Message ID | cover.1442478814.git.horms+renesas@verge.net.au |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
Now that the only multiplatform boot is supported for all shmobile platforms Makefile.boot may be removed. This seems correct to me given: * Setting MACHINE to no value in arch/arm/Makefile if CONFIG_ARCH_MULTIPLATFORM is set * Not including Makefile.boot in arch/arm/boot/Makefile if MACHINE has no value Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <horms+renesas@verge.net.au> Acked-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be> --- arch/arm/mach-shmobile/Makefile.boot | 0 1 file changed, 0 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 arch/arm/mach-shmobile/Makefile.boot diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/Makefile.boot b/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/Makefile.boot deleted file mode 100644 index e69de29bb2d1..000000000000
Hi Arnd, On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 3:58 PM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote: > On Thursday 17 September 2015 17:59:33 Simon Horman wrote: >> Please consider these Renesas ARM based SoC cleanup for v4.4. >> >> 24 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2687 deletions(-) >> >> Is a pleasing diffstat if I do say so myself. >> >> Of particular note the last legacy board code for Renesas ARM based SoCs, >> that of the bockw board, is removed in this pull request. > > After a long delay in response, I've merged it now into next/cleanup. > > So the transition is complete and you beat me with the multiplatform > conversion that I have pending for the other ARMv7 platforms, nice work! Thanks for pulling! Now I can start out sending my platform data removal series... > I've used the opportunity to look for any remaining code that you may > have missed, by tracking symbols that are defined globally but never used > in mach-shmobile, and didn't find much (which is good). > > Could you have a look at the patch below and integrate the parts that > make sense to you? I think most of this has already been fixed in Simon's next branch in the mean time. Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds
On Tuesday 06 October 2015 17:47:37 Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > Hi Arnd, > > On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 3:58 PM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote: > > On Thursday 17 September 2015 17:59:33 Simon Horman wrote: > >> Please consider these Renesas ARM based SoC cleanup for v4.4. > >> > >> 24 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2687 deletions(-) > >> > >> Is a pleasing diffstat if I do say so myself. > >> > >> Of particular note the last legacy board code for Renesas ARM based SoCs, > >> that of the bockw board, is removed in this pull request. > > > > After a long delay in response, I've merged it now into next/cleanup. > > > > So the transition is complete and you beat me with the multiplatform > > conversion that I have pending for the other ARMv7 platforms, nice work! > > Thanks for pulling! > > Now I can start out sending my platform data removal series... Ok, cool. I don't think that there is generally a need to wait before sending stuff out that depends on pull requests to get merged. > > I've used the opportunity to look for any remaining code that you may > > have missed, by tracking symbols that are defined globally but never used > > in mach-shmobile, and didn't find much (which is good). > > > > Could you have a look at the patch below and integrate the parts that > > make sense to you? > > I think most of this has already been fixed in Simon's next branch in the mean > time. Ok, thanks for taking a look. Arnd
Hi Arnd, On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 8:42 PM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote: > On Tuesday 06 October 2015 17:47:37 Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: >> On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 3:58 PM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote: >> > On Thursday 17 September 2015 17:59:33 Simon Horman wrote: >> >> Please consider these Renesas ARM based SoC cleanup for v4.4. >> >> >> >> 24 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2687 deletions(-) >> >> >> >> Is a pleasing diffstat if I do say so myself. >> >> >> >> Of particular note the last legacy board code for Renesas ARM based SoCs, >> >> that of the bockw board, is removed in this pull request. >> > >> > After a long delay in response, I've merged it now into next/cleanup. >> > >> > So the transition is complete and you beat me with the multiplatform >> > conversion that I have pending for the other ARMv7 platforms, nice work! >> >> Thanks for pulling! >> >> Now I can start out sending my platform data removal series... > > Ok, cool. > > I don't think that there is generally a need to wait before sending > stuff out that depends on pull requests to get merged. Seems like several subsystem maintainers are uncomfortable with taking these patches even after the legacy removal has hit arm-soc/for-next... Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds
On Monday 12 October 2015 09:12:15 Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 8:42 PM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote: > > On Tuesday 06 October 2015 17:47:37 Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > >> > >> Now I can start out sending my platform data removal series... > > > > Ok, cool. > > > > I don't think that there is generally a need to wait before sending > > stuff out that depends on pull requests to get merged. > > Seems like several subsystem maintainers are uncomfortable with taking > these patches even after the legacy removal has hit arm-soc/for-next... Ah, I was misunderstanding you here. I thought these were also patches for arm-soc. Arnd