Message ID | d707c657502b87a7f8e70c7b44492bc95939f9f6.1476200742.git-series.maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 11:46 PM, Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> wrote: > Even though the our binding had the assumption that the allwinner,pull and > allwinner,drive properties were optional, the code never took that into > account. > > Fix that. > > Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> > --- > drivers/pinctrl/sunxi/pinctrl-sunxi.c | 53 ++++++++++++++++++++-------- > 1 file changed, 39 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/sunxi/pinctrl-sunxi.c b/drivers/pinctrl/sunxi/pinctrl-sunxi.c > index 6f6f1e0011e2..2ee8d48ed5d3 100644 > --- a/drivers/pinctrl/sunxi/pinctrl-sunxi.c > +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/sunxi/pinctrl-sunxi.c > @@ -218,20 +218,29 @@ static unsigned long *sunxi_pctrl_build_pin_config(struct device_node *node, > { > unsigned long *pinconfig; > unsigned int configlen = 0, idx = 0; > + int ret; > > if (sunxi_pctrl_has_drive_prop(node)) > configlen++; > if (sunxi_pctrl_has_bias_prop(node)) > configlen++; > > + /* > + * If we don't have any configuration, bail out > + */ > + if (!configlen) > + return NULL; > + > pinconfig = kzalloc(configlen * sizeof(*pinconfig), GFP_KERNEL); > if (!pinconfig) > - return NULL; > + return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM); > > if (sunxi_pctrl_has_drive_prop(node)) { > int drive = sunxi_pctrl_parse_drive_prop(node); > - if (drive < 0) > + if (drive < 0) { > + ret = drive; > goto err_free; > + } > > pinconfig[idx++] = pinconf_to_config_packed(PIN_CONFIG_DRIVE_STRENGTH, > drive); > @@ -239,8 +248,10 @@ static unsigned long *sunxi_pctrl_build_pin_config(struct device_node *node, > > if (sunxi_pctrl_has_bias_prop(node)) { > int pull = sunxi_pctrl_parse_bias_prop(node); > - if (pull < 0) > + if (pull < 0) { > + ret = pull; > goto err_free; > + } > > pinconfig[idx++] = pinconf_to_config_packed(pull, 0); > } > @@ -251,7 +262,7 @@ static unsigned long *sunxi_pctrl_build_pin_config(struct device_node *node, > > err_free: > kfree(pinconfig); > - return NULL; > + return ERR_PTR(ret); > } > > static int sunxi_pctrl_dt_node_to_map(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, > @@ -285,7 +296,10 @@ static int sunxi_pctrl_dt_node_to_map(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, > > /* > * We have two maps for each pin: one for the function, one > - * for the configuration (bias, strength, etc) > + * for the configuration (bias, strength, etc). > + * > + * We might be slightly overshooting, since we might not have > + * any configuration. > */ > nmaps = npins * 2; > *map = kmalloc(nmaps * sizeof(struct pinctrl_map), GFP_KERNEL); > @@ -293,8 +307,8 @@ static int sunxi_pctrl_dt_node_to_map(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, > return -ENOMEM; > > pinconfig = sunxi_pctrl_build_pin_config(node, &configlen); > - if (!pinconfig) { > - ret = -EINVAL; > + if (IS_ERR(pinconfig)) { > + ret = PTR_ERR(pinconfig); > goto err_free_map; > } > > @@ -321,15 +335,24 @@ static int sunxi_pctrl_dt_node_to_map(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, > > i++; > > - (*map)[i].type = PIN_MAP_TYPE_CONFIGS_GROUP; > - (*map)[i].data.configs.group_or_pin = group; > - (*map)[i].data.configs.configs = pinconfig; > - (*map)[i].data.configs.num_configs = configlen; > - > - i++; > + if (pinconfig) { > + (*map)[i].type = PIN_MAP_TYPE_CONFIGS_GROUP; > + (*map)[i].data.configs.group_or_pin = group; > + (*map)[i].data.configs.configs = pinconfig; > + (*map)[i].data.configs.num_configs = configlen; > + i++; > + } > } > > - *num_maps = nmaps; > + *num_maps = i; > + > + /* > + * We know have the number of maps we need, we can resize our > + * map array > + */ > + *map = krealloc(*map, i * sizeof(struct pinctrl_map), GFP_KERNEL); > + if (!map) > + return -ENOMEM; > > return 0; > > @@ -342,6 +365,8 @@ static void sunxi_pctrl_dt_free_map(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, > struct pinctrl_map *map, > unsigned num_maps) > { > + unsigned long *pinconfig; This looks out of place and context? Otherwise, Acked-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org> > + > /* All the maps have the same pin config, free only the first one */ > kfree(map[0].data.configs.configs); > kfree(map); > -- > git-series 0.8.10 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 03:47:03PM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote: > > @@ -342,6 +365,8 @@ static void sunxi_pctrl_dt_free_map(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, > > struct pinctrl_map *map, > > unsigned num_maps) > > { > > + unsigned long *pinconfig; > > This looks out of place and context? Yeah, sorry, it's just a leftover from the previous version. This has been removed. Thanks! Maxime
On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 2:16 PM, Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> wrote: > On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 03:47:03PM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote: >> > @@ -342,6 +365,8 @@ static void sunxi_pctrl_dt_free_map(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, >> > struct pinctrl_map *map, >> > unsigned num_maps) >> > { >> > + unsigned long *pinconfig; >> >> This looks out of place and context? > > Yeah, sorry, it's just a leftover from the previous version. This has > been removed. Do you mean you will send a v3 of this series? OK stopping to apply then. But I have already applied patches 1, 2 and 3 so just resend the rest :) Yours, Linus Walleij -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Hi Linus, On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 02:52:54PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 2:16 PM, Maxime Ripard > <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 03:47:03PM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote: > >> > @@ -342,6 +365,8 @@ static void sunxi_pctrl_dt_free_map(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, > >> > struct pinctrl_map *map, > >> > unsigned num_maps) > >> > { > >> > + unsigned long *pinconfig; > >> > >> This looks out of place and context? > > > > Yeah, sorry, it's just a leftover from the previous version. This has > > been removed. > > Do you mean you will send a v3 of this series? Yes, I was waiting for your input to do that, but I guess you're ok with it :) > OK stopping to apply then. > > But I have already applied patches 1, 2 and 3 so just resend the rest :) Ack, I'll send it in a moment. Thanks! Maxime
diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/sunxi/pinctrl-sunxi.c b/drivers/pinctrl/sunxi/pinctrl-sunxi.c index 6f6f1e0011e2..2ee8d48ed5d3 100644 --- a/drivers/pinctrl/sunxi/pinctrl-sunxi.c +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/sunxi/pinctrl-sunxi.c @@ -218,20 +218,29 @@ static unsigned long *sunxi_pctrl_build_pin_config(struct device_node *node, { unsigned long *pinconfig; unsigned int configlen = 0, idx = 0; + int ret; if (sunxi_pctrl_has_drive_prop(node)) configlen++; if (sunxi_pctrl_has_bias_prop(node)) configlen++; + /* + * If we don't have any configuration, bail out + */ + if (!configlen) + return NULL; + pinconfig = kzalloc(configlen * sizeof(*pinconfig), GFP_KERNEL); if (!pinconfig) - return NULL; + return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM); if (sunxi_pctrl_has_drive_prop(node)) { int drive = sunxi_pctrl_parse_drive_prop(node); - if (drive < 0) + if (drive < 0) { + ret = drive; goto err_free; + } pinconfig[idx++] = pinconf_to_config_packed(PIN_CONFIG_DRIVE_STRENGTH, drive); @@ -239,8 +248,10 @@ static unsigned long *sunxi_pctrl_build_pin_config(struct device_node *node, if (sunxi_pctrl_has_bias_prop(node)) { int pull = sunxi_pctrl_parse_bias_prop(node); - if (pull < 0) + if (pull < 0) { + ret = pull; goto err_free; + } pinconfig[idx++] = pinconf_to_config_packed(pull, 0); } @@ -251,7 +262,7 @@ static unsigned long *sunxi_pctrl_build_pin_config(struct device_node *node, err_free: kfree(pinconfig); - return NULL; + return ERR_PTR(ret); } static int sunxi_pctrl_dt_node_to_map(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, @@ -285,7 +296,10 @@ static int sunxi_pctrl_dt_node_to_map(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, /* * We have two maps for each pin: one for the function, one - * for the configuration (bias, strength, etc) + * for the configuration (bias, strength, etc). + * + * We might be slightly overshooting, since we might not have + * any configuration. */ nmaps = npins * 2; *map = kmalloc(nmaps * sizeof(struct pinctrl_map), GFP_KERNEL); @@ -293,8 +307,8 @@ static int sunxi_pctrl_dt_node_to_map(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, return -ENOMEM; pinconfig = sunxi_pctrl_build_pin_config(node, &configlen); - if (!pinconfig) { - ret = -EINVAL; + if (IS_ERR(pinconfig)) { + ret = PTR_ERR(pinconfig); goto err_free_map; } @@ -321,15 +335,24 @@ static int sunxi_pctrl_dt_node_to_map(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, i++; - (*map)[i].type = PIN_MAP_TYPE_CONFIGS_GROUP; - (*map)[i].data.configs.group_or_pin = group; - (*map)[i].data.configs.configs = pinconfig; - (*map)[i].data.configs.num_configs = configlen; - - i++; + if (pinconfig) { + (*map)[i].type = PIN_MAP_TYPE_CONFIGS_GROUP; + (*map)[i].data.configs.group_or_pin = group; + (*map)[i].data.configs.configs = pinconfig; + (*map)[i].data.configs.num_configs = configlen; + i++; + } } - *num_maps = nmaps; + *num_maps = i; + + /* + * We know have the number of maps we need, we can resize our + * map array + */ + *map = krealloc(*map, i * sizeof(struct pinctrl_map), GFP_KERNEL); + if (!map) + return -ENOMEM; return 0; @@ -342,6 +365,8 @@ static void sunxi_pctrl_dt_free_map(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, struct pinctrl_map *map, unsigned num_maps) { + unsigned long *pinconfig; + /* All the maps have the same pin config, free only the first one */ kfree(map[0].data.configs.configs); kfree(map);
Even though the our binding had the assumption that the allwinner,pull and allwinner,drive properties were optional, the code never took that into account. Fix that. Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> --- drivers/pinctrl/sunxi/pinctrl-sunxi.c | 53 ++++++++++++++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 39 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)