN_WARNING "Eep. Block 0x%08x taken from
> free_list had free_size of 0x%08x!!\n", jeb->offset, jeb->free_size);
> - goto restart;
> + else{
> + if (jeb->free_size != c->sector_size -
> + c->cleanmarker_size) {
> + printk(KERN_WARNING "Eep. Block 0x%08x taken
> from free_list had free_size of 0x%08x!!\n", jeb->offset, jeb->free_size);
> + goto restart;
> + }
> }
> }
> /* OK, jeb (==c->nextblock) is now pointing at a block which
> definitely has
> --- a/fs/jffs2/scan.c 2008-09-16 20:48:12.000000000 +0530
> +++ b/fs/jffs2/scan.c 2008-09-19 17:07:48.000000000 +0530
> @@ -534,7 +534,10 @@ static int jffs2_scan_eraseblock (struct
> }
> }
>
> - buf_ofs = jeb->offset;
> + if (c->mtd->flags == MTD_CAP_MLCNANDFLASH)
> + buf_ofs = jeb->offset + c->wbuf_pagesize;
> + else
> + buf_ofs = jeb->offset;
>
> if (!buf_size) {
> /* This is the XIP case -- we're reading _directly_ from the
> flash chip */ @@ -582,7 +585,10 @@ static int jffs2_scan_eraseblock (struct
> }
>
> /* Now ofs is a complete physical flash offset as it always was...
> */
> - ofs += jeb->offset;
> + if (c->mtd->flags == MTD_CAP_MLCNANDFLASH)
> + ofs += jeb->offset + c->wbuf_pagesize;
> + else
> + ofs += jeb->offset;
>
> noise = 10;
>
> --- a/fs/jffs2/wbuf.c 2008-09-16 20:48:12.000000000 +0530
> +++ b/fs/jffs2/wbuf.c 2008-09-19 17:07:48.000000000 +0530
> @@ -873,6 +873,13 @@ int jffs2_flash_writev(struct jffs2_sb_i
> vlen -= wbuf_retlen;
> outvec_to += wbuf_retlen;
> c->wbuf_ofs = outvec_to;
> + if (c->mtd->flags == MTD_CAP_MLCNANDFLASH) {
> + /* adjust write buffer offset,
> + * else we get a non contiguous write bug
> + */
> + if (!(c->wbuf_ofs % c->sector_size))
> + c->wbuf_ofs = 0xffffffff;
> + }
> donelen += wbuf_retlen;
> v += wbuf_retlen;
> }
> --- a/include/mtd/mtd-abi.h 2008-09-16 20:48:12.000000000 +0530
> +++ b/include/mtd/mtd-abi.h 2008-09-23 22:09:18.000000000 +0530
> @@ -28,12 +28,14 @@ struct mtd_oob_buf {
> #define MTD_BIT_WRITEABLE 0x800 /* Single bits can be flipped */
> #define MTD_NO_ERASE 0x1000 /* No erase necessary */
> #define MTD_POWERUP_LOCK 0x2000 /* Always locked after reset */
> +#define MTD_OOB_WRITEABLE 0x4000
>
> // Some common devices / combinations of capabilities
> #define MTD_CAP_ROM 0
> #define MTD_CAP_RAM (MTD_WRITEABLE | MTD_BIT_WRITEABLE |
> MTD_NO_ERASE)
> #define MTD_CAP_NORFLASH (MTD_WRITEABLE | MTD_BIT_WRITEABLE)
> #define MTD_CAP_NANDFLASH (MTD_WRITEABLE | MTD_OOB_WRITEABLE)
> +#define MTD_CAP_MLCNANDFLASH (MTD_WRITEABLE)
>
> /* ECC byte placement */
> #define MTD_NANDECC_OFF 0 // Switch off ECC (Not
> recommended)
>
>
> ______________________________________________________
> Linux MTD discussion mailing list
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/
>
We are also facing many difficulty in robustness and reliability test with Jffs2 not only this we have tested our MLC patches on kernel 2.6.22 their Jffs2 stability was little bit higher as compare to 2.6.27 , not only this LTP file tests and rw test fails with Jffs2 and same driver works fine with yaffs2 but yaffs2 also has issue with Symlink operation we are working for that. Rgs Amit ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jason Liu" <liu.h.jason@gmail.com> To: "apgmoorthy" <moorthy.apg@samsung.com> Cc: <linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>; "Kyungmin Park" <kmpark@infradead.org>; <David.Woodhouse@intel.com> Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2008 5:37 PM Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] [MTD] [JFFS2] MLC NAND support > Hi, > I have looked into the log file. I notice the oops in > the log > file is the same i often meet with MLC nand after apply > the patch > JFFS2 doesn't use OOB at MLC NAND/OneNAND from Kyungmin > Park, it seems > that jffs2 file system may have serious issues. I have > strong feeling > that jffs2 files system is far from production level at > least for MLC > nand flash. David, do you have any comments? > > 2008/9/29 apgmoorthy <moorthy.apg@samsung.com>: >> Hi, >> >> In the earlier patch there was a typo , have rectified it >> and posting it >> back. >> >> >> Signed-off-by: Rajshekar H Payagond >> <rajshekar.hp@samsung.com> >> --- >> --- a/fs/jffs2/build.c 2008-09-16 20:48:12.000000000 >> +0530 >> +++ b/fs/jffs2/build.c 2008-09-19 17:07:48.000000000 >> +0530 >> @@ -330,7 +330,11 @@ int jffs2_do_mount_fs(struct >> jffs2_sb_in >> int i; >> int size; >> >> - c->free_size = c->flash_size; >> + if (c->mtd->flags == MTD_CAP_MLCNANDFLASH) >> + c->free_size = 0; >> + else >> + c->free_size = c->flash_size; >> + >> c->nr_blocks = c->flash_size / c->sector_size; >> size = sizeof(struct jffs2_eraseblock) * >> c->nr_blocks; #ifndef >> __ECOS @@ -346,7 +350,14 @@ int jffs2_do_mount_fs(struct >> jffs2_sb_in >> for (i=0; i<c->nr_blocks; i++) { >> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&c->blocks[i].list); >> c->blocks[i].offset = i * c->sector_size; >> - c->blocks[i].free_size = c->sector_size; >> + if (c->mtd->flags == >> MTD_CAP_MLCNANDFLASH) { >> + c->blocks[i].free_size = >> + c->sector_size - >> c->wbuf_pagesize; >> + c->blocks[i].used_size = >> c->wbuf_pagesize; >> + c->free_size += >> c->blocks[i].free_size; >> + c->used_size += >> c->blocks[i].used_size; >> + } else >> + c->blocks[i].free_size = >> c->sector_size; >> } >> >> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&c->clean_list); >> --- a/fs/jffs2/debug.c 2008-09-16 20:48:12.000000000 >> +0530 >> +++ b/fs/jffs2/debug.c 2008-09-19 17:07:48.000000000 >> +0530 >> @@ -307,6 +307,9 @@ >> __jffs2_dbg_acct_paranoia_check_nolock(s >> uint32_t my_dirty_size = 0; >> struct jffs2_raw_node_ref *ref2 = jeb->first_node; >> >> + if (c->mtd->flags == MTD_CAP_MLCNANDFLASH) >> + my_used_size = c->wbuf_pagesize; >> + >> while (ref2) { >> uint32_t totlen = ref_totlen(c, jeb, >> ref2); >> >> --- a/fs/jffs2/erase.c 2008-09-16 20:48:12.000000000 >> +0530 >> +++ b/fs/jffs2/erase.c 2008-09-19 17:07:48.000000000 >> +0530 >> @@ -454,13 +454,21 @@ static void >> jffs2_mark_erased_block(stru >> } >> } >> /* Everything else got zeroed before the erase */ >> - jeb->free_size = c->sector_size; >> + if (c->mtd->flags == MTD_CAP_MLCNANDFLASH) { >> + jeb->free_size = c->sector_size - >> c->wbuf_pagesize; >> + jeb->used_size = c->wbuf_pagesize; >> + } else >> + jeb->free_size = c->sector_size; >> >> mutex_lock(&c->erase_free_sem); >> spin_lock(&c->erase_completion_lock); >> >> c->erasing_size -= c->sector_size; >> - c->free_size += c->sector_size; >> + if (c->mtd->flags == MTD_CAP_MLCNANDFLASH) { >> + c->free_size += c->sector_size - >> c->wbuf_pagesize; >> + c->used_size += c->wbuf_pagesize; >> + } else >> + c->free_size += c->sector_size; >> >> /* Account for cleanmarker now, if it's in-band */ >> if (c->cleanmarker_size && >> !jffs2_cleanmarker_oob(c)) >> --- a/fs/jffs2/gc.c 2008-09-16 20:48:12.000000000 >> +0530 >> +++ b/fs/jffs2/gc.c 2008-09-23 21:36:56.000000000 >> +0530 >> @@ -237,9 +237,17 @@ int >> jffs2_garbage_collect_pass(struct jf >> D1(if (c->nextblock) >> printk(KERN_DEBUG "Nextblock at %08x, >> used_size %08x, dirty_size >> %08x, wasted_size %08x, free_size %08x\n", >> c->nextblock->offset, >> c->nextblock->used_size, c->nextblock->dirty_size, >> c->nextblock->wasted_size, c->nextblock->free_size)); >> >> - if (!jeb->used_size) { >> - mutex_unlock(&c->alloc_sem); >> - goto eraseit; >> + if (c->mtd->flags == MTD_CAP_MLCNANDFLASH) { >> + if (jeb->used_size <= c->wbuf_pagesize) { >> + mutex_unlock(&c->alloc_sem); >> + goto eraseit; >> + } >> + >> + } else{ >> + if (!jeb->used_size) { >> + mutex_unlock(&c->alloc_sem); >> + goto eraseit; >> + } >> } >> >> raw = jeb->gc_node; >> @@ -429,13 +437,30 @@ int >> jffs2_garbage_collect_pass(struct jf >> spin_lock(&c->erase_completion_lock); >> >> eraseit: >> - if (c->gcblock && !c->gcblock->used_size) { >> - D1(printk(KERN_DEBUG "Block at 0x%08x >> completely obsoleted >> by GC. Moving to erase_pending_list\n", >> c->gcblock->offset)); >> - /* We're GC'ing an empty block? */ >> - list_add_tail(&c->gcblock->list, >> &c->erase_pending_list); >> - c->gcblock = NULL; >> - c->nr_erasing_blocks++; >> - jffs2_erase_pending_trigger(c); >> + if (c->mtd->flags == MTD_CAP_MLCNANDFLASH) { >> + if (c->gcblock && (c->gcblock->used_size >> <= >> c->wbuf_pagesize)) { >> + D1(printk(KERN_DEBUG "Block at >> 0x%08x completely" >> + " obsoleted by GC. Moving >> to >> erase_pending_list\n" >> + , c->gcblock->offset)); >> + /* We're GC'ing an empty block? >> */ >> + list_add_tail(&c->gcblock->list, >> + >> &c->erase_pending_list); >> + c->gcblock = NULL; >> + c->nr_erasing_blocks++; >> + jffs2_erase_pending_trigger(c); >> + } >> + } else{ >> + if (c->gcblock && !c->gcblock->used_size) >> { >> + D1(printk(KERN_DEBUG "Block at >> 0x%08x completely" >> + " obsoleted by GC. Moving >> to >> erase_pending_list\n" >> + , c->gcblock->offset)); >> + /* We're GC'ing an empty block? >> */ >> + list_add_tail(&c->gcblock->list, >> + >> &c->erase_pending_list); >> + c->gcblock = NULL; >> + c->nr_erasing_blocks++; >> + jffs2_erase_pending_trigger(c); >> + } >> } >> spin_unlock(&c->erase_completion_lock); >> >> --- a/fs/jffs2/nodelist.c 2008-09-16 >> 20:48:12.000000000 +0530 >> +++ b/fs/jffs2/nodelist.c 2008-09-19 >> 17:07:48.000000000 +0530 >> @@ -634,7 +634,11 @@ struct jffs2_raw_node_ref >> *jffs2_link_no >> >> if (!jeb->first_node) { >> jeb->first_node = ref; >> - BUG_ON(ref_offset(ref) != jeb->offset); >> + if (c->mtd->flags == >> MTD_CAP_MLCNANDFLASH) >> + BUG_ON(ref_offset(ref) != >> + >> jeb->offset + >> c->wbuf_pagesize); >> + else >> + BUG_ON(ref_offset(ref) != >> jeb->offset); >> } else if (unlikely(ref_offset(ref) != jeb->offset >> + c->sector_size >> - jeb->free_size)) { >> uint32_t last_len = ref_totlen(c, jeb, >> jeb->last_node); >> >> --- a/fs/jffs2/nodemgmt.c 2008-09-16 >> 20:48:12.000000000 +0530 >> +++ b/fs/jffs2/nodemgmt.c 2008-09-19 >> 17:07:48.000000000 +0530 >> @@ -362,16 +362,25 @@ static int >> jffs2_do_reserve_space(struct >> } >> >> if (!jeb) { >> - >> ret = jffs2_find_nextblock(c); >> if (ret) >> return ret; >> >> jeb = c->nextblock; >> + if (c->mtd->flags == >> MTD_CAP_MLCNANDFLASH) { >> + if (jeb->free_size != >> c->sector_size - >> + c->cleanmarker_size - >> c->wbuf_pagesize) { >> + printk(KERN_WARNING "Eep. >> Block 0x%08x taken >> from free_list had free_size of 0x%08x!!\n", jeb->offset, >> jeb->free_size); >> + goto restart; >> + } >> + } >> >> - if (jeb->free_size != c->sector_size - >> c->cleanmarker_size) >> { >> - printk(KERN_WARNING "Eep. Block >> 0x%08x taken from >> free_list had free_size of 0x%08x!!\n", jeb->offset, >> jeb->free_size); >> - goto restart; >> + else{ >> + if (jeb->free_size != >> c->sector_size - >> + >> c->cleanmarker_size) { >> + printk(KERN_WARNING "Eep. >> Block 0x%08x taken >> from free_list had free_size of 0x%08x!!\n", jeb->offset, >> jeb->free_size); >> + goto restart; >> + } >> } >> } >> /* OK, jeb (==c->nextblock) is now pointing at a >> block which >> definitely has >> --- a/fs/jffs2/scan.c 2008-09-16 20:48:12.000000000 >> +0530 >> +++ b/fs/jffs2/scan.c 2008-09-19 17:07:48.000000000 >> +0530 >> @@ -534,7 +534,10 @@ static int jffs2_scan_eraseblock >> (struct >> } >> } >> >> - buf_ofs = jeb->offset; >> + if (c->mtd->flags == MTD_CAP_MLCNANDFLASH) >> + buf_ofs = jeb->offset + c->wbuf_pagesize; >> + else >> + buf_ofs = jeb->offset; >> >> if (!buf_size) { >> /* This is the XIP case -- we're reading >> _directly_ from the >> flash chip */ @@ -582,7 +585,10 @@ static int >> jffs2_scan_eraseblock (struct >> } >> >> /* Now ofs is a complete physical flash offset as >> it always was... >> */ >> - ofs += jeb->offset; >> + if (c->mtd->flags == MTD_CAP_MLCNANDFLASH) >> + ofs += jeb->offset + c->wbuf_pagesize; >> + else >> + ofs += jeb->offset; >> >> noise = 10; >> >> --- a/fs/jffs2/wbuf.c 2008-09-16 20:48:12.000000000 >> +0530 >> +++ b/fs/jffs2/wbuf.c 2008-09-19 17:07:48.000000000 >> +0530 >> @@ -873,6 +873,13 @@ int jffs2_flash_writev(struct >> jffs2_sb_i >> vlen -= wbuf_retlen; >> outvec_to += wbuf_retlen; >> c->wbuf_ofs = outvec_to; >> + if (c->mtd->flags == >> MTD_CAP_MLCNANDFLASH) { >> + /* adjust write buffer >> offset, >> + * else we get a non >> contiguous write bug >> + */ >> + if (!(c->wbuf_ofs % >> c->sector_size)) >> + c->wbuf_ofs = >> 0xffffffff; >> + } >> donelen += wbuf_retlen; >> v += wbuf_retlen; >> } >> --- a/include/mtd/mtd-abi.h 2008-09-16 >> 20:48:12.000000000 +0530 >> +++ b/include/mtd/mtd-abi.h 2008-09-23 >> 22:09:18.000000000 +0530 >> @@ -28,12 +28,14 @@ struct mtd_oob_buf { >> #define MTD_BIT_WRITEABLE 0x800 /* Single bits >> can be flipped */ >> #define MTD_NO_ERASE 0x1000 /* No erase >> necessary */ >> #define MTD_POWERUP_LOCK 0x2000 /* Always locked >> after reset */ >> +#define MTD_OOB_WRITEABLE 0x4000 >> >> // Some common devices / combinations of capabilities >> #define MTD_CAP_ROM 0 >> #define MTD_CAP_RAM (MTD_WRITEABLE | >> MTD_BIT_WRITEABLE | >> MTD_NO_ERASE) >> #define MTD_CAP_NORFLASH (MTD_WRITEABLE | >> MTD_BIT_WRITEABLE) >> #define MTD_CAP_NANDFLASH (MTD_WRITEABLE | >> MTD_OOB_WRITEABLE) >> +#define MTD_CAP_MLCNANDFLASH (MTD_WRITEABLE) >> >> /* ECC byte placement */ >> #define MTD_NANDECC_OFF 0 // Switch >> off ECC (Not >> recommended) >> >> >> ______________________________________________________ >> Linux MTD discussion mailing list >> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/ >> > > ______________________________________________________ > Linux MTD discussion mailing list > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/
Hi, On Wed, 2008-10-01 at 09:07 +0530, Amit Kumar Sharma wrote: > We are also facing many difficulty in robustness and > reliability test with Jffs2 not only this we have tested our > MLC patches on kernel 2.6.22 their Jffs2 stability was > little bit higher as compare to 2.6.27 , not only this LTP > file tests and rw test fails with Jffs2 and same driver > works fine with yaffs2 but yaffs2 also has issue with > Symlink operation we are working for that. Have you tries UBIFS?
no we have started working for UBIFS , very soon we will start working for UBIFS , let u know results. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Artem Bityutskiy" <dedekind@infradead.org> To: "Amit Kumar Sharma" <amitsharma.9@samsung.com> Cc: "Jason Liu" <liu.h.jason@gmail.com>; "apgmoorthy" <moorthy.apg@samsung.com>; "Kyungmin Park" <kmpark@infradead.org>; <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>; <linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org> Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2008 11:22 AM Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] [MTD] [JFFS2] MLC NAND support > Hi, > > On Wed, 2008-10-01 at 09:07 +0530, Amit Kumar Sharma > wrote: >> We are also facing many difficulty in robustness and >> reliability test with Jffs2 not only this we have tested >> our >> MLC patches on kernel 2.6.22 their Jffs2 stability was >> little bit higher as compare to 2.6.27 , not only this >> LTP >> file tests and rw test fails with Jffs2 and same driver >> works fine with yaffs2 but yaffs2 also has issue with >> Symlink operation we are working for that. > > Have you tries UBIFS? > > -- > Best regards, > Artem Bityutskiy (???????? ?????) > > > ______________________________________________________ > Linux MTD discussion mailing list > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/ >
On Wed, 2008-10-01 at 15:14 +0530, Amit Kumar Sharma wrote: > no we have started working for UBIFS , very soon we will > start working for UBIFS , let u know results. Note, JFFS2 is not really suitable for MLC because it has random wear-leveling algorithm, and it may erase one eraseblock thousands of times, while erasing the other eraseblock only hundreds of times. In UBI you may set the WL threshold to control this. Also, JFFS2 does not really help with read-disturb problem, but this is fixable. UBI refreshes data when it meets a bit-flip. However, UBIFS is not really ready to handle this paired page problem. I mean, in MLC, if you interrupt power during write operation, this may result in corruptions in one of the previous NAND page. The only simple way to fix this is to make UBIFS assume that min. I/O unit size is not one NAND page, but several pages, so that both paired NAND pages were in one min. I/O unit.
Thanks Artem for pre information , your information I hope will be useful for us and we will consider your points during UBIFS with OneNAND-FlexOneNAND. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Artem Bityutskiy" <dedekind@infradead.org> To: "Amit Kumar Sharma" <amitsharma.9@samsung.com> Cc: "Jason Liu" <liu.h.jason@gmail.com>; "apgmoorthy" <moorthy.apg@samsung.com>; "Kyungmin Park" <kmpark@infradead.org>; <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>; <linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org> Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2008 3:22 PM Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] [MTD] [JFFS2] MLC NAND support > > On Wed, 2008-10-01 at 15:14 +0530, Amit Kumar Sharma > wrote: >> no we have started working for UBIFS , very soon we will >> start working for UBIFS , let u know results. > > Note, JFFS2 is not really suitable for MLC because it has > random wear-leveling algorithm, and it may erase one > eraseblock > thousands of times, while erasing the other eraseblock > only hundreds of > times. > > In UBI you may set the WL threshold to control this. Also, > JFFS2 > does not really help with read-disturb problem, but this > is fixable. > > UBI refreshes data when it meets a bit-flip. > > However, UBIFS is not really ready to handle this paired > page problem. > I mean, in MLC, if you interrupt power during write > operation, this > may result in corruptions in one of the previous NAND > page. The only > simple way to fix this is to make UBIFS assume that min. > I/O unit size > is not one NAND page, but several pages, so that both > paired NAND pages > were in one min. I/O unit. > > -- > Best regards, > Artem Bityutskiy (???????? ?????) > > > ______________________________________________________ > Linux MTD discussion mailing list > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/ >
--- a/fs/jffs2/build.c 2008-09-16 20:48:12.000000000 +0530 +++ b/fs/jffs2/build.c 2008-09-19 17:07:48.000000000 +0530 @@ -330,7 +330,11 @@ int jffs2_do_mount_fs(struct jffs2_sb_in int i; int size; - c->free_size = c->flash_size; + if (c->mtd->flags == MTD_CAP_MLCNANDFLASH) + c->free_size = 0; + else + c->free_size = c->flash_size; + c->nr_blocks = c->flash_size / c->sector_size; size = sizeof(struct jffs2_eraseblock) * c->nr_blocks; #ifndef __ECOS @@ -346,7 +350,14 @@ int jffs2_do_mount_fs(struct jffs2_sb_in for (i=0; i<c->nr_blocks; i++) { INIT_LIST_HEAD(&c->blocks[i].list); c->blocks[i].offset = i * c->sector_size; - c->blocks[i].free_size = c->sector_size; + if (c->mtd->flags == MTD_CAP_MLCNANDFLASH) { + c->blocks[i].free_size = + c->sector_size - c->wbuf_pagesize; + c->blocks[i].used_size = c->wbuf_pagesize; + c->free_size += c->blocks[i].free_size; + c->used_size += c->blocks[i].used_size; + } else + c->blocks[i].free_size = c->sector_size; } INIT_LIST_HEAD(&c->clean_list); --- a/fs/jffs2/debug.c 2008-09-16 20:48:12.000000000 +0530 +++ b/fs/jffs2/debug.c 2008-09-19 17:07:48.000000000 +0530 @@ -307,6 +307,9 @@ __jffs2_dbg_acct_paranoia_check_nolock(s uint32_t my_dirty_size = 0; struct jffs2_raw_node_ref *ref2 = jeb->first_node; + if (c->mtd->flags == MTD_CAP_MLCNANDFLASH) + my_used_size = c->wbuf_pagesize; + while (ref2) { uint32_t totlen = ref_totlen(c, jeb, ref2); --- a/fs/jffs2/erase.c 2008-09-16 20:48:12.000000000 +0530 +++ b/fs/jffs2/erase.c 2008-09-19 17:07:48.000000000 +0530 @@ -454,13 +454,21 @@ static void jffs2_mark_erased_block(stru } } /* Everything else got zeroed before the erase */ - jeb->free_size = c->sector_size; + if (c->mtd->flags == MTD_CAP_MLCNANDFLASH) { + jeb->free_size = c->sector_size - c->wbuf_pagesize; + jeb->used_size = c->wbuf_pagesize; + } else + jeb->free_size = c->sector_size; mutex_lock(&c->erase_free_sem); spin_lock(&c->erase_completion_lock); c->erasing_size -= c->sector_size; - c->free_size += c->sector_size; + if (c->mtd->flags == MTD_CAP_MLCNANDFLASH) { + c->free_size += c->sector_size - c->wbuf_pagesize; + c->used_size += c->wbuf_pagesize; + } else + c->free_size += c->sector_size; /* Account for cleanmarker now, if it's in-band */ if (c->cleanmarker_size && !jffs2_cleanmarker_oob(c)) --- a/fs/jffs2/gc.c 2008-09-16 20:48:12.000000000 +0530 +++ b/fs/jffs2/gc.c 2008-09-23 21:36:56.000000000 +0530 @@ -237,9 +237,17 @@ int jffs2_garbage_collect_pass(struct jf D1(if (c->nextblock) printk(KERN_DEBUG "Nextblock at %08x, used_size %08x, dirty_size %08x, wasted_size %08x, free_size %08x\n", c->nextblock->offset, c->nextblock->used_size, c->nextblock->dirty_size, c->nextblock->wasted_size, c->nextblock->free_size)); - if (!jeb->used_size) { - mutex_unlock(&c->alloc_sem); - goto eraseit; + if (c->mtd->flags == MTD_CAP_MLCNANDFLASH) { + if (jeb->used_size <= c->wbuf_pagesize) { + mutex_unlock(&c->alloc_sem); + goto eraseit; + } + + } else{ + if (!jeb->used_size) { + mutex_unlock(&c->alloc_sem); + goto eraseit; + } } raw = jeb->gc_node; @@ -429,13 +437,30 @@ int jffs2_garbage_collect_pass(struct jf spin_lock(&c->erase_completion_lock); eraseit: - if (c->gcblock && !c->gcblock->used_size) { - D1(printk(KERN_DEBUG "Block at 0x%08x completely obsoleted by GC. Moving to erase_pending_list\n", c->gcblock->offset)); - /* We're GC'ing an empty block? */ - list_add_tail(&c->gcblock->list, &c->erase_pending_list); - c->gcblock = NULL; - c->nr_erasing_blocks++; - jffs2_erase_pending_trigger(c); + if (c->mtd->flags == MTD_CAP_MLCNANDFLASH) { + if (c->gcblock && (c->gcblock->used_size <= c->wbuf_pagesize)) { + D1(printk(KERN_DEBUG "Block at 0x%08x completely" + " obsoleted by GC. Moving to erase_pending_list\n" + , c->gcblock->offset)); + /* We're GC'ing an empty block? */ + list_add_tail(&c->gcblock->list, + &c->erase_pending_list); + c->gcblock = NULL; + c->nr_erasing_blocks++; + jffs2_erase_pending_trigger(c); + } + } else{ + if (c->gcblock && !c->gcblock->used_size) { + D1(printk(KERN_DEBUG "Block at 0x%08x completely" + " obsoleted by GC. Moving to erase_pending_list\n" + , c->gcblock->offset)); + /* We're GC'ing an empty block? */ + list_add_tail(&c->gcblock->list, + &c->erase_pending_list); + c->gcblock = NULL; + c->nr_erasing_blocks++; + jffs2_erase_pending_trigger(c); + } } spin_unlock(&c->erase_completion_lock); --- a/fs/jffs2/nodelist.c 2008-09-16 20:48:12.000000000 +0530 +++ b/fs/jffs2/nodelist.c 2008-09-19 17:07:48.000000000 +0530 @@ -634,7 +634,11 @@ struct jffs2_raw_node_ref *jffs2_link_no if (!jeb->first_node) { jeb->first_node = ref; - BUG_ON(ref_offset(ref) != jeb->offset); + if (c->mtd->flags == MTD_CAP_MLCNANDFLASH) + BUG_ON(ref_offset(ref) != + jeb->offset + c->wbuf_pagesize); + else + BUG_ON(ref_offset(ref) != jeb->offset); } else if (unlikely(ref_offset(ref) != jeb->offset + c->sector_size - jeb->free_size)) { uint32_t last_len = ref_totlen(c, jeb, jeb->last_node); --- a/fs/jffs2/nodemgmt.c 2008-09-16 20:48:12.000000000 +0530 +++ b/fs/jffs2/nodemgmt.c 2008-09-19 17:07:48.000000000 +0530 @@ -362,16 +362,25 @@ static int jffs2_do_reserve_space(struct } if (!jeb) { - ret = jffs2_find_nextblock(c); if (ret) return ret; jeb = c->nextblock; + if (c->mtd->flags == MTD_CAP_MLCNANDFLASH) { + if (jeb->free_size != c->sector_size - + c->cleanmarker_size - c->wbuf_pagesize) { + printk(KERN_WARNING "Eep. Block 0x%08x taken from free_list had free_size of 0x%08x!!\n", jeb->offset, jeb->free_size); + goto restart; + } + } - if (jeb->free_size != c->sector_size - c->cleanmarker_size) { - printk(KERN_WARNING "Eep. Block 0x%08x taken from free_list had free_size of 0x%08x!!\n", jeb->offset, jeb->free_size); - goto restart; + else{ + if (jeb->free_size != c->sector_size - + c->cleanmarker_size) { + printk(KERN_WARNING "Eep. Block 0x%08x taken from free_list had free_size of 0x%08x!!\n", jeb->offset, jeb->free_size); + goto restart; + } } } /* OK, jeb (==c->nextblock) is now pointing at a block which definitely has --- a/fs/jffs2/scan.c 2008-09-16 20:48:12.000000000 +0530 +++ b/fs/jffs2/scan.c 2008-09-19 17:07:48.000000000 +0530 @@ -534,7 +534,10 @@ static int jffs2_scan_eraseblock (struct } } - buf_ofs = jeb->offset; + if (c->mtd->flags == MTD_CAP_MLCNANDFLASH) + buf_ofs = jeb->offset + c->wbuf_pagesize; + else + buf_ofs = jeb->offset; if (!buf_size) { /* This is the XIP case -- we're reading _directly_ from the flash chip */ @@ -582,7 +585,10 @@ static int jffs2_scan_eraseblock (struct } /* Now ofs is a complete physical flash offset as it always was... */ - ofs += jeb->offset; + if (c->mtd->flags == MTD_CAP_MLCNANDFLASH) + ofs += jeb->offset + c->wbuf_pagesize; + else + ofs += jeb->offset; noise = 10; --- a/fs/jffs2/wbuf.c 2008-09-16 20:48:12.000000000 +0530 +++ b/fs/jffs2/wbuf.c 2008-09-19 17:07:48.000000000 +0530 @@ -873,6 +873,13 @@ int jffs2_flash_writev(struct jffs2_sb_i vlen -= wbuf_retlen; outvec_to += wbuf_retlen; c->wbuf_ofs = outvec_to; + if (c->mtd->flags == MTD_CAP_MLCNANDFLASH) { + /* adjust write buffer offset, + * else we get a non contiguous write bug + */ + if (!(c->wbuf_ofs % c->sector_size)) + c->wbuf_ofs = 0xffffffff; + } donelen += wbuf_retlen; v += wbuf_retlen; } --- a/include/mtd/mtd-abi.h 2008-09-16 20:48:12.000000000 +0530 +++ b/include/mtd/mtd-abi.h 2008-09-23 22:09:18.000000000 +0530 @@ -28,12 +28,14 @@ struct mtd_oob_buf { #define MTD_BIT_WRITEABLE 0x800 /* Single bits can be flipped */ #define MTD_NO_ERASE 0x1000 /* No erase necessary */ #define MTD_POWERUP_LOCK 0x2000 /* Always locked after reset */ +#define MTD_OOB_WRITEABLE 0x4000 // Some common devices / combinations of capabilities #define MTD_CAP_ROM 0 #define MTD_CAP_RAM (MTD_WRITEABLE | MTD_BIT_WRITEABLE | MTD_NO_ERASE) #define MTD_CAP_NORFLASH (MTD_WRITEABLE | MTD_BIT_WRITEABLE) #define MTD_CAP_NANDFLASH (MTD_WRITEABLE | MTD_OOB_WRITEABLE) +#define MTD_CAP_MLCNANDFLASH (MTD_WRITEABLE) /* ECC byte placement */
Hi, In the earlier patch there was a typo , have rectified it and posting it back. Signed-off-by: Rajshekar H Payagond <rajshekar.hp@samsung.com> --- #define MTD_NANDECC_OFF 0 // Switch off ECC (Not recommended)