Message ID | DF0F476B391FA8409C78302C7BA518B6317F5E48@DBDE01.ent.ti.com |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
On Wednesday 14 March 2012, Nori, Sekhar wrote: > Hi Arnd, Olof, > > Can you please pull the following DaVinci fixes for v3.3. > They fix a build and section mismatch warning. > > Thanks, > Sekhar > > The following changes since commit fde7d9049e55ab85a390be7f415d74c9f62dd0f9: > Linus Torvalds (1): > Linux 3.3-rc7 > > are available in the git repository at: > > git://gitorious.org/linux-davinci/linux-davinci.git fixes > > Uwe Kleine-Kï¿¿ï¿¿nig (2): > ARM: davinci: cpufreq: fix compiler warning > ARM: davinci: DA850: move da850_register_pm to .init.text > > arch/arm/mach-davinci/cpufreq.c | 2 +- > arch/arm/mach-davinci/da850.c | 2 +- > 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(- > Hi Sekhar, I've applied these two to the next/fixes-non-critical branch for v3.4, not the fixes branch for v3.3 because they both look like they have no impact on production systems other than the build warnings. If I missed something and one or both patches are indeed required for 3.3, please let me know. Arnd
Hi Arnd, On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 21:22:09, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Wednesday 14 March 2012, Nori, Sekhar wrote: > > Hi Arnd, Olof, > > > > Can you please pull the following DaVinci fixes for v3.3. > > They fix a build and section mismatch warning. > > > > Thanks, > > Sekhar > > > > The following changes since commit fde7d9049e55ab85a390be7f415d74c9f62dd0f9: > > Linus Torvalds (1): > > Linux 3.3-rc7 > > > > are available in the git repository at: > > > > git://gitorious.org/linux-davinci/linux-davinci.git fixes > > > > Uwe Kleine-Kï¿¿ï¿¿nig (2): > > ARM: davinci: cpufreq: fix compiler warning > > ARM: davinci: DA850: move da850_register_pm to .init.text > > > > arch/arm/mach-davinci/cpufreq.c | 2 +- > > arch/arm/mach-davinci/da850.c | 2 +- > > 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(- > > > > Hi Sekhar, > > I've applied these two to the next/fixes-non-critical branch for v3.4, > not the fixes branch for v3.3 because they both look like they have > no impact on production systems other than the build warnings. > > If I missed something and one or both patches are indeed required for 3.3, > please let me know. That's right, they will not have impact on production systems and are not v3.3 regressions either. Queuing for v3.4 is the right choice. Thanks, Sekhar