| Message ID | 20210122143536.168833-1-nicolas.ferre@microchip.com |
|---|---|
| State | New |
| Headers | show |
| Series | [GIT,PULL] ARM: at91: soc for 5.12 | expand |
On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 3:35 PM <nicolas.ferre@microchip.com> wrote: > > From: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@microchip.com> > > Arnd, Olof, > > I'm taking back the lead on sending the pull-requests for AT91 and hope that I > didn't loose the knowledge in the meantime. Tell me if there's something I'm > missing. Thanks a lot to Alexandre who kept our flow steady and very > predictable during all those years! > > Here are the first SoC changes for 5.12 which contain a single patch for multi > platform kernels. > > I plan to send another pull-request for the SoC changes related to new sama7g5 > that Claudiu sent to the mainling-list recently. I'll let it mature in > linux-next by the beginning of next week and will send another pull-request by > mid-next-week. > Tell me if you see a problem with this approach. This all looks good to me, but I think I'd rather take the 'soc' pull request into the v5.11 bugfixes, as this may already affect users on other machines. I would also suggest adding a 'Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org' tag. If you like, I can just cherry-pick that patch into the fixes branch and add it there. Arnd
On 22/01/2021 at 16:25, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 3:35 PM <nicolas.ferre@microchip.com> wrote: >> >> From: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@microchip.com> >> >> Arnd, Olof, >> >> I'm taking back the lead on sending the pull-requests for AT91 and hope that I >> didn't loose the knowledge in the meantime. Tell me if there's something I'm >> missing. Thanks a lot to Alexandre who kept our flow steady and very >> predictable during all those years! >> >> Here are the first SoC changes for 5.12 which contain a single patch for multi >> platform kernels. >> >> I plan to send another pull-request for the SoC changes related to new sama7g5 >> that Claudiu sent to the mainling-list recently. I'll let it mature in >> linux-next by the beginning of next week and will send another pull-request by >> mid-next-week. >> Tell me if you see a problem with this approach. > > This all looks good to me, but I think I'd rather take the 'soc' pull request > into the v5.11 bugfixes, as this may already affect users on other machines. > > I would also suggest adding a 'Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org' tag. If you like, > I can just cherry-pick that patch into the fixes branch and add it there. Oh yes, that'd be good, indeed. You can add the following tag: Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org #4.12+ Best regards,
On 22/01/2021 16:25:47+0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 3:35 PM <nicolas.ferre@microchip.com> wrote: > > > > From: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@microchip.com> > > > > Arnd, Olof, > > > > I'm taking back the lead on sending the pull-requests for AT91 and hope that I > > didn't loose the knowledge in the meantime. Tell me if there's something I'm > > missing. Thanks a lot to Alexandre who kept our flow steady and very > > predictable during all those years! > > > > Here are the first SoC changes for 5.12 which contain a single patch for multi > > platform kernels. > > > > I plan to send another pull-request for the SoC changes related to new sama7g5 > > that Claudiu sent to the mainling-list recently. I'll let it mature in > > linux-next by the beginning of next week and will send another pull-request by > > mid-next-week. > > Tell me if you see a problem with this approach. > > This all looks good to me, but I think I'd rather take the 'soc' pull request > into the v5.11 bugfixes, as this may already affect users on other machines. > > I would also suggest adding a 'Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org' tag. If you like, > I can just cherry-pick that patch into the fixes branch and add it there. > I wouldn't backport it as a fix, this is just a warning, in a configuration that is very unlikely to be used (and honestly, I wouldn't enable this driver on any platform). If you take it as a fix, you'll have to also get https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/1611318097-8970-5-git-send-email-claudiu.beznea@microchip.com/
On 22/01/2021 at 17:35, Alexandre Belloni wrote: > EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe > > On 22/01/2021 16:25:47+0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: >> On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 3:35 PM <nicolas.ferre@microchip.com> wrote: >>> >>> From: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@microchip.com> >>> >>> Arnd, Olof, >>> >>> I'm taking back the lead on sending the pull-requests for AT91 and hope that I >>> didn't loose the knowledge in the meantime. Tell me if there's something I'm >>> missing. Thanks a lot to Alexandre who kept our flow steady and very >>> predictable during all those years! >>> >>> Here are the first SoC changes for 5.12 which contain a single patch for multi >>> platform kernels. >>> >>> I plan to send another pull-request for the SoC changes related to new sama7g5 >>> that Claudiu sent to the mainling-list recently. I'll let it mature in >>> linux-next by the beginning of next week and will send another pull-request by >>> mid-next-week. >>> Tell me if you see a problem with this approach. >> >> This all looks good to me, but I think I'd rather take the 'soc' pull request >> into the v5.11 bugfixes, as this may already affect users on other machines. >> >> I would also suggest adding a 'Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org' tag. If you like, >> I can just cherry-pick that patch into the fixes branch and add it there. >> > > I wouldn't backport it as a fix, this is just a warning, in a > configuration that is very unlikely to be used (and honestly, I > wouldn't enable this driver on any platform). > > If you take it as a fix, you'll have to also get > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/1611318097-8970-5-git-send-email-claudiu.beznea@microchip.com/ Arnd, Alexandre, Whatever you prefer is fine with me. As I'm not the first impacted I wouldn't push in one direction or another. Best regards,
On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 6:05 PM Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@microchip.com> wrote: > On 22/01/2021 at 17:35, Alexandre Belloni wrote: > > EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe > > > > I wouldn't backport it as a fix, this is just a warning, in a > > configuration that is very unlikely to be used (and honestly, I > > wouldn't enable this driver on any platform). > > > > If you take it as a fix, you'll have to also get > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/1611318097-8970-5-git-send-email-claudiu.beznea@microchip.com/ > > Arnd, Alexandre, > > Whatever you prefer is fine with me. As I'm not the first impacted I > wouldn't push in one direction or another. I've applied both patches to the fixes branch now. While it's only a harmless warning, it is one that would show up for anyone that runs a kernel with this driver built-in on a different machine, and this could be fairly annoying. Arnd
From: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@microchip.com> Arnd, Olof, I'm taking back the lead on sending the pull-requests for AT91 and hope that I didn't loose the knowledge in the meantime. Tell me if there's something I'm missing. Thanks a lot to Alexandre who kept our flow steady and very predictable during all those years! Here are the first SoC changes for 5.12 which contain a single patch for multi platform kernels. I plan to send another pull-request for the SoC changes related to new sama7g5 that Claudiu sent to the mainling-list recently. I'll let it mature in linux-next by the beginning of next week and will send another pull-request by mid-next-week. Tell me if you see a problem with this approach. Thanks, best regards, The following changes since commit 5c8fe583cce542aa0b84adc939ce85293de36e5e: Linux 5.11-rc1 (2020-12-27 15:30:22 -0800) are available in the Git repository at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/at91/linux.git tags/at91-soc-5.12 for you to fetch changes up to 960ddf70cc11024e6e9dac206316d0160e00a77d: drivers: soc: atmel: Avoid calling at91_soc_init on non AT91 SoCs (2020-12-28 17:58:20 +0100) ---------------------------------------------------------------- AT91 SoC for 5.12 - Only call atmel/soc.c driver on AT91 platforms ---------------------------------------------------------------- Sudeep Holla (1): drivers: soc: atmel: Avoid calling at91_soc_init on non AT91 SoCs drivers/soc/atmel/soc.c | 12 ++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)