Message ID | 200907261621.01893.bzolnier@gmail.com |
---|---|
State | Not Applicable |
Delegated to: | David Miller |
Headers | show |
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: > From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com> > Subject: [PATCH] libata: add missing NULL pointer check to ata_eh_reset() > >>From Dan's list: > > drivers/ata/libata-eh.c +2403 ata_eh_reset(80) warning: variable derefenced before check 'slave' > > Please note that this is _not_ a real bug at the moment since ata_eh_context > structure is embedded into ata_list structure and the code alwas checks for > 'slave' before accessing 'sehc'. > > Anyway lets add missing check and always have a valid 'sehc' pointer (which > makes code easier to understand and prevents introducing some possible bugs > in the future). > > Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <error27@gmail.com> > Cc: corbet@lwn.net > Cc: eteo@redhat.com > Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com> > --- > drivers/ata/libata-eh.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) applied to #upstream-fixes -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Index: b/drivers/ata/libata-eh.c =================================================================== --- a/drivers/ata/libata-eh.c +++ b/drivers/ata/libata-eh.c @@ -2329,7 +2329,7 @@ int ata_eh_reset(struct ata_link *link, struct ata_port *ap = link->ap; struct ata_link *slave = ap->slave_link; struct ata_eh_context *ehc = &link->eh_context; - struct ata_eh_context *sehc = &slave->eh_context; + struct ata_eh_context *sehc = slave ? &slave->eh_context : NULL; unsigned int *classes = ehc->classes; unsigned int lflags = link->flags; int verbose = !(ehc->i.flags & ATA_EHI_QUIET);