Message ID | 20110811065837.GA4989@july |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
Kyungmin Park wrote: > > The following changes since commit > 322a8b034003c0d46d39af85bf24fee27b902f48: > > Linux 3.1-rc1 (2011-08-07 18:23:30 -0700) > > are available in the git repository at: > git://git.infradead.org/users/kmpark/linux-2.6-samsung for-arnd > > Kyungmin Park (2): > ARM: exynos4: universal: Use the correct regulator names > ARM: exynos4: Use nr_irqs instead of NR_IRQS > > Marek Szyprowski (5): > ARM: Exynos4: add required chained_irq_enter/exit to eint code > ARM: Samsung: Add chained enrty/exit call to timer interrupt handler > ARM: S5P: add required chained_irq_enter/exit to gpio-int code > ARM: Exynos4: use s5p-timer for UniversalC210 board > ARM: Samsung: fix watchdog reset issue with clk_get() > > Sylwester Nawrocki (1): > ARM: EXYNOS4: Fix the IRQ definitions for MIPI CSIS device > > arch/arm/mach-exynos4/Kconfig | 3 +++ > arch/arm/mach-exynos4/clock.c | 1 + > arch/arm/mach-exynos4/include/mach/irqs.h | 5 ++--- > arch/arm/mach-exynos4/irq-combiner.c | 2 +- > arch/arm/mach-exynos4/irq-eint.c | 7 +++++++ > arch/arm/mach-exynos4/mach-universal_c210.c | 8 +++++--- > arch/arm/mach-s3c2412/clock.c | 1 + > arch/arm/mach-s3c2416/clock.c | 2 +- > arch/arm/mach-s3c2443/clock.c | 1 + > arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/clock.c | 1 + > arch/arm/mach-s5p64x0/cpu.c | 2 ++ > arch/arm/mach-s5pc100/clock.c | 1 + > arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/clock.c | 1 + > arch/arm/plat-s3c24xx/s3c2410-clock.c | 1 + > arch/arm/plat-s5p/irq-gpioint.c | 6 ++++++ > arch/arm/plat-samsung/clock.c | 9 +++++++++ > arch/arm/plat-samsung/include/plat/clock.h | 2 ++ > .../arm/plat-samsung/include/plat/watchdog-reset.h | 10 +++------- > arch/arm/plat-samsung/irq-vic-timer.c | 5 +++++ > 19 files changed, 53 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-) No, if above is required, I think, this should be handled from me not you. Don't make a complete confusion between your board and Samsung architecture maintainer. Thanks. Best regards, Kgene. -- Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>, Senior Engineer, SW Solution Development Team, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
On Thursday 11 August 2011, Kukjin Kim wrote: > > Linux 3.1-rc1 (2011-08-07 18:23:30 -0700) > > > > are available in the git repository at: > > git://git.infradead.org/users/kmpark/linux-2.6-samsung for-arnd > > > No, if above is required, I think, this should be handled from me not you. > > Don't make a complete confusion between your board and Samsung architecture > maintainer. I'll hold off on pulling this one then until I get another pull request from you. Looking at the contents of the branch, I noticed that it's not clear why they are needed in 3.1. It would help me if you (whoever sends me the bug fixes) can categorize them in the changelog: * Any bug fixes against old bugs should be marked 'Cc: stable@kernel.org' so that they can get identified for backports. * Regressions against the 3.0 kernel should get marked as such. * Bug fixes against new code should also be identified as such. Arnd
Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > On Thursday 11 August 2011, Kukjin Kim wrote: > > > Linux 3.1-rc1 (2011-08-07 18:23:30 -0700) > > > > > > are available in the git repository at: > > > git://git.infradead.org/users/kmpark/linux-2.6-samsung for-arnd > > > > > > No, if above is required, I think, this should be handled from me not you. > > > > Don't make a complete confusion between your board and Samsung architecture > > maintainer. > > I'll hold off on pulling this one then until I get another pull request > from you. > > Looking at the contents of the branch, I noticed that it's not clear why > they are needed in 3.1. It would help me if you (whoever sends me the bug > fixes) can categorize them in the changelog: > > * Any bug fixes against old bugs should be marked 'Cc: stable@kernel.org' > so that they can get identified for backports. > > * Regressions against the 3.0 kernel should get marked as such. > > * Bug fixes against new code should also be identified as such. > OK, I see. As a note, I will send Samsung fixes in the beginning of next week. Thanks. Best regards, Kgene. -- Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>, Senior Engineer, SW Solution Development Team, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 1:04 PM, Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com> wrote: > Arnd Bergmann wrote: >> >> On Thursday 11 August 2011, Kukjin Kim wrote: >> > > Linux 3.1-rc1 (2011-08-07 18:23:30 -0700) >> > > >> > > are available in the git repository at: >> > > git://git.infradead.org/users/kmpark/linux-2.6-samsung for-arnd >> > > >> >> > No, if above is required, I think, this should be handled from me not > you. >> > >> > Don't make a complete confusion between your board and Samsung > architecture >> > maintainer. >> >> I'll hold off on pulling this one then until I get another pull request >> from you. >> >> Looking at the contents of the branch, I noticed that it's not clear why >> they are needed in 3.1. It would help me if you (whoever sends me the bug >> fixes) can categorize them in the changelog: >> >> * Any bug fixes against old bugs should be marked 'Cc: stable@kernel.org' >> so that they can get identified for backports. >> >> * Regressions against the 3.0 kernel should get marked as such. >> >> * Bug fixes against new code should also be identified as such. >> > OK, I see. > > As a note, I will send Samsung fixes in the beginning of next week. Do you need more time? > > Thanks. > > Best regards, > Kgene. > -- > Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>, Senior Engineer, > SW Solution Development Team, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. > >
Kyungmin Park wrote: > > On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 1:04 PM, Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com> wrote: > > Arnd Bergmann wrote: > >> > >> On Thursday 11 August 2011, Kukjin Kim wrote: > >> > > Linux 3.1-rc1 (2011-08-07 18:23:30 -0700) > >> > > > >> > > are available in the git repository at: > >> > > git://git.infradead.org/users/kmpark/linux-2.6-samsung for-arnd > >> > > > >> > >> > No, if above is required, I think, this should be handled from me not > > you. > >> > > >> > Don't make a complete confusion between your board and Samsung > > architecture > >> > maintainer. > >> > >> I'll hold off on pulling this one then until I get another pull request > >> from you. > >> > >> Looking at the contents of the branch, I noticed that it's not clear why > >> they are needed in 3.1. It would help me if you (whoever sends me the bug > >> fixes) can categorize them in the changelog: > >> > >> * Any bug fixes against old bugs should be marked 'Cc: stable@kernel.org' > >> so that they can get identified for backports. > >> > >> * Regressions against the 3.0 kernel should get marked as such. > >> > >> * Bug fixes against new code should also be identified as such. > >> > > OK, I see. > > > > As a note, I will send Samsung fixes in the beginning of next week. > > Do you need more time? I will send before Arnd's sending for -rc3..maybe late tonight (KST). Now I need to sort out current samsung-fixes... Thanks. Best regards, Kgene. -- Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>, Senior Engineer, SW Solution Development Team, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.