Message ID | 20161122054824.16974-2-f.fainelli@gmail.com |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
On Monday, November 21, 2016 9:48:20 PM CET Florian Fainelli wrote: > This pull request contains Broadcom ARM-based SoC Device Tree changes for 4.10, > please pull the following: > > - Rafal adds support for the Netgear R8500 routers, adds basic support > for the Tenda AC9 router which uses the new BCM53573 SoC (single core Cortex > A7). He also enables the UART on the Netgear R8000 and restructures the > include files a bit for the BCM47094 SoC, finally he adds USB 3.0 PHY nodes > which enables USB 3.0 on BCM5301X devices that support it. Finally he adds > support for the TP-LINK Archer C9 V1 router. > > - Kamal adds support for the QSPI controller on the Northstar Plus SoCs and updates > the bcm958625k reference board to have it enabled > > - Dan adds support for the Luxul XAP-1510 (using a BCM4708) and XWR-3100 (using > a BCM47094) > > - Scott fixes the pinctrl names in the Cygnus DTS files > > - Jonathan enables the Broadcom iProc mailbox controller for Broadcom Cygnus/iProc > SoCs, he adds interrupt support for the GPIO CRMU hardware block and finally adds > the node for the OTP controller found on Cygnus SoCs > > - Dhananjay enables the GPIO B controller on Norstarh Plus SoCs > > - Eric defines standard pinctrl groups in the BCM2835 GPIO node > > - Gerd adds definitions for the pinctrl groups and updates the PWM, I2C and SDHCI nodes > to use their appropriate pinctrl functions > > - Linus adds names for the Raspberry Pi GPIO lines based on the datasheet > > - Martin adds the DT binding and nodes for the Raspberry Pi firmware thermal block > > - Stefan fixes a few typos with respect to the BCM2835 mailbox binding example and > Device Tree nodes he also fixes the Raspberry Pi GPIO lines names and finally > adds names for the Raspberry Zero GPIO lines > Pulled into next/dt, thanks! Arnd
On Monday, November 21, 2016 9:48:20 PM CET Florian Fainelli wrote:
> 34 files changed, 1440 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
One follow-up: as this was a relatively big branch, it would have
been nice to get parts of it a little earlier. I see that the
raspberry-pi changes make up about half of it and came fairly
late, but the rest apparently was ready much earlier.
If you have the choice between waiting a little longer to
send all the changes at once, and sending off a good chunk
a little earlier, better send multiple sets of pull requests.
Arnd
On 11/30/2016 01:27 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Monday, November 21, 2016 9:48:20 PM CET Florian Fainelli wrote: >> 34 files changed, 1440 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-) > > One follow-up: as this was a relatively big branch, it would have > been nice to get parts of it a little earlier. I see that the > raspberry-pi changes make up about half of it and came fairly > late, but the rest apparently was ready much earlier. > > If you have the choice between waiting a little longer to > send all the changes at once, and sending off a good chunk > a little earlier, better send multiple sets of pull requests. I was trying to minimize the number of pull requests for you to pull, but what you are saying makes perfect sense and helps on many aspects. Thanks a lot for your feedback!