From patchwork Sat Jun 3 15:03:18 2023 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Kemeng Shi X-Patchwork-Id: 1789941 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@legolas.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: legolas.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=ozlabs.org (client-ip=2404:9400:2221:ea00::3; helo=gandalf.ozlabs.org; envelope-from=srs0=iuqm=bx=vger.kernel.org=linux-ext4-owner@ozlabs.org; receiver=) Received: from gandalf.ozlabs.org (mail.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2404:9400:2221:ea00::3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-384)) (No client certificate requested) by legolas.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4QY9mQ2gYyz20Q4 for ; Sat, 3 Jun 2023 17:02:30 +1000 (AEST) Received: from gandalf.ozlabs.org (mail.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2404:9400:2221:ea00::3]) by gandalf.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4QY9mQ2Fd1z4xD5 for ; Sat, 3 Jun 2023 17:02:30 +1000 (AEST) Received: by gandalf.ozlabs.org (Postfix) id 4QY9mQ2BmMz4xDH; Sat, 3 Jun 2023 17:02:30 +1000 (AEST) Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: gandalf.ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=huaweicloud.com Authentication-Results: gandalf.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=vger.kernel.org (client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; helo=out1.vger.email; envelope-from=linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org; receiver=) Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email [IPv6:2620:137:e000::1:20]) by gandalf.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4QY9mQ25Qwz4xD5 for ; Sat, 3 Jun 2023 17:02:30 +1000 (AEST) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233946AbjFCHC3 (ORCPT ); Sat, 3 Jun 2023 03:02:29 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:42344 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232454AbjFCHCM (ORCPT ); Sat, 3 Jun 2023 03:02:12 -0400 Received: from dggsgout12.his.huawei.com (dggsgout12.his.huawei.com [45.249.212.56]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 15FE6C0; Sat, 3 Jun 2023 00:02:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail02.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.67.153]) by dggsgout12.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4QY9lt1Ffyz4f3nqM; Sat, 3 Jun 2023 15:02:02 +0800 (CST) Received: from huaweicloud.com (unknown [10.175.124.27]) by APP4 (Coremail) with SMTP id gCh0CgCHOKxk5Xpk+MxPKw--.30174S12; Sat, 03 Jun 2023 15:02:03 +0800 (CST) From: Kemeng Shi To: tytso@mit.edu, adilger.kernel@dilger.ca, ojaswin@linux.ibm.com Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, shikemeng@huaweicloud.com Subject: [PATCH v4 10/19] ext4: fix wrong unit use in ext4_mb_clear_bb Date: Sat, 3 Jun 2023 23:03:18 +0800 Message-Id: <20230603150327.3596033-11-shikemeng@huaweicloud.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.30.0 In-Reply-To: <20230603150327.3596033-1-shikemeng@huaweicloud.com> References: <20230603150327.3596033-1-shikemeng@huaweicloud.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CM-TRANSID: gCh0CgCHOKxk5Xpk+MxPKw--.30174S12 X-Coremail-Antispam: 1UD129KBjvdXoW7Wr18Gr18XF4xCFWUXrW7twb_yoWfAFc_K3 WkAr1kGryrJwn3CFn3tw45tr98KF40yF1DXF1fKF4xW3W5XFWxu34DJrW5Arn7WF43t343 CF1fZryfAFWS9jkaLaAFLSUrUUUUUb8apTn2vfkv8UJUUUU8Yxn0WfASr-VFAUDa7-sFnT 9fnUUIcSsGvfJTRUUUbDAFF20E14v26rWj6s0DM7CY07I20VC2zVCF04k26cxKx2IYs7xG 6rWj6s0DM7CIcVAFz4kK6r1j6r18M280x2IEY4vEnII2IxkI6r1a6r45M28IrcIa0xkI8V A2jI8067AKxVWUAVCq3wA2048vs2IY020Ec7CjxVAFwI0_Xr0E3s1l8cAvFVAK0II2c7xJ M28CjxkF64kEwVA0rcxSw2x7M28EF7xvwVC0I7IYx2IY67AKxVW7JVWDJwA2z4x0Y4vE2I x0cI8IcVCY1x0267AKxVW8Jr0_Cr1UM28EF7xvwVC2z280aVAFwI0_GcCE3s1l84ACjcxK 6I8E87Iv6xkF7I0E14v26rxl6s0DM2AIxVAIcxkEcVAq07x20xvEncxIr21l5I8CrVACY4 xI64kE6c02F40Ex7xfMcIj6xIIjxv20xvE14v26r1j6r18McIj6I8E87Iv67AKxVWUJVW8 JwAm72CE4IkC6x0Yz7v_Jr0_Gr1lF7xvr2IYc2Ij64vIr41lF7I21c0EjII2zVCS5cI20V AGYxC7MxAIw28IcxkI7VAKI48JMxC20s026xCaFVCjc4AY6r1j6r4UMI8I3I0E5I8CrVAF wI0_Jr0_Jr4lx2IqxVCjr7xvwVAFwI0_JrI_JrWlx4CE17CEb7AF67AKxVWUAVWUtwCIc4 0Y0x0EwIxGrwCI42IY6xIIjxv20xvE14v26r4j6ryUMIIF0xvE2Ix0cI8IcVCY1x0267AK xVWxJVW8Jr1lIxAIcVCF04k26cxKx2IYs7xG6r1j6r1xMIIF0xvEx4A2jsIE14v26r4j6F 4UMIIF0xvEx4A2jsIEc7CjxVAFwI0_Gr0_Gr1UYxBIdaVFxhVjvjDU0xZFpf9x0pRvJPtU UUUU= X-CM-SenderInfo: 5vklyvpphqwq5kxd4v5lfo033gof0z/ X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DATE_IN_FUTURE_06_12, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org Function ext4_issue_discard need count in cluster. Pass count_clusters instead of count to fix the mismatch. Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi Reviewed-by: Ojaswin Mujoo --- fs/ext4/mballoc.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c index 1345c4e84cc3..474aebfdc1dd 100644 --- a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c +++ b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c @@ -6280,8 +6280,8 @@ static void ext4_mb_clear_bb(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode, * them with group lock_held */ if (test_opt(sb, DISCARD)) { - err = ext4_issue_discard(sb, block_group, bit, count, - NULL); + err = ext4_issue_discard(sb, block_group, bit, + count_clusters, NULL); if (err && err != -EOPNOTSUPP) ext4_msg(sb, KERN_WARNING, "discard request in" " group:%u block:%d count:%lu failed"