Message ID | 22387590.3491366329664571.JavaMail.weblogic@epv6ml11 |
---|---|
State | Accepted |
Headers | show |
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 12:01:04AM +0000, EUNBONG SONG wrote: > > I think HZ/50 is better than 2 for adapter timeout. Basically OK. But why HZ/50? Most drivers use HZ. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-octeon.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-octeon.c index 935585e..ca489f3 100644 --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-octeon.c +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-octeon.c @@ -440,7 +440,7 @@ static struct i2c_adapter octeon_i2c_ops = { .owner = THIS_MODULE, .name = "OCTEON adapter", .algo = &octeon_i2c_algo, - .timeout = 2, + .timeout = HZ/50, }; /**
I think HZ/50 is better than 2 for adapter timeout. Signed-off-by: Eunbong Song <eunb.song@samsung.com> --- drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-octeon.c | 2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) -- 1.7.0.1