Message ID | 20120328055801.GA3953@S2100-06.ap.freescale.net |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 01:58:04PM +0800, Guo Shawn-R65073 wrote: > On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 10:31:10PM +0800, Dong Aisheng wrote: > > From: Dong Aisheng <dong.aisheng@linaro.org> ... > > +/dts-v1/; > > +/include/ "imx28.dtsi" > > + > > +/ { > > + model = "Freescale i.MX28 Evaluation Kit"; > > + compatible = "fsl,imx28-evk", "fsl,imx28"; > > + > > + memory { > > + device_type = "memory"; > > This is already in skeleton.dtsi included by imx28.dtsi. > Correct. > > +/include/ "skeleton.dtsi" > > + > > +/ { > > + #address-cells = <1>; > > + #size-cells = <1>; > > These two are already in skeleton.dtsi. > will remove. > > + icoll: interrupt-controller@80000000 { > > + compatible = "fsl,imx28-icoll"; > > I would expect it be: > > compatible = "fsl,imx28-icoll", "fsl,mxs-icoll"; > > So it can be matched by both imx23 and imx28. > Yes, i can change like that. > > + #interrupt-cells = <1>; > > + }; > > + > > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-mxs/Kconfig b/arch/arm/mach-mxs/Kconfig > > index c57f996..c776aef 100644 > > --- a/arch/arm/mach-mxs/Kconfig > > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-mxs/Kconfig > > @@ -17,6 +17,14 @@ config SOC_IMX28 > > > > comment "MXS platforms:" > > > > +config MACH_MXS_DT > > + bool "Support MXS platforms from device tree" > > + select SOC_IMX28 > > + select USE_OF > > + help > > + Include support for Freescale MXS platforms(i.MX23 and i.MX28) > > + using the device tree for discovery > > + > > If I build mxs_defconfig with only MACH_MXS_DT enabled, I got > > LD .tmp_vmlinux1 > arch/arm/mach-mxs/built-in.o: In function `mxs_add_amba_device': > arch/arm/mach-mxs/devices.c:89: undefined reference to `amba_device_register' > It looks ideally we do not need to compile devices.c and devices/* for only dt. > It's caused by missing "select ARM_AMBA". For non-dt build, it gets > selected under "config MXS_HAVE_AMBA_DUART" (mach-mxs/devices/Kconfig). > > I intend to fix it in the following way. > I agree with this temporary fix. > --8<--- > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-mxs/Kconfig b/arch/arm/mach-mxs/Kconfig > index 570d5d5..d076452 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/mach-mxs/Kconfig > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-mxs/Kconfig > @@ -7,11 +7,13 @@ config MXS_OCOTP > > config SOC_IMX23 > bool > + select ARM_AMBA > select CPU_ARM926T > select HAVE_PWM > > config SOC_IMX28 > bool > + select ARM_AMBA > select CPU_ARM926T > select HAVE_PWM > > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-mxs/devices/Kconfig b/arch/arm/mach-mxs/devices/Kconfig > index 18b6bf5..2febd62 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/mach-mxs/devices/Kconfig > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-mxs/devices/Kconfig > @@ -1,6 +1,5 @@ > config MXS_HAVE_AMBA_DUART > bool > - select ARM_AMBA > > --->8-- > > > +#include <linux/init.h> > > +#include <linux/irqdomain.h> > > +#include <linux/of_irq.h> > > +#include <linux/of_platform.h> > > +#include <asm/mach/arch.h> > > +#include <asm/mach/time.h> > > +#include <mach/common.h> > > +#include <mach/mx28.h> > > This one is not needed. > Correct. > > + > > +static int __init imx28_icoll_add_irq_domain(struct device_node *np, > > mxs_icoll_add_irq_domain > > > + struct device_node *interrupt_parent) > > +{ > > + irq_domain_add_simple(np, 0); > > + > > + return 0; > > +} > > + > > +static const struct of_device_id mxs_irq_match[] __initconst = { > > + { .compatible = "fsl,imx28-icoll", .data = imx28_icoll_add_irq_domain, }, > > "fsl,mxs-icoll" > Will change. > > + { /* sentinel */ } > > +}; > > + > > +static void __init mxs_dt_init_irq(void) > > +{ > > + icoll_init_irq(); > > + of_irq_init(mxs_irq_match); > > +} > > + > > +static void __init imx28_timer_init(void) > > +{ > > + mx28_clocks_init(); > > +} > > + > > +static struct sys_timer imx28_timer = { > > + .init = imx28_timer_init, > > +}; > > + > > +static void __init imx28_machine_init(void) > > mxs_init_machine(), so that imx23 can use it later and have the > function name somehow aligned with hook name .init_machine. > I can do it, but, as icoll, that means we're doing things by assuming no difference between mx23 and mx28 before we really start mx23 dt work. However, i think at least of_platform_populate should be common. So i agree to change to mxs_init_machine right now. If any difference we may change accordingly latter. > > +{ > > + of_platform_populate(NULL, of_default_bus_match_table, > > + NULL, NULL); > > +} > > + > > +static const char *imx28_dt_compat[] __initdata = { > > mxs_dt_compat > If changed like that, is it reasonable for mx23 to use this compatible string list? I planed to have separate compatible string for mx23 and mx28. > > + "fsl,imx28", > > + "fsl,imx28-evk", > > I would have the list sorted from the most specific to the most > general. That said, it's better to have "fsl,imx28" sorted after > "fsl,imx28-evk". > I prefer to keep the basic one first, then for future boards support we just add them below rather than insert above the basic one "fsl,imx28". However, it's really not a big deal. If you persist to do like that, i can also do it. > > + NULL, > > +}; > > + > > +DT_MACHINE_START(IMX28, "Freescale i.MX28 (Device Tree)") > > + .map_io = mx28_map_io, > > + .init_irq = mxs_dt_init_irq, > > + .timer = &imx28_timer, > > + .init_machine = imx28_machine_init, > > + .dt_compat = imx28_dt_compat, > > + .restart = mxs_restart, > > +MACHINE_END > > -- > > 1.7.0.4 > > > Regards Dong Aisheng
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 05:53:47PM +0800, Dong Aisheng wrote: > On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 01:58:04PM +0800, Guo Shawn-R65073 wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 10:31:10PM +0800, Dong Aisheng wrote: > > > From: Dong Aisheng <dong.aisheng@linaro.org> ... > > > +static const char *imx28_dt_compat[] __initdata = { > > > > mxs_dt_compat > > > If changed like that, is it reasonable for mx23 to use this > compatible string list? > I planed to have separate compatible string for mx23 and mx28. Ok, I'm fine with that, since we will have separate DT_MACHINE_START for imx23 and imx28. > > > > + "fsl,imx28", > > > + "fsl,imx28-evk", > > > > I would have the list sorted from the most specific to the most > > general. That said, it's better to have "fsl,imx28" sorted after > > "fsl,imx28-evk". > > > I prefer to keep the basic one first, then for future boards support > we just add them below rather than insert above the basic one "fsl,imx28". > However, it's really not a big deal. > If you persist to do like that, i can also do it. > Yes, please. Listing items from the most specific to the general is the rule for compatible property and match table.
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-mxs/Kconfig b/arch/arm/mach-mxs/Kconfig index 570d5d5..d076452 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-mxs/Kconfig +++ b/arch/arm/mach-mxs/Kconfig @@ -7,11 +7,13 @@ config MXS_OCOTP config SOC_IMX23 bool + select ARM_AMBA select CPU_ARM926T select HAVE_PWM config SOC_IMX28 bool + select ARM_AMBA select CPU_ARM926T select HAVE_PWM diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-mxs/devices/Kconfig b/arch/arm/mach-mxs/devices/Kconfig index 18b6bf5..2febd62 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-mxs/devices/Kconfig +++ b/arch/arm/mach-mxs/devices/Kconfig @@ -1,6 +1,5 @@ config MXS_HAVE_AMBA_DUART bool - select ARM_AMBA --->8-- > config MACH_STMP378X_DEVB