[GIT,PULL] at91: DT for 3.16 at91-dt3 #3

Arnd, Olof, Kevin,

Another AT91 DT pull-request for 3.16. This one is the conversion of two more
SoC to Common Clock Framework (aka CCF). I identified it as a "DT" pull-request
but it modifies slightly a couple of files in mach-at91 (use of a configuration
option).
This pull-request depends on:
- the fixes that I already sent for 3.15 and that are present in the recent
  3.15-rc6 tag.
- the at91-cleanup tag that you integrated in your arm-soc/next/soc branch.
So, as suggested by Arnd on IRC, I merged both of them to act as the base
before adding the material for this pull-request.

About the clock nodes that should be grouped in a "clocks" container or not,
while waiting for a clear statement by the DT maintainers, I kept the clocks
nodes as they had been written by Boris.
As proposed by Olof, I plan to send you a comprehensive patch that fixes this
when Mark gives his point of view.

Thanks, best regards,

The following changes since commit 6a84872a3c3090993be108f02f91b4de062a7d32:

  Merge branch 'at91-3.16-cleanup' into at91-3.16-dt3 (2014-05-22 18:01:22 +0200)

are available in the git repository at:


  git://github.com/at91linux/linux-at91.git tags/at91-dt3

for you to fetch changes up to b4a86b3810f5dc4b959ee69a3818c876752c88cd:

  ARM: at91: move sam9n12 SoC to the CCF (2014-05-22 18:03:17 +0200)

----------------------------------------------------------------
3.16 third DT series:
- move of both at91sam9n12 and at91sam9x5 to CCF

----------------------------------------------------------------
Boris BREZILLON (8):
      ARM: at91: prepare common clk transition for sam9x5 SoCs
      ARM: at91/dt: define sam9x5 clocks
      ARM: at91/dt: define sam9x5ek's crystal frequencies
      ARM: at91: move sam9x5 SoCs to the CCF
      ARM: at91: prepare common clk transition for sam9n12 SoC
      ARM: at91/dt: define sam9n12 clocks
      ARM: at91/dt: define sam9n12ek crystal frequencies
      ARM: at91: move sam9n12 SoC to the CCF

 arch/arm/boot/dts/at91sam9n12.dtsi       | 348 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 arch/arm/boot/dts/at91sam9n12ek.dts      |   8 +
 arch/arm/boot/dts/at91sam9x5.dtsi        | 355 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 arch/arm/boot/dts/at91sam9x5_can.dtsi    |  31 +++
 arch/arm/boot/dts/at91sam9x5_isi.dtsi    |  26 +++
 arch/arm/boot/dts/at91sam9x5_lcd.dtsi    |  26 +++
 arch/arm/boot/dts/at91sam9x5_macb0.dtsi  |  11 +
 arch/arm/boot/dts/at91sam9x5_macb1.dtsi  |  11 +
 arch/arm/boot/dts/at91sam9x5_usart3.dtsi |  11 +
 arch/arm/boot/dts/at91sam9x5cm.dtsi      |   8 +
 arch/arm/mach-at91/Kconfig               |   2 -
 arch/arm/mach-at91/at91sam9n12.c         |   6 +-
 arch/arm/mach-at91/at91sam9x5.c          |   6 +-
 13 files changed, 842 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 arch/arm/boot/dts/at91sam9x5_can.dtsi
 create mode 100644 arch/arm/boot/dts/at91sam9x5_isi.dtsi
 create mode 100644 arch/arm/boot/dts/at91sam9x5_lcd.dtsi

On Thursday 22 May 2014, Nicolas Ferre wrote:
> Another AT91 DT pull-request for 3.16. This one is the conversion of two more
> SoC to Common Clock Framework (aka CCF). I identified it as a "DT" pull-request
> but it modifies slightly a couple of files in mach-at91 (use of a configuration
> option).

Four done, four more to go? Nice progress!

> This pull-request depends on:
> - the fixes that I already sent for 3.15 and that are present in the recent
>   3.15-rc6 tag.
> - the at91-cleanup tag that you integrated in your arm-soc/next/soc branch.
> So, as suggested by Arnd on IRC, I merged both of them to act as the base
> before adding the material for this pull-request.
> 
> About the clock nodes that should be grouped in a "clocks" container or not,
> while waiting for a clear statement by the DT maintainers, I kept the clocks
> nodes as they had been written by Boris.
> As proposed by Olof, I plan to send you a comprehensive patch that fixes this
> when Mark gives his point of view.

Ok. I've merged it into next/dt now.

	Arnd

On 23/05/2014 at 23:27:51 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote :
> On Thursday 22 May 2014, Nicolas Ferre wrote:
> > Another AT91 DT pull-request for 3.16. This one is the conversion of two more
> > SoC to Common Clock Framework (aka CCF). I identified it as a "DT" pull-request
> > but it modifies slightly a couple of files in mach-at91 (use of a configuration
> > option).
> 
> Four done, four more to go? Nice progress!
> 

I'm on it ;) I actually have two more almost ready but I will submit the
remaining four for 3.17. I don't think this is urgent enough to rush it
and I'd like to test it enough before we start removing the old clock
implementation and board files.

On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 2:55 PM, Alexandre Belloni
<alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com> wrote:
> On 23/05/2014 at 23:27:51 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote :
>> On Thursday 22 May 2014, Nicolas Ferre wrote:
>> > Another AT91 DT pull-request for 3.16. This one is the conversion of two more
>> > SoC to Common Clock Framework (aka CCF). I identified it as a "DT" pull-request
>> > but it modifies slightly a couple of files in mach-at91 (use of a configuration
>> > option).
>>
>> Four done, four more to go? Nice progress!
>>
>
> I'm on it ;) I actually have two more almost ready but I will submit the
> remaining four for 3.17. I don't think this is urgent enough to rush it
> and I'd like to test it enough before we start removing the old clock
> implementation and board files.

I think we should spend some more time discussing DTS naming instead!

(Just kidding, good progress. Agreed, let it go in when it's ready,
it's why we do frequent kernel releases)


-Olof