From patchwork Thu Jan 14 18:57:36 2021 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Baruch Siach X-Patchwork-Id: 1426622 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@bilbo.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=vger.kernel.org (client-ip=23.128.96.18; helo=vger.kernel.org; envelope-from=linux-gpio-owner@vger.kernel.org; receiver=) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DGtrW05Wmz9sVk for ; Fri, 15 Jan 2021 05:58:51 +1100 (AEDT) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728009AbhANS6h (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Jan 2021 13:58:37 -0500 Received: from guitar.tcltek.co.il ([192.115.133.116]:47448 "EHLO mx.tkos.co.il" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726287AbhANS6h (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Jan 2021 13:58:37 -0500 Received: from tarshish.tkos.co.il (unknown [10.0.8.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx.tkos.co.il (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1637C440820; Thu, 14 Jan 2021 20:57:54 +0200 (IST) From: Baruch Siach To: Thierry Reding , =?utf-8?q?Uwe_Kleine-K=C3=B6n?= =?utf-8?q?ig?= , Lee Jones , Linus Walleij , Bartosz Golaszewski Cc: Baruch Siach , Andrew Lunn , Gregory Clement , Russell King , Sebastian Hesselbarth , Thomas Petazzoni , Chris Packham , Sascha Hauer , Ralph Sennhauser , linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: [PATCH v3 4/5] gpio: mvebu: don't limit pwm period/duty_cycle to UINT_MAX Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2021 20:57:36 +0200 Message-Id: X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.29.2 In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org PWM on/off registers are limited to UINT_MAX. However the state period and duty_cycle fields are ns values of type u64. There is no reason to limit them to UINT_MAX. Reported-by: Uwe Kleine-König Reviewed-by: Uwe Kleine-König Signed-off-by: Baruch Siach --- drivers/gpio/gpio-mvebu.c | 8 ++------ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-mvebu.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-mvebu.c index 8673ba77af5a..6b017854ce61 100644 --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-mvebu.c +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-mvebu.c @@ -669,9 +669,7 @@ static void mvebu_pwm_get_state(struct pwm_chip *chip, regmap_read(mvpwm->regs, mvebu_pwmreg_blink_on_duration(mvpwm), &u); val = (unsigned long long) u * NSEC_PER_SEC; val = DIV_ROUND_UP_ULL(val, mvpwm->clk_rate); - if (val > UINT_MAX) - state->duty_cycle = UINT_MAX; - else if (val) + if (val) state->duty_cycle = val; else state->duty_cycle = 1; @@ -681,9 +679,7 @@ static void mvebu_pwm_get_state(struct pwm_chip *chip, val += (unsigned long long) u; /* period = on + off duration */ val *= NSEC_PER_SEC; val = DIV_ROUND_UP_ULL(val, mvpwm->clk_rate); - if (val > UINT_MAX) - state->period = UINT_MAX; - else if (val) + if (val) state->period = val; else state->period = 1;