Message ID | 20120507223632.GP5088@atomide.com |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
Hi, On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 3:36 PM, Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> wrote: > The following changes since commit 69964ea4c7b68c9399f7977aa5b9aa6539a6a98a: [..] > Enrico Butera (1): > ARM: OMAP: igep0020: fix smsc911x dummy regulator id Hmm. Picking 40 without any kind of comment in the code isn't doing any favors for future readers. Seems like 1 would be free on this board, from the rest of the board file to judge (one other reg-fixed-regulator platform device)? Please either comment why you picked 40 (i.e. it's a random number), or change it to something a little less random like 1. :) > Laurent Pinchart (1): > ARM: OMAP: igep0020: Specify the VPLL2 regulator unconditionally Is this a regression? I don't see any recent changes regarding this, so it's hard to tell. If not then I'd rather hold off for the merge window given that we're at -rc6. -Olof
On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 8:48 AM, Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 3:36 PM, Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> wrote: >> The following changes since commit 69964ea4c7b68c9399f7977aa5b9aa6539a6a98a: > [..] >> Enrico Butera (1): >> ARM: OMAP: igep0020: fix smsc911x dummy regulator id > > Hmm. Picking 40 without any kind of comment in the code isn't doing > any favors for future readers. Seems like 1 would be free on this > board, from the rest of the board file to judge (one other > reg-fixed-regulator platform device)? > > Please either comment why you picked 40 (i.e. it's a random number), > or change it to something a little less random like 1. :) Yes i verified that 1 is free, i will send an updated patch. Enrico
Hi Olof, On Tuesday 08 May 2012 23:48:06 Olof Johansson wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 3:36 PM, Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> wrote: > > The following changes since commit 69964ea4c7b68c9399f7977aa5b9aa6539a6a98a: > [..] > > > Enrico Butera (1): > > ARM: OMAP: igep0020: fix smsc911x dummy regulator id > > Hmm. Picking 40 without any kind of comment in the code isn't doing > any favors for future readers. Seems like 1 would be free on this > board, from the rest of the board file to judge (one other > reg-fixed-regulator platform device)? > > Please either comment why you picked 40 (i.e. it's a random number), > or change it to something a little less random like 1. :) > > > Laurent Pinchart (1): > > ARM: OMAP: igep0020: Specify the VPLL2 regulator unconditionally > > Is this a regression? I don't see any recent changes regarding this, > so it's hard to tell. If not then I'd rather hold off for the merge > window given that we're at -rc6. It's not a regression, I'm fine with holding off until the v3.5 merge window.
* Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com> [120509 04:09]: > Hi Olof, > > On Tuesday 08 May 2012 23:48:06 Olof Johansson wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 3:36 PM, Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> wrote: > > > The following changes since commit > 69964ea4c7b68c9399f7977aa5b9aa6539a6a98a: > > [..] > > > > > Enrico Butera (1): > > > ARM: OMAP: igep0020: fix smsc911x dummy regulator id > > > > Hmm. Picking 40 without any kind of comment in the code isn't doing > > any favors for future readers. Seems like 1 would be free on this > > board, from the rest of the board file to judge (one other > > reg-fixed-regulator platform device)? > > > > Please either comment why you picked 40 (i.e. it's a random number), > > or change it to something a little less random like 1. :) I'll use the update patch from Enrico. > > > Laurent Pinchart (1): > > > ARM: OMAP: igep0020: Specify the VPLL2 regulator unconditionally > > > > Is this a regression? I don't see any recent changes regarding this, > > so it's hard to tell. If not then I'd rather hold off for the merge > > window given that we're at -rc6. > > It's not a regression, I'm fine with holding off until the v3.5 merge window. And will move this one into fixes-non-critical. Will send a new pull request shortly. Tony