From patchwork Sat Aug 26 17:47:07 2023 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Kemeng Shi X-Patchwork-Id: 1826381 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@legolas.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: legolas.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=ozlabs.org (client-ip=2404:9400:2221:ea00::3; helo=gandalf.ozlabs.org; envelope-from=srs0=sxb8=el=vger.kernel.org=linux-ext4-owner@ozlabs.org; receiver=patchwork.ozlabs.org) Received: from gandalf.ozlabs.org (mail.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2404:9400:2221:ea00::3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (secp384r1)) (No client certificate requested) by legolas.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4RXsSk4yfjz1yg9 for ; Sat, 26 Aug 2023 19:48:06 +1000 (AEST) Received: from gandalf.ozlabs.org (mail.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2404:9400:2221:ea00::3]) by gandalf.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4RXsSk4Wy1z4wxm for ; Sat, 26 Aug 2023 19:48:06 +1000 (AEST) Received: by gandalf.ozlabs.org (Postfix) id 4RXsSk4TTDz4x0T; Sat, 26 Aug 2023 19:48:06 +1000 (AEST) Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: gandalf.ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=huaweicloud.com Authentication-Results: gandalf.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=vger.kernel.org (client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; helo=out1.vger.email; envelope-from=linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org; receiver=ozlabs.org) Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email [IPv6:2620:137:e000::1:20]) by gandalf.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4RXsSk4Q2Mz4wxm for ; Sat, 26 Aug 2023 19:48:06 +1000 (AEST) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232618AbjHZJr5 (ORCPT ); Sat, 26 Aug 2023 05:47:57 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:55390 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232533AbjHZJra (ORCPT ); Sat, 26 Aug 2023 05:47:30 -0400 Received: from dggsgout12.his.huawei.com (dggsgout12.his.huawei.com [45.249.212.56]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6B71C172D; Sat, 26 Aug 2023 02:47:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail02.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.67.153]) by dggsgout12.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4RXsRt4hQQz4f3jYF; Sat, 26 Aug 2023 17:47:22 +0800 (CST) Received: from huaweicloud.com (unknown [10.175.124.27]) by APP1 (Coremail) with SMTP id cCh0CgDH9DAryulkN08gBg--.20254S10; Sat, 26 Aug 2023 17:47:25 +0800 (CST) From: Kemeng Shi To: tytso@mit.edu, adilger.kernel@dilger.ca, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH v3 08/13] ext4: calculate free_clusters_count in cluster unit in verify_group_input Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2023 01:47:07 +0800 Message-Id: <20230826174712.4059355-9-shikemeng@huaweicloud.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.30.0 In-Reply-To: <20230826174712.4059355-1-shikemeng@huaweicloud.com> References: <20230826174712.4059355-1-shikemeng@huaweicloud.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CM-TRANSID: cCh0CgDH9DAryulkN08gBg--.20254S10 X-Coremail-Antispam: 1UD129KBjvJXoWxJrWrJFyfJF15Cr18Aw4Dtwb_yoW8JF4fpa 9xAF95KryrWryUWanxJ3yDXa1rWw4FyF15XFW8u34Sgr9rX3s3trnxtryYv3W5tan3CF9F q3WSgry7uFnrA3DanT9S1TB71UUUUU7qnTZGkaVYY2UrUUUUjbIjqfuFe4nvWSU5nxnvy2 9KBjDU0xBIdaVrnRJUUUBab4IE77IF4wAFF20E14v26rWj6s0DM7CY07I20VC2zVCF04k2 6cxKx2IYs7xG6rWj6s0DM7CIcVAFz4kK6r1j6r18M280x2IEY4vEnII2IxkI6r1a6r45M2 8IrcIa0xkI8VA2jI8067AKxVWUAVCq3wA2048vs2IY020Ec7CjxVAFwI0_Xr0E3s1l8cAv FVAK0II2c7xJM28CjxkF64kEwVA0rcxSw2x7M28EF7xvwVC0I7IYx2IY67AKxVWDJVCq3w A2z4x0Y4vE2Ix0cI8IcVCY1x0267AKxVW8Jr0_Cr1UM28EF7xvwVC2z280aVAFwI0_GcCE 3s1l84ACjcxK6I8E87Iv6xkF7I0E14v26rxl6s0DM2AIxVAIcxkEcVAq07x20xvEncxIr2 1l5I8CrVACY4xI64kE6c02F40Ex7xfMcIj6xIIjxv20xvE14v26r106r15McIj6I8E87Iv 67AKxVWUJVW8JwAm72CE4IkC6x0Yz7v_Jr0_Gr1lF7xvr2IYc2Ij64vIr41l42xK82IYc2 Ij64vIr41l4I8I3I0E4IkC6x0Yz7v_Jr0_Gr1lx2IqxVAqx4xG67AKxVWUJVWUGwC20s02 6x8GjcxK67AKxVWUGVWUWwC2zVAF1VAY17CE14v26r126r1DMIIYrxkI7VAKI48JMIIF0x vE2Ix0cI8IcVAFwI0_Xr0_Ar1lIxAIcVC0I7IYx2IY6xkF7I0E14v26F4j6r4UJwCI42IY 6xAIw20EY4v20xvaj40_Jr0_JF4lIxAIcVC2z280aVAFwI0_Gr0_Cr1lIxAIcVC2z280aV CY1x0267AKxVW8Jr0_Cr1UYxBIdaVFxhVjvjDU0xZFpf9x07jcjjkUUUUU= X-CM-SenderInfo: 5vklyvpphqwq5kxd4v5lfo033gof0z/ X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DATE_IN_FUTURE_06_12, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org The field free_cluster_count in struct ext4_new_group_data should be in units of clusters. In verify_group_input() this field is being filled in units of blocks. Fortunately, we don't support online resizing of bigalloc file systems, and for non-bigalloc file systems, the cluster size == block size. But fix this in case we do support online resizing of bigalloc file systems in the future. Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi Reviewed-by: Theodore Ts'o --- fs/ext4/resize.c | 5 +++-- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/ext4/resize.c b/fs/ext4/resize.c index a370ca1a2bd6..3ad2b1a900ad 100644 --- a/fs/ext4/resize.c +++ b/fs/ext4/resize.c @@ -154,8 +154,9 @@ static int verify_group_input(struct super_block *sb, overhead = ext4_group_overhead_blocks(sb, group); metaend = start + overhead; - input->free_clusters_count = free_blocks_count = - input->blocks_count - 2 - overhead - sbi->s_itb_per_group; + free_blocks_count = input->blocks_count - 2 - overhead - + sbi->s_itb_per_group; + input->free_clusters_count = EXT4_B2C(sbi, free_blocks_count); if (test_opt(sb, DEBUG)) printk(KERN_DEBUG "EXT4-fs: adding %s group %u: %u blocks "