mbox series

[GIT,PULL,0/5] Renesas SoC updates for v5.7

Message ID 20200226110221.19288-1-geert+renesas@glider.be
Headers show
Series Renesas SoC updates for v5.7 | expand

Message

Geert Uytterhoeven Feb. 26, 2020, 11:02 a.m. UTC 
Hi arm-soc folks,

This is my first pull request for the inclusion of Renesas SoC updates
for v5.7.

It consists of 5 parts:

  [GIT PULL 1/5] Renesas ARM DT updates for v5.7

    - Miscellaneous fixes and improvements.

  [GIT PULL 2/5] Renesas ARM SoC updates for v5.7

    - Enable ARM global timer on Cortex-A9 MPCore SoCs,
    - A minor cleanup.

  [GIT PULL 3/5] Renesas ARM64 defconfig updates for v5.7

    - Restore R-Car M3-W support,
    - Enable additional support for Renesas platforms.

  [GIT PULL 4/5] Renesas ARM64 DT updates for v5.7

    - CryptoCell support for R-Car M3-W, M3-W+, M3-N, E3, and D3,
    - Miscellaneous fixes and improvements.

  [GIT PULL 5/5] Renesas driver updates for v5.7

    - Miscellaneous fixes and improvements.

Note that the first commit from "[GIT PULL 3/5] Renesas ARM64 defconfig
updates for v5.7" is also included in "[GIT PULL] Renesas fixes for
v5.6".

Thanks for pulling!

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

						Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
							    -- Linus Torvalds

Comments

Olof Johansson Feb. 27, 2020, 6:10 p.m. UTC | #1 
On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 12:02:16PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> 	Hi arm-soc folks,
> 
> This is my first pull request for the inclusion of Renesas SoC updates
> for v5.7.
> 
> It consists of 5 parts:

Hi,

Only 2 of these were sent to arm@kernel.org / soc@kernel.org: 2/5 and 5/5.
Mind checking your scripts to make sure you send them to us so they end
up in our patchwork? (And please resend the ones who weren't).


Thanks!

-Olof
Geert Uytterhoeven Feb. 27, 2020, 6:19 p.m. UTC | #2 
Hi Olof,

On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 7:10 PM Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 12:02:16PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > This is my first pull request for the inclusion of Renesas SoC updates
> > for v5.7.
> >
> > It consists of 5 parts:
>
> Only 2 of these were sent to arm@kernel.org / soc@kernel.org: 2/5 and 5/5.
> Mind checking your scripts to make sure you send them to us so they end
> up in our patchwork? (And please resend the ones who weren't).

Strange, I used a single git send-email command for the whole series.

I do see them all of them at
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-soc/list/,
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-soc/list/?series=247609 ?
Lore also has them:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-renesas-soc/20200227181018.5nixs7o7lght3mug@localhost/T/#m2ec32842569b4b4dc25d4ecda668e509edaba98b

Perhaps they got lost on the path to your inbox? Recently I had a similar
problem with some patches, which appeared at the list and patchwork, but
never in my (Gmail) inbox.

Do I still need to resend?

Thanks!

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert
Olof Johansson Feb. 27, 2020, 6:33 p.m. UTC | #3 
On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 10:19 AM Geert Uytterhoeven
<geert@linux-m68k.org> wrote:
>
> Hi Olof,
>
> On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 7:10 PM Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 12:02:16PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > > This is my first pull request for the inclusion of Renesas SoC updates
> > > for v5.7.
> > >
> > > It consists of 5 parts:
> >
> > Only 2 of these were sent to arm@kernel.org / soc@kernel.org: 2/5 and 5/5.
> > Mind checking your scripts to make sure you send them to us so they end
> > up in our patchwork? (And please resend the ones who weren't).
>
> Strange, I used a single git send-email command for the whole series.
>
> I do see them all of them at
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-soc/list/,
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-soc/list/?series=247609 ?
> Lore also has them:
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-renesas-soc/20200227181018.5nixs7o7lght3mug@localhost/T/#m2ec32842569b4b4dc25d4ecda668e509edaba98b
>
> Perhaps they got lost on the path to your inbox? Recently I had a similar
> problem with some patches, which appeared at the list and patchwork, but
> never in my (Gmail) inbox.

This is how the email I got looked like:

From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
To: "Linuxkernel+Patchwork-Soc via Email Integration"
<patchwork-soc@linux.kernel.org>
Cc: Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@gmail.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org, Geert Uytterhoeven
<geert+renesas@glider.be>
Subject: [GIT PULL 1/5] Renesas ARM DT updates for v5.7
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2020 12:02:17 +0100
Message-Id: <20200226110221.19288-2-geert+renesas@glider.be>
In-Reply-To: <20200226110221.19288-1-geert+renesas@glider.be>
References: <20200226110221.19288-1-geert+renesas@glider.be>
Precedence: Bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://linux.kernel.org/g/patchwork-soc/unsub>
Sender: patchwork-soc@linux.kernel.org
List-Id: <patchwork-soc.linux.kernel.org>
Mailing-List: list patchwork-soc@linux.kernel.org; contact
patchwork-soc+owner@linux.kernel.org
Delivered-To: mailing list <patchwork-soc@linux.kernel.org>
Reply-To: patchwork-soc+owner@linux.kernel.org


It no longer had the {arm,soc}@kernel.org recipients on it, instead
the internal-only mailing list that connects soc@kernel.org with
patchwork. Very odd. Reply-to rewrites are undesirable too.

Konstantin, anything on your side that can shed light on this? My mail
filters locally expects to see soc@kernel.org and arm@kernel.org
recipients still intact in the to-line, and it's really odd that 2 of
the 5 emails looked as expected.


-Olof