Message ID | yxymqbpeuhq52w3ie5nl5pkoojjuybaeodqtrd6uhe2rkmfhfb@3dqr6vefsdxh |
---|---|
State | Accepted |
Headers | show |
Series | [GIT,PULL] i2c-host for v6.11 | expand |
Hi Andi, > Not a massive pull request. The majority of changes relate to the > naming convention updates. Other than that, the holiday period > has given us some slack in the number of patches queued for this > pull request. Thanks, pulled! > There is still one pending documentation fix required for an > issue reported by Stephen that I haven't noticed. I need to add > the documentation check to my workflow. If you don't have the > bandwidth, I can take care of it. I applied the fix on top to silence the warning now in linux-next. > I also have a pending patch for a v2 pull request from Hans de > Goede ("i2c: i801: Use a different adapter name for IDF > adapters") that is waiting for precedence. Can these patches be included, too? I think they are good to go. http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/linux-i2c/list/?series=410673 Or are there issues with them? > I wish you a great rest of the weekend, Thank you! Same to you (and everyone else!) Wolfram
> Can these patches be included, too? I think they are good to go. > > http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/linux-i2c/list/?series=410673 Oh, and these: http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/linux-i2c/list/?series=411205 Or shall I take them?
Hi Wolfram, > > There is still one pending documentation fix required for an > > issue reported by Stephen that I haven't noticed. I need to add > > the documentation check to my workflow. If you don't have the > > bandwidth, I can take care of it. > > I applied the fix on top to silence the warning now in linux-next. Cool! Thanks :-) > > I also have a pending patch for a v2 pull request from Hans de > > Goede ("i2c: i801: Use a different adapter name for IDF > > adapters") that is waiting for precedence. > > Can these patches be included, too? I think they are good to go. > > http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/linux-i2c/list/?series=410673 I will include them, thanks! Andi
> > Can these patches be included, too? I think they are good to go. > > > > http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/linux-i2c/list/?series=410673 > > Oh, and these: > > http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/linux-i2c/list/?series=411205 > > Or shall I take them? This was in my backlog, will take them with the requested fix. Andi