diff mbox series

[2/2] dt-bindings: gpio: pca953x: increase allowed length for gpio-line-names

Message ID 20210113194952.104734-2-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
State New
Headers show
Series [1/2] gpio: pca953x: Add support for pca9506 | expand

Commit Message

Uwe Kleine-König Jan. 13, 2021, 7:49 p.m. UTC
Some supported chips (e.g. pca9505) support 40 chips. To be able to give
each line a name the length of the gpio-line-names property must be
allowed to contain up to 40 entries.

Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
---
 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio-pca95xx.yaml | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

Comments

Linus Walleij Jan. 18, 2021, 2:36 p.m. UTC | #1
On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 8:50 PM Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> wrote:

> Some supported chips (e.g. pca9505) support 40 chips. To be able to give

40 lines I guess? (No big deal. Everyone understand what you mean.)

> each line a name the length of the gpio-line-names property must be
> allowed to contain up to 40 entries.
>
> Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>

Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>

Yours,
Linus Walleij
Uwe Kleine-König Jan. 18, 2021, 2:57 p.m. UTC | #2
On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 03:36:08PM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 8:50 PM Uwe Kleine-König
> <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> wrote:
> 
> > Some supported chips (e.g. pca9505) support 40 chips. To be able to give
> 
> 40 lines I guess? (No big deal. Everyone understand what you mean.)

Yes, I noticed that myself and fixed that in v2
(https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210115164658.187681-1-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de)

> > each line a name the length of the gpio-line-names property must be
> > allowed to contain up to 40 entries.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
> 
> Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>

Who will pick up this series (preferable v2 instead of this (implicit)
v1)? Will they notice this Reviewed-by?

Thanks
Uwe
Linus Walleij Jan. 22, 2021, 9:50 a.m. UTC | #3
On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 3:57 PM Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> wrote:

> Who will pick up this series (preferable v2 instead of this (implicit)
> v1)? Will they notice this Reviewed-by?

Bartosz is collecting GPIO patches to Torvalds for this merge
window.

Yours,
Linus Walleij
Bartosz Golaszewski Jan. 22, 2021, 11:53 a.m. UTC | #4
On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 10:50 AM Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 3:57 PM Uwe Kleine-König
> <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> wrote:
>
> > Who will pick up this series (preferable v2 instead of this (implicit)
> > v1)? Will they notice this Reviewed-by?
>
> Bartosz is collecting GPIO patches to Torvalds for this merge
> window.
>
> Yours,
> Linus Walleij

I already have v2 of this series in my tree.

Bartosz
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio-pca95xx.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio-pca95xx.yaml
index cdd7744b8723..246bae53be8b 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio-pca95xx.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio-pca95xx.yaml
@@ -71,7 +71,7 @@  properties:
 
   gpio-line-names:
     minItems: 1
-    maxItems: 32
+    maxItems: 40
 
   interrupts:
     maxItems: 1