Message ID | 20120512021726.GC17875@S2101-09.ap.freescale.net |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
Shawn, On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 7:17 PM, Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org> wrote: > Hi Arnd, Olof, > > This series adds dummy pinctrl states for imx and mxs platforms and > then adopts pinctrl support for some outstanding imx and mxs drivers. > The reason that the series mixes two sub-architectures patches is some > drivers are shared between two sub-architectures, so we need to handle > them as a whole. > > I haven't got the acks from all subsystem maintainers. Considering > we are close to merge window now, and the change is quite simple while > mxs device tree series depends on it, I would like to send the pull > request right away and hopefully to get it expose on linux-next soon. > I copied subsystem maintainers here in case they see problem to have > their patches go through arm-soc. > > It depends on pinctrl branch below. > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/linusw/linux-pinctrl.git devel (or for-next) > > Per Linus, his devel branch is identify to for-next, and both branches > are stable (non-rebased). The driver changes looks reasonably contained, so I pulled this branch in. If we get a hard NACK from someone we can drop it if we have to (but hopefully that won't happen). Please double-check that my conflict resolution in for-next was done right. -Olof
On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 11:55:14PM -0700, Olof Johansson wrote: > Please double-check that my conflict resolution in for-next was done right. > Thanks Olof. It looks all good.
On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 10:17:28AM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote: > I copied subsystem maintainers here in case they see problem to have > their patches go through arm-soc. Not quite successful there... > ASoC: mxs-saif: adopt pinctrl support Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> This is much more the workflow we normally use for this sort of stuff - minimal, split out topic branches rather than a single branch with a whole raft of dependencies on different subsystems. We shouldn't be doing complex staging through arm-soc, if that becomes the norm then we really should have a tree where that sort of thing happens for the kernel at large rather than using arm-soc.
On 13 May 2012 18:33, Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> wrote: > On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 10:17:28AM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote: > >> I copied subsystem maintainers here in case they see problem to have >> their patches go through arm-soc. > > Not quite successful there... > I did not copy you here because I have collected your ack on the patch below. [1] Regards, Shawn >> ASoC: mxs-saif: adopt pinctrl support > > Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> > [1] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.serial/7752/focus=97325