Message ID | 20130328140239.GF24039@arm.com |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 02:02:39PM +0000, Catalin Marinas wrote: > As I'm about to go on holiday for two weeks and I haven't heard any > preference for who should be merging these patches, I'm happy for these to go via arm-soc. That makes two of us then - I too will be sporadically away for the next two weeks. Given the amount of mail traffic on these lists now (betweem 400 and 500 messages per day) I will _not_ be catching up with any email afterwards.
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 02:02:39PM +0000, Catalin Marinas wrote: > Hi, > > As I'm about to go on holiday for two weeks and I haven't heard any > preference for who should be merging these patches, I'm sending the pull > request to arm-soc given that 90% of the changes target SoC code. Apart > from the gic_secondary_init() patch, the rest is trivial header code > moving around or removal. > > Russell, if you have any objections, please let arm-soc guys and me know > and feel free to pull these patches via your tree. I don't mind either > way. > > Thanks, > > Catalin > > > The following changes since commit a937536b868b8369b98967929045f1df54234323: > > Linux 3.9-rc3 (2013-03-17 15:59:32 -0700) > > are available in the git repository at: > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/cmarinas/linux-aarch64.git gic Pulled as gic/cleanup into next/cleanup. I got a handful of context conflicts due to additions near the old secondary_init functions, and one add/add conflict on includes. All trivial to resolve. -Olof