| Message ID | DF0F476B391FA8409C78302C7BA518B6317EEB34@DBDE01.ent.ti.com |
|---|---|
| State | New |
| Headers | show |
Hi, On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 11:23 AM, Nori, Sekhar <nsekhar@ti.com> wrote: > Hi Arnd, Olof, > > Can you please pull these two patches adding support > for DaVinci DM644x V4L2 display support for v3.4. > > These patches heavily depend on the clean-up series sent earlier. > Since the clean-up series is already included in for-next branch > of arm-soc, I have generated a request using that as baseline. > > Let me know if that's not desirable, and I can do it any > other way you want. > > Thanks, > Sekhar > > The following changes since commit 3a034af7c1a3c55014eeb15a9c9430e9f72810e4: > Arnd Bergmann (1): > Merge branch 'next/fixes-non-critical' into for-next It looks like this branch is based on the contents of the for-next branch. That's not a stable base so I can't pull it. If you need it to build on contents already in arm-soc, you need to base it on either your own cleanup branch, or the aggregate next/* branch in arm-soc. for-next is rebuilt, and is never sent up to Linus in it's current form. Since you said they require the cleanup branch as a base, please rebase them on top of next/cleanup instead. Thanks! -Olof
Hi Olof, On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 22:00:18, Olof Johansson wrote: > On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 11:23 AM, Nori, Sekhar <nsekhar@ti.com> wrote: [...] > > The following changes since commit 3a034af7c1a3c55014eeb15a9c9430e9f72810e4: > > Arnd Bergmann (1): > > Merge branch 'next/fixes-non-critical' into for-next > > It looks like this branch is based on the contents of the for-next > branch. That's not a stable base so I can't pull it. > > If you need it to build on contents already in arm-soc, you need to > base it on either your own cleanup branch, or the aggregate next/* > branch in arm-soc. for-next is rebuilt, and is never sent up to Linus > in it's current form. > > Since you said they require the cleanup branch as a base, please > rebase them on top of next/cleanup instead. Thanks for the feedback. I will re-submit this pull request. Regards, Sekhar
Hi Arnd, Olof, Can you please pull these two patches adding support for DaVinci DM644x V4L2 display support for v3.4. These patches heavily depend on the clean-up series sent earlier. Since the clean-up series is already included in for-next branch of arm-soc, I have generated a request using that as baseline. Let me know if that's not desirable, and I can do it any other way you want. Thanks, Sekhar The following changes since commit 3a034af7c1a3c55014eeb15a9c9430e9f72810e4: Arnd Bergmann (1): Merge branch 'next/fixes-non-critical' into for-next are available in the git repository at: git://gitorious.org/linux-davinci/linux-davinci.git v3.4/features Manjunath Hadli (2): ARM: davinci: dm644x: add support for v4l2 video display ARM: davinci: dm644x evm: add support for VPBE display arch/arm/mach-davinci/board-dm644x-evm.c | 109 +++++++++++++++++++- arch/arm/mach-davinci/davinci.h | 8 ++- arch/arm/mach-davinci/dm644x.c | 166 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++--- 3 files changed, 268 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)