| Message ID | 20230314154117.477138-1-robh@kernel.org |
|---|---|
| State | New |
| Headers | show |
| Series | [v2] gpio: Use of_property_read_bool() for boolean properties | expand |
On Tue, Mar 14, 2023 at 4:41 PM Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> wrote: > It is preferred to use typed property access functions (i.e. > of_property_read_<type> functions) rather than low-level > of_get_property/of_find_property functions for reading properties. > Convert reading boolean properties to to of_property_read_bool(). > > Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Yours, Linus Walleij
On Tue, Mar 14, 2023 at 4:41 PM Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> wrote: > > It is preferred to use typed property access functions (i.e. > of_property_read_<type> functions) rather than low-level > of_get_property/of_find_property functions for reading properties. > Convert reading boolean properties to to of_property_read_bool(). > > Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> > --- > v2: > - Actually use of_property_read_bool() as the commit msg says instead > of of_property_present() > --- > drivers/gpio/gpio-stp-xway.c | 2 +- > drivers/gpio/gpio-tb10x.c | 2 +- > 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-stp-xway.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-stp-xway.c > index 0ce1543426a4..4750ea34204c 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-stp-xway.c > +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-stp-xway.c > @@ -292,7 +292,7 @@ static int xway_stp_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > } > > /* check which edge trigger we should use, default to a falling edge */ > - if (!of_find_property(pdev->dev.of_node, "lantiq,rising", NULL)) > + if (!of_property_read_bool(pdev->dev.of_node, "lantiq,rising")) > chip->edge = XWAY_STP_FALLING; > > clk = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, NULL); > diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-tb10x.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-tb10x.c > index de6afa3f9716..78f8790168ae 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-tb10x.c > +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-tb10x.c > @@ -167,7 +167,7 @@ static int tb10x_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > > platform_set_drvdata(pdev, tb10x_gpio); > > - if (of_find_property(np, "interrupt-controller", NULL)) { > + if (of_property_read_bool(np, "interrupt-controller")) { > struct irq_chip_generic *gc; > > ret = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0); > -- > 2.39.2 > Applied, thanks! Bart
diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-stp-xway.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-stp-xway.c index 0ce1543426a4..4750ea34204c 100644 --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-stp-xway.c +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-stp-xway.c @@ -292,7 +292,7 @@ static int xway_stp_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) } /* check which edge trigger we should use, default to a falling edge */ - if (!of_find_property(pdev->dev.of_node, "lantiq,rising", NULL)) + if (!of_property_read_bool(pdev->dev.of_node, "lantiq,rising")) chip->edge = XWAY_STP_FALLING; clk = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, NULL); diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-tb10x.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-tb10x.c index de6afa3f9716..78f8790168ae 100644 --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-tb10x.c +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-tb10x.c @@ -167,7 +167,7 @@ static int tb10x_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) platform_set_drvdata(pdev, tb10x_gpio); - if (of_find_property(np, "interrupt-controller", NULL)) { + if (of_property_read_bool(np, "interrupt-controller")) { struct irq_chip_generic *gc; ret = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
It is preferred to use typed property access functions (i.e. of_property_read_<type> functions) rather than low-level of_get_property/of_find_property functions for reading properties. Convert reading boolean properties to to of_property_read_bool(). Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> --- v2: - Actually use of_property_read_bool() as the commit msg says instead of of_property_present() --- drivers/gpio/gpio-stp-xway.c | 2 +- drivers/gpio/gpio-tb10x.c | 2 +- 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)