Message ID | 20140923195221.GA30267@nuc |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
On Tuesday 23 September 2014 21:52:21 Carlo Caione wrote: > Hi Arnd and Olof, > > Here the pull request to introduce preliminary support for MesonX SoCs. > It is based on the patchset at: > > http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg362521.html > > and it is based on the master of arm-soc tree. > Hi Carlo, I ended up cherry-picking the individual changes into next/fixes-non-critical, next/defconfig, next/dt and next/soc to fit our process better. In general, please split up pull requests according to the next/* topic branches we have in the arm-soc tree, as documented in arch/arm/arm-soc-for-next-contents.txt (only in the for-next branch). More importantly, please base all changes on the most recent -rc1 release, or possibly a later -rc if you get conflicts otherwise. I know the process takes a little time to get used to ;-) Arnd
On gio, set 25, 2014 at 05:38:36 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Tuesday 23 September 2014 21:52:21 Carlo Caione wrote: > > Hi Arnd and Olof, > > > > Here the pull request to introduce preliminary support for MesonX SoCs. > > It is based on the patchset at: > > > > http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg362521.html > > > > and it is based on the master of arm-soc tree. > > > > Hi Carlo, Hi Arnd, > I ended up cherry-picking the individual changes into next/fixes-non-critical, > next/defconfig, next/dt and next/soc to fit our process better. > > In general, please split up pull requests according to the next/* topic > branches we have in the arm-soc tree, as documented in > arch/arm/arm-soc-for-next-contents.txt (only in the for-next branch). > > More importantly, please base all changes on the most recent -rc1 release, > or possibly a later -rc if you get conflicts otherwise. > > I know the process takes a little time to get used to ;-) Thank you for cherry-picking and for the pointers, next time will be better ;)