Message ID | 1479383450-19183-1-git-send-email-sudeep.holla@arm.com |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
On Thursday, November 17, 2016 11:50:50 AM CET Sudeep Holla wrote: > Currently platforms/drivers needing to get the machine model name are > replicating the same snippet of code. In some case, the OF reference > counting is either missing or incorrect. > > This patch adds support to read the machine model name either using > the "model" or the "compatible" property in the device tree root node. > > Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> I like the idea. One small comment: > +int of_machine_get_model_name(const char **model) > +{ > + int error; > + struct device_node *root; > + > + root = of_find_node_by_path("/"); > + if (!root) > + return -EINVAL; The global of_root variable points ot this already, and is defined in the same file, so I think we can just skip the lookup. Arnd
On 17/11/16 13:50, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Thursday, November 17, 2016 11:50:50 AM CET Sudeep Holla wrote: >> Currently platforms/drivers needing to get the machine model name are >> replicating the same snippet of code. In some case, the OF reference >> counting is either missing or incorrect. >> >> This patch adds support to read the machine model name either using >> the "model" or the "compatible" property in the device tree root node. >> >> Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> > > I like the idea. One small comment: > Thanks. I prefer it as single patch but it can't be applied to any tree. Any suggestions on handling this patch to fix the warning in -next ? >> +int of_machine_get_model_name(const char **model) >> +{ >> + int error; >> + struct device_node *root; >> + >> + root = of_find_node_by_path("/"); >> + if (!root) >> + return -EINVAL; > > The global of_root variable points ot this already, and is defined > in the same file, so I think we can just skip the lookup. > Ah right, will fix it.
On Thursday, November 17, 2016 2:08:30 PM CET Sudeep Holla wrote: > On 17/11/16 13:50, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > On Thursday, November 17, 2016 11:50:50 AM CET Sudeep Holla wrote: > >> Currently platforms/drivers needing to get the machine model name are > >> replicating the same snippet of code. In some case, the OF reference > >> counting is either missing or incorrect. > >> > >> This patch adds support to read the machine model name either using > >> the "model" or the "compatible" property in the device tree root node. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> > > > > I like the idea. One small comment: > > > > Thanks. I prefer it as single patch but it can't be applied to any tree. > Any suggestions on handling this patch to fix the warning in -next ? > The patch that causes the warning is currently in the mmc tree, and I don't think it would be good to have your entire patch in there too. It's probably best to just fix the warning there now by adding another open-coded copy of that function, and then apply your patch on top for v4.11. Arnd
On 17/11/16 14:13, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Thursday, November 17, 2016 2:08:30 PM CET Sudeep Holla wrote: >> On 17/11/16 13:50, Arnd Bergmann wrote: >>> On Thursday, November 17, 2016 11:50:50 AM CET Sudeep Holla wrote: >>>> Currently platforms/drivers needing to get the machine model name are >>>> replicating the same snippet of code. In some case, the OF reference >>>> counting is either missing or incorrect. >>>> >>>> This patch adds support to read the machine model name either using >>>> the "model" or the "compatible" property in the device tree root node. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> >>> >>> I like the idea. One small comment: >>> >> >> Thanks. I prefer it as single patch but it can't be applied to any tree. >> Any suggestions on handling this patch to fix the warning in -next ? >> > The patch that causes the warning is currently in the mmc tree, and I > don't think it would be good to have your entire patch in there too. > > It's probably best to just fix the warning there now by adding another > open-coded copy of that function, and then apply your patch on top > for v4.11. Sure, that's much simpler to deal with for now.
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-imx/cpu.c b/arch/arm/mach-imx/cpu.c index b3347d32349f..846f40008752 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-imx/cpu.c +++ b/arch/arm/mach-imx/cpu.c @@ -85,9 +85,7 @@ struct device * __init imx_soc_device_init(void) soc_dev_attr->family = "Freescale i.MX"; - root = of_find_node_by_path("/"); - ret = of_property_read_string(root, "model", &soc_dev_attr->machine); - of_node_put(root); + ret = of_machine_get_model_name(&soc_dev_attr->machine); if (ret) goto free_soc; diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-mxs/mach-mxs.c b/arch/arm/mach-mxs/mach-mxs.c index e4f21086b42b..ed9af3a894f0 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-mxs/mach-mxs.c +++ b/arch/arm/mach-mxs/mach-mxs.c @@ -391,8 +391,7 @@ static void __init mxs_machine_init(void) if (!soc_dev_attr) return; - root = of_find_node_by_path("/"); - ret = of_property_read_string(root, "model", &soc_dev_attr->machine); + ret = of_machine_get_model_name(&soc_dev_attr->machine); if (ret) return; diff --git a/arch/mips/cavium-octeon/setup.c b/arch/mips/cavium-octeon/setup.c index 9a2db1c013d9..2e2b1b5befa4 100644 --- a/arch/mips/cavium-octeon/setup.c +++ b/arch/mips/cavium-octeon/setup.c @@ -498,16 +498,8 @@ static void __init init_octeon_system_type(void) char const *board_type; board_type = cvmx_board_type_to_string(octeon_bootinfo->board_type); - if (board_type == NULL) { - struct device_node *root; - int ret; - - root = of_find_node_by_path("/"); - ret = of_property_read_string(root, "model", &board_type); - of_node_put(root); - if (ret) - board_type = "Unsupported Board"; - } + if (!board_type && of_machine_get_model_name(&board_type)) + board_type = "Unsupported Board"; snprintf(octeon_system_type, sizeof(octeon_system_type), "%s (%s)", board_type, octeon_model_get_string(read_c0_prid())); diff --git a/arch/mips/generic/proc.c b/arch/mips/generic/proc.c index 42b33250a4a2..f7fc067bf908 100644 --- a/arch/mips/generic/proc.c +++ b/arch/mips/generic/proc.c @@ -10,20 +10,11 @@ #include <linux/of.h> -#include <asm/bootinfo.h> - const char *get_system_type(void) { const char *str; - int err; - - err = of_property_read_string(of_root, "model", &str); - if (!err) - return str; - - err = of_property_read_string_index(of_root, "compatible", 0, &str); - if (!err) - return str; - return "Unknown"; + if (of_machine_get_model_name(&str)) + return "Unknown"; + return str; } diff --git a/arch/sh/boards/of-generic.c b/arch/sh/boards/of-generic.c index 1fb6d5714bae..938a14499298 100644 --- a/arch/sh/boards/of-generic.c +++ b/arch/sh/boards/of-generic.c @@ -135,11 +135,7 @@ static void __init sh_of_setup(char **cmdline_p) board_time_init = sh_of_time_init; sh_mv.mv_name = "Unknown SH model"; - root = of_find_node_by_path("/"); - if (root) { - of_property_read_string(root, "model", &sh_mv.mv_name); - of_node_put(root); - } + of_machine_get_model_name(&sh_mv.mv_name); sh_of_smp_probe(); } diff --git a/drivers/of/base.c b/drivers/of/base.c index a0bccb54a9bd..752cb8eefd6e 100644 --- a/drivers/of/base.c +++ b/drivers/of/base.c @@ -546,6 +546,40 @@ int of_machine_is_compatible(const char *compat) EXPORT_SYMBOL(of_machine_is_compatible); /** + * of_machine_get_model_name - Find and read the model name or the compatible + * value for the machine. + * @model: pointer to null terminated return string, modified only if + * return value is 0. + * + * Returns a string containing either the model name or the compatible value + * of the machine if found, else return error. + * + * Search for a machine model name or the compatible if model name is missing + * in a device tree node and retrieve a null terminated string value (pointer + * to data, not a copy). Returns 0 on success, -EINVAL if root of the device + * tree is not found and other error returned by of_property_read_string on + * failure. + */ +int of_machine_get_model_name(const char **model) +{ + int error; + struct device_node *root; + + root = of_find_node_by_path("/"); + if (!root) + return -EINVAL; + + error = of_property_read_string(root, "model", model); + if (error) + error = of_property_read_string_index(root, "compatible", + 0, model); + of_node_put(root); + + return error; +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL(of_machine_get_model_name); + +/** * __of_device_is_available - check if a device is available for use * * @device: Node to check for availability, with locks already held diff --git a/drivers/soc/fsl/guts.c b/drivers/soc/fsl/guts.c index 0ac88263c2d7..94aef0465451 100644 --- a/drivers/soc/fsl/guts.c +++ b/drivers/soc/fsl/guts.c @@ -152,8 +152,7 @@ static int fsl_guts_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) return PTR_ERR(guts->regs); /* Register soc device */ - machine = of_flat_dt_get_machine_name(); - if (machine) + if (!of_machine_get_model_name(&machine)) soc_dev_attr.machine = devm_kstrdup(dev, machine, GFP_KERNEL); svr = fsl_guts_get_svr(); diff --git a/drivers/soc/renesas/renesas-soc.c b/drivers/soc/renesas/renesas-soc.c index 330960312296..d9a119073de5 100644 --- a/drivers/soc/renesas/renesas-soc.c +++ b/drivers/soc/renesas/renesas-soc.c @@ -228,9 +228,7 @@ static int __init renesas_soc_init(void) if (!soc_dev_attr) return -ENOMEM; - np = of_find_node_by_path("/"); - of_property_read_string(np, "model", &soc_dev_attr->machine); - of_node_put(np); + of_machine_get_model_name(&soc_dev_attr->machine); soc_dev_attr->family = kstrdup_const(family->name, GFP_KERNEL); soc_dev_attr->soc_id = kstrdup_const(strchr(match->compatible, ',') + 1, diff --git a/include/linux/of.h b/include/linux/of.h index d72f01009297..13fc66531f1b 100644 --- a/include/linux/of.h +++ b/include/linux/of.h @@ -367,6 +367,7 @@ extern int of_alias_get_id(struct device_node *np, const char *stem); extern int of_alias_get_highest_id(const char *stem); extern int of_machine_is_compatible(const char *compat); +extern int of_machine_get_model_name(const char **model); extern int of_add_property(struct device_node *np, struct property *prop); extern int of_remove_property(struct device_node *np, struct property *prop); @@ -788,6 +789,11 @@ static inline int of_machine_is_compatible(const char *compat) return 0; } +static inline int of_machine_get_model_name(const char **model) +{ + return -EINVAL; +} + static inline bool of_console_check(const struct device_node *dn, const char *name, int index) { return false;
Currently platforms/drivers needing to get the machine model name are replicating the same snippet of code. In some case, the OF reference counting is either missing or incorrect. This patch adds support to read the machine model name either using the "model" or the "compatible" property in the device tree root node. Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> --- arch/arm/mach-imx/cpu.c | 4 +--- arch/arm/mach-mxs/mach-mxs.c | 3 +-- arch/mips/cavium-octeon/setup.c | 12 ++---------- arch/mips/generic/proc.c | 15 +++------------ arch/sh/boards/of-generic.c | 6 +----- drivers/of/base.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ drivers/soc/fsl/guts.c | 3 +-- drivers/soc/renesas/renesas-soc.c | 4 +--- include/linux/of.h | 6 ++++++ 9 files changed, 50 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-) Hi, While trying to fix a simple build warning(as below) in -next for fsl/guts.c, I came across this code duplication in multiple places. WARNING: modpost: Found 1 section mismatch(es). To see full details build your kernel with: 'make CONFIG_DEBUG_SECTION_MISMATCH=y' With CONFIG_DEBUG_SECTION_MISMATCH enabled, the details are reported: WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text+0x55d014): Section mismatch in reference from the function fsl_guts_probe() to the function .init.text:of_flat_dt_get_machine_name() The function fsl_guts_probe() references the function __init of_flat_dt_get_machine_name(). This is often because fsl_guts_probe lacks a __init annotation or the annotation of of_flat_dt_get_machine_name is wrong. I can split the patch if needed if people are OK with the idea. Regards, Sudeep -- 2.7.4