Message ID | 20200525095934.3058-1-wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com |
---|---|
State | Accepted |
Headers | show |
Series | [1/2] i2c: slave-eeprom: skip useless initialization | expand |
On Mon, May 25, 2020 at 11:59:33AM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote: > We have a kzalloced struct, no need to init to 0. > > Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com> Applied to for-next, thanks!
diff --git a/drivers/i2c/i2c-slave-eeprom.c b/drivers/i2c/i2c-slave-eeprom.c index 787fdb7f332f..6684852818ac 100644 --- a/drivers/i2c/i2c-slave-eeprom.c +++ b/drivers/i2c/i2c-slave-eeprom.c @@ -152,7 +152,6 @@ static int i2c_slave_eeprom_probe(struct i2c_client *client, const struct i2c_de if (!eeprom) return -ENOMEM; - eeprom->idx_write_cnt = 0; eeprom->num_address_bytes = flag_addr16 ? 2 : 1; eeprom->address_mask = size - 1; eeprom->read_only = FIELD_GET(I2C_SLAVE_FLAG_RO, id->driver_data);
We have a kzalloced struct, no need to init to 0. Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com> --- drivers/i2c/i2c-slave-eeprom.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)