Message ID | 4db704460547d715a1d9cf86d51612b347e38a7b.1606748993.git.baruch@tkos.co.il |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
Series | [v2] gpio: mvebu: fix potential user-after-free on probe | expand |
On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 05:09:53PM +0200, Baruch Siach wrote: > When mvebu_pwm_probe() fails IRQ domain is not released. Goto the > err_domain label on failure to release IRQ domain. > > Fixes: 757642f9a584 ("gpio: mvebu: Add limited PWM support") > Reported-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> > Signed-off-by: Baruch Siach <baruch@tkos.co.il> > --- > v2: Don't leak pwm resources (Uwe Kleine-König) > > This is split out of the "gpio: mvebu: Armada 8K/7K PWM support" series. > I'll rebase the series v2 on top on this fix. > --- > drivers/gpio/gpio-mvebu.c | 7 +++++-- > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-mvebu.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-mvebu.c > index 433e2c3f3fd5..c53ed975a180 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-mvebu.c > +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-mvebu.c > @@ -1255,8 +1255,11 @@ static int mvebu_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > } > > /* Some MVEBU SoCs have simple PWM support for GPIO lines */ > - if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PWM)) > - return mvebu_pwm_probe(pdev, mvchip, id); > + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PWM)) { > + err = mvebu_pwm_probe(pdev, mvchip, id); > + if (err) > + goto err_domain; I only looked quickly, but I wonder if you need to undo irq_alloc_domain_generic_chips(), too?! Best regards Uwe
Hi Uwe, (+ tglx) On Mon, Nov 30 2020, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 05:09:53PM +0200, Baruch Siach wrote: >> When mvebu_pwm_probe() fails IRQ domain is not released. Goto the >> err_domain label on failure to release IRQ domain. >> >> Fixes: 757642f9a584 ("gpio: mvebu: Add limited PWM support") >> Reported-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> >> Signed-off-by: Baruch Siach <baruch@tkos.co.il> >> --- >> v2: Don't leak pwm resources (Uwe Kleine-König) >> >> This is split out of the "gpio: mvebu: Armada 8K/7K PWM support" series. >> I'll rebase the series v2 on top on this fix. >> --- >> drivers/gpio/gpio-mvebu.c | 7 +++++-- >> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-mvebu.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-mvebu.c >> index 433e2c3f3fd5..c53ed975a180 100644 >> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-mvebu.c >> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-mvebu.c >> @@ -1255,8 +1255,11 @@ static int mvebu_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) >> } >> >> /* Some MVEBU SoCs have simple PWM support for GPIO lines */ >> - if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PWM)) >> - return mvebu_pwm_probe(pdev, mvchip, id); >> + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PWM)) { >> + err = mvebu_pwm_probe(pdev, mvchip, id); >> + if (err) >> + goto err_domain; > > I only looked quickly, but I wonder if you need to undo > irq_alloc_domain_generic_chips(), too?! So it seems. __irq_alloc_domain_generic_chips() calls kzalloc() for the gc field of irq_domain. But I could not find any code that releases this allocation. These drivers call irq_alloc_domain_generic_chips(), but do not release gc on failure: drivers/irqchip/irq-ingenic-tcu.c drivers/irqchip/irq-orion.c drivers/irqchip/irq-renesas-irqc.c drivers/irqchip/irq-sunxi-nmi.c drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-rockchip.c Some of them apparently skip the cleanup because the system would be unusable anyway. But most of them call irq_domain_remove() on failure. Thomas, what is the right thing to do here? Should we just call kfree(mvchip->domain->gc); directly to release the allocation? Thanks, baruch
diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-mvebu.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-mvebu.c index 433e2c3f3fd5..c53ed975a180 100644 --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-mvebu.c +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-mvebu.c @@ -1255,8 +1255,11 @@ static int mvebu_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) } /* Some MVEBU SoCs have simple PWM support for GPIO lines */ - if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PWM)) - return mvebu_pwm_probe(pdev, mvchip, id); + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PWM)) { + err = mvebu_pwm_probe(pdev, mvchip, id); + if (err) + goto err_domain; + } return 0;
When mvebu_pwm_probe() fails IRQ domain is not released. Goto the err_domain label on failure to release IRQ domain. Fixes: 757642f9a584 ("gpio: mvebu: Add limited PWM support") Reported-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> Signed-off-by: Baruch Siach <baruch@tkos.co.il> --- v2: Don't leak pwm resources (Uwe Kleine-König) This is split out of the "gpio: mvebu: Armada 8K/7K PWM support" series. I'll rebase the series v2 on top on this fix. --- drivers/gpio/gpio-mvebu.c | 7 +++++-- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)