Message ID | CACRpkdYeWi2cx2weXao9=2f78eM0_J=gK-8o6gKjcG7pjYFAxA@mail.gmail.com |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
On Friday 03 May 2013, Linus Walleij wrote: > Hi ARM SoC folks, > > here are two ux500 fixes for the v3.10 series, please pull > them in. Since -rc1 is not out this is based on Torvald's > HEAD from yesterday. We try hard to avoid doing bug fixes on top of random HEADs. Can you send these on top of the minimum set of branches? Arnd
On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 10:40 PM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote: > On Friday 03 May 2013, Linus Walleij wrote: >> Hi ARM SoC folks, >> >> here are two ux500 fixes for the v3.10 series, please pull >> them in. Since -rc1 is not out this is based on Torvald's >> HEAD from yesterday. > > We try hard to avoid doing bug fixes on top of random HEADs. > Can you send these on top of the minimum set of branches? I think I'll just wait for -rc1. It's not *that* urgent, just wanted to clean my desk. Yours, Linus Walleij
On Friday 03 May 2013 22:43:10 Linus Walleij wrote: > On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 10:40 PM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote: > > On Friday 03 May 2013, Linus Walleij wrote: > >> Hi ARM SoC folks, > >> > >> here are two ux500 fixes for the v3.10 series, please pull > >> them in. Since -rc1 is not out this is based on Torvald's > >> HEAD from yesterday. > > > > We try hard to avoid doing bug fixes on top of random HEADs. > > Can you send these on top of the minimum set of branches? > > I think I'll just wait for -rc1. > > It's not *that* urgent, just wanted to clean my desk. Ok, sounds good. Arnd
On Fri, May 03, 2013 at 10:43:10PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 10:40 PM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote: > > On Friday 03 May 2013, Linus Walleij wrote: > >> Hi ARM SoC folks, > >> > >> here are two ux500 fixes for the v3.10 series, please pull > >> them in. Since -rc1 is not out this is based on Torvald's > >> HEAD from yesterday. > > > > We try hard to avoid doing bug fixes on top of random HEADs. > > Can you send these on top of the minimum set of branches? > > I think I'll just wait for -rc1. > > It's not *that* urgent, just wanted to clean my desk. I've got a branch started at a non-rc for fixes right now, since we want some of them in before the first -rc. So I'll cherry-pick these over while I'm at it. -Olof