@@ -97,17 +97,17 @@ static void i2c_amd_cmd_completion(struct amd_i2c_common *i2c_common)
static int i2c_amd_check_cmd_completion(struct amd_i2c_dev *i2c_dev)
{
struct amd_i2c_common *i2c_common = &i2c_dev->common;
- unsigned long timeout;
+ unsigned long time_left;
- timeout = wait_for_completion_timeout(&i2c_dev->cmd_complete,
- i2c_dev->adap.timeout);
+ time_left = wait_for_completion_timeout(&i2c_dev->cmd_complete,
+ i2c_dev->adap.timeout);
if ((i2c_common->reqcmd == i2c_read ||
i2c_common->reqcmd == i2c_write) &&
i2c_common->msg->len > 32)
i2c_amd_dma_unmap(i2c_common);
- if (timeout == 0) {
+ if (time_left == 0) {
amd_mp2_rw_timeout(i2c_common);
return -ETIMEDOUT;
}
There is a confusing pattern in the kernel to use a variable named 'timeout' to store the result of wait_for_completion_timeout() causing patterns like: timeout = wait_for_completion_timeout(...) if (!timeout) return -ETIMEDOUT; with all kinds of permutations. Use 'time_left' as a variable to make the code self explaining. Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com> --- drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-amd-mp2-plat.c | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)