From patchwork Mon Aug 22 09:10:50 2022 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Luca Ceresoli X-Patchwork-Id: 1668656 X-Patchwork-Delegate: patchwork@peda.user.lysator.liu.se Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@legolas.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: legolas.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=vger.kernel.org (client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; helo=out1.vger.email; envelope-from=linux-i2c-owner@vger.kernel.org; receiver=) Authentication-Results: legolas.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=bootlin.com header.i=@bootlin.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=gm1 header.b=Sj/rhWYF; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email [IPv6:2620:137:e000::1:20]) by legolas.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4MB66Y6Hl8z1yg7 for ; Mon, 22 Aug 2022 19:11:17 +1000 (AEST) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S234270AbiHVJLO (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Aug 2022 05:11:14 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:58822 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S234223AbiHVJLF (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Aug 2022 05:11:05 -0400 Received: from relay11.mail.gandi.net (relay11.mail.gandi.net [217.70.178.231]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9EE352F394; Mon, 22 Aug 2022 02:11:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from booty.fritz.box (unknown [77.244.183.192]) (Authenticated sender: luca.ceresoli@bootlin.com) by mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 680DA100015; Mon, 22 Aug 2022 09:10:59 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bootlin.com; s=gm1; t=1661159460; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=Zj/2REijE3zPLLtMEabFdtuhZMR0wF7GWbZ6HPCLFdc=; b=Sj/rhWYF57wjxSrCwt56XER4Hx8VgWt3V2KKTL2W0vs6kgsukNavV6b6IqZStp9mXZogeE HOWm00d91osgpMkCQPNJw35eIKyiV7Ex0sl8ZADGTjAPtjRS1f+1wvybN5XBC17w22qPn9 XxeymR+v5+FQ/kAMH+NWTqyg0pFtPwIub9dZqBk26Jc4GQC7KCWIKJuuHuZasnXitx9VVb H90kjwDtrgvLtAbKtWW0JNL8DJGERN2Lfn7xHDNEhkf4IBLiCrWjlwk2pCRdaRmvuTy3km xqK93v2xhmbb/2ZjRF3p0mHGtznv+xE6b16MJd9c5PuqX1+5R1lcRbFgL05MSQ== From: luca.ceresoli@bootlin.com To: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org Cc: Luca Ceresoli , Wolfram Sang , Peter Rosin , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Bagas Sanjaya Subject: [PATCH v2 3/3] docs: i2c: i2c-topology: fix typo Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2022 11:10:50 +0200 Message-Id: <20220822091050.47099-4-luca.ceresoli@bootlin.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.34.1 In-Reply-To: <20220822091050.47099-1-luca.ceresoli@bootlin.com> References: <20220822091050.47099-1-luca.ceresoli@bootlin.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org From: Luca Ceresoli "intension" should have probably been "intention", however "intent" seems even better. Reported-by: Bagas Sanjaya Signed-off-by: Luca Ceresoli Acked-by: Peter Rosin --- Changed in v2: - this patch is new in v2 --- Documentation/i2c/i2c-topology.rst | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/Documentation/i2c/i2c-topology.rst b/Documentation/i2c/i2c-topology.rst index 6f2da7f386fd..65ed76bc979f 100644 --- a/Documentation/i2c/i2c-topology.rst +++ b/Documentation/i2c/i2c-topology.rst @@ -102,7 +102,7 @@ When using a mux-locked mux, be aware of the following restrictions: I.e. the select-transfer-deselect transaction targeting e.g. device address 0x42 behind mux-one may be interleaved with a similar operation targeting device address 0x42 behind mux-two. The - intension with such a topology would in this hypothetical example + intent with such a topology would in this hypothetical example be that mux-one and mux-two should not be selected simultaneously, but mux-locked muxes do not guarantee that in all topologies.