Message ID | 20191115125551.31061-1-olteanv@gmail.com |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
Series | gpio: mpc8xxx: Don't overwrite default irq_set_type callback | expand |
> The per-SoC devtype structures can contain their own callbacks that > overwrite mpc8xxx_gpio_devtype_default. > > The clear intention is that mpc8xxx_irq_set_type is used in case the > SoC > does not specify a more specific callback. But what happens is that if > the SoC doesn't specify one, its .irq_set_type is de-facto NULL, and > this overwrites mpc8xxx_irq_set_type to a no-op. This means that the > following SoCs are affected: > > - fsl,mpc8572-gpio > - fsl,ls1028a-gpio > - fsl,ls1088a-gpio > > On these boards, the irq_set_type does exactly nothing, and the GPIO > controller keeps its GPICR register in the hardware-default state. On > the LS1028A, that is ACTIVE_BOTH, which means 2 interrupts are raised > even if the IRQ client requests LEVEL_HIGH. Another implication is that > the IRQs are not checked (e.g. level-triggered interrupts are not > rejected, although they are not supported). > > Fixes: 82e39b0d8566 ("gpio: mpc8xxx: handle differences between > incarnations at a single place") > Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Tested-by: Michael Walle <michael@walle.cc>
On Fri, Nov 15, 2019 at 1:56 PM Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com> wrote: > From: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> > > The per-SoC devtype structures can contain their own callbacks that > overwrite mpc8xxx_gpio_devtype_default. > > The clear intention is that mpc8xxx_irq_set_type is used in case the SoC > does not specify a more specific callback. But what happens is that if > the SoC doesn't specify one, its .irq_set_type is de-facto NULL, and > this overwrites mpc8xxx_irq_set_type to a no-op. This means that the > following SoCs are affected: > > - fsl,mpc8572-gpio > - fsl,ls1028a-gpio > - fsl,ls1088a-gpio > > On these boards, the irq_set_type does exactly nothing, and the GPIO > controller keeps its GPICR register in the hardware-default state. On > the LS1028A, that is ACTIVE_BOTH, which means 2 interrupts are raised > even if the IRQ client requests LEVEL_HIGH. Another implication is that > the IRQs are not checked (e.g. level-triggered interrupts are not > rejected, although they are not supported). > > Fixes: 82e39b0d8566 ("gpio: mpc8xxx: handle differences between incarnations at a single place") > Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Patch applied with Michael's Tested tag. Yours, Linus Walleij
diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-mpc8xxx.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-mpc8xxx.c index 16a47de29c94..d88ebefb8147 100644 --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-mpc8xxx.c +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-mpc8xxx.c @@ -377,7 +377,8 @@ static int mpc8xxx_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) * It's assumed that only a single type of gpio controller is available * on the current machine, so overwriting global data is fine. */ - mpc8xxx_irq_chip.irq_set_type = devtype->irq_set_type; + if (devtype->irq_set_type) + mpc8xxx_irq_chip.irq_set_type = devtype->irq_set_type; if (devtype->gpio_dir_out) gc->direction_output = devtype->gpio_dir_out;