Message ID | 20130210154715.GB3983@S2101-09.ap.freescale.net |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 11:47:17PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote: > On Sat, Feb 09, 2013 at 06:25:14PM -0800, Olof Johansson wrote: > > So, this has two merge conflicts. One with the cpuidle branch. Fine, that's > > easy to resolve. > > > > The one that's a real pain though, is the one with a fixes branch you > > sent in, which changes _one property_, but throws a _HUGE_ merge conflict. > > > > Why? Because you chose to do the churn on all the dtsi files. And this > > is a conflict that would percolate all the way up so Linus sees it the way it > > is now. > > > Sorry, I forgot testing the merging between this and the last fixes tag. > > > Please resolve this on your own and send out a new pull request. There's > > a couple of ways to do it, either merge in your fixes branch, or rebase > > on top of it. > > > Done. Please pull the refreshed tag below. > > Shawn > > > The following changes since commit d441667c7838d56bcace9a2465f0c1ff677bf2c0: > > Merge tag 'imx-fixes-3.8-4' into imx/dt (2013-02-10 23:23:47 +0800) > > are available in the git repository at: > > > git://git.linaro.org/people/shawnguo/linux-2.6.git tags/imx-dt-3.9 Hi, I've pulled this into a late/dt branch. I expect to send this up standalone to Linus due to the amount of churn, since I don't want to risk other platforms being rejected due to it. -Olof