Message ID | 20220322012419.725457-1-yebin10@huawei.com |
---|---|
State | Awaiting Upstream |
Headers | show |
Series | [-next] ext4: fix bug_on in start_this_handle during umount filesystem | expand |
On 22/03/22 09:24AM, Ye Bin wrote: > We got issue as follows: > ------------[ cut here ]------------ > kernel BUG at fs/jbd2/transaction.c:389! > invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN PTI > CPU: 9 PID: 131 Comm: kworker/9:1 Not tainted 5.17.0-862.14.0.6.x86_64-00001-g23f87daf7d74-dirty #197 > Workqueue: events flush_stashed_error_work > RIP: 0010:start_this_handle+0x41c/0x1160 > RSP: 0018:ffff888106b47c20 EFLAGS: 00010202 > RAX: ffffed10251b8400 RBX: ffff888128dc204c RCX: ffffffffb52972ac > RDX: 0000000000000200 RSI: 0000000000000004 RDI: ffff888128dc2050 > RBP: 0000000000000039 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: ffffed10251b840a > R10: ffff888128dc204f R11: ffffed10251b8409 R12: ffff888116d78000 > R13: 0000000000000000 R14: dffffc0000000000 R15: ffff888128dc2000 > FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88839d680000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 > CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 > CR2: 0000000001620068 CR3: 0000000376c0e000 CR4: 00000000000006e0 > DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 > DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 > Call Trace: > <TASK> > jbd2__journal_start+0x38a/0x790 > jbd2_journal_start+0x19/0x20 > flush_stashed_error_work+0x110/0x2b3 > process_one_work+0x688/0x1080 > worker_thread+0x8b/0xc50 > kthread+0x26f/0x310 > ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30 > </TASK> > Modules linked in: > ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]--- > > Above issue may happen as follows: > umount read procfs error_work > ext4_put_super > flush_work(&sbi->s_error_work); > > ext4_mb_seq_groups_show > ext4_mb_load_buddy_gfp > ext4_mb_init_group > ext4_mb_init_cache > ext4_read_block_bitmap_nowait > ext4_validate_block_bitmap > ext4_error ^^^^^^^ I am guessing this occurred due to some error injection framework? or was it a bad disk? > ext4_handle_error > schedule_work(&EXT4_SB(sb)->s_error_work); > > ext4_unregister_sysfs(sb); > jbd2_journal_destroy(sbi->s_journal); > journal_kill_thread > journal->j_flags |= JBD2_UNMOUNT; > > flush_stashed_error_work > jbd2_journal_start > start_this_handle > BUG_ON(journal->j_flags & JBD2_UNMOUNT); > > To solve this issue, we call 'ext4_unregister_sysfs' in 'ext4_put_super' firstly > like 'ext4_fill_super' error handle. I don't see a reason why not. In fact to simulate this more reliably and to add a fstest around this - we could do following. (If we are adding a fstest we might also explore checking other exported sysfs options racing with umount/mount or module load/unload). Like in past it was journal_task at [1] Thread-1 Thread-2 while [ 1 ]: while [ 1 ]: echo 1 > /sys/fs/ext4/<dev>/trigger_fs_error umount /dev/<dev> sleep random sleep random mount /dev/<dev> /mnt Currently we call flush_work(&sbi->s_error_work) and then ext4_unregister_sysfs(). So if someone triggered an fs error before unregistering from sysfs, it will schedule_work() which might race similar to jbd2_journal_destroy() like what you showed above. So calling ext4_unregister_sysfs() as the first thing in ext4_put_super(), looks good to me. Reviewed-by: Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@linux.ibm.com> [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20200318061301.4320-1-riteshh@linux.ibm.com/ > > Signed-off-by: Ye Bin <yebin10@huawei.com> > --- > fs/ext4/super.c | 19 ++++++++++++------- > 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/fs/ext4/super.c b/fs/ext4/super.c > index 81749eaddf4c..a673012e35c8 100644 > --- a/fs/ext4/super.c > +++ b/fs/ext4/super.c > @@ -1199,20 +1199,25 @@ static void ext4_put_super(struct super_block *sb) > int aborted = 0; > int i, err; > > - ext4_unregister_li_request(sb); > - ext4_quota_off_umount(sb); > - > - flush_work(&sbi->s_error_work); > - destroy_workqueue(sbi->rsv_conversion_wq); > - ext4_release_orphan_info(sb); > - > /* > * Unregister sysfs before destroying jbd2 journal. > * Since we could still access attr_journal_task attribute via sysfs > * path which could have sbi->s_journal->j_task as NULL > + * Unregister sysfs before flush sbi->s_error_work. > + * Since user may read /proc/fs/ext4/xx/mb_groups during umount, If > + * read metadata verify failed then will queue error work. > + * flush_stashed_error_work will call start_this_handle may trigger > + * BUG_ON. > */ > ext4_unregister_sysfs(sb); > > + ext4_unregister_li_request(sb); > + ext4_quota_off_umount(sb); > + > + flush_work(&sbi->s_error_work); > + destroy_workqueue(sbi->rsv_conversion_wq); > + ext4_release_orphan_info(sb); > + > if (sbi->s_journal) { > aborted = is_journal_aborted(sbi->s_journal); > err = jbd2_journal_destroy(sbi->s_journal); > -- > 2.31.1 >
On Tue 22-03-22 09:24:19, Ye Bin wrote: > We got issue as follows: > ------------[ cut here ]------------ > kernel BUG at fs/jbd2/transaction.c:389! > invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN PTI > CPU: 9 PID: 131 Comm: kworker/9:1 Not tainted 5.17.0-862.14.0.6.x86_64-00001-g23f87daf7d74-dirty #197 > Workqueue: events flush_stashed_error_work > RIP: 0010:start_this_handle+0x41c/0x1160 > RSP: 0018:ffff888106b47c20 EFLAGS: 00010202 > RAX: ffffed10251b8400 RBX: ffff888128dc204c RCX: ffffffffb52972ac > RDX: 0000000000000200 RSI: 0000000000000004 RDI: ffff888128dc2050 > RBP: 0000000000000039 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: ffffed10251b840a > R10: ffff888128dc204f R11: ffffed10251b8409 R12: ffff888116d78000 > R13: 0000000000000000 R14: dffffc0000000000 R15: ffff888128dc2000 > FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88839d680000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 > CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 > CR2: 0000000001620068 CR3: 0000000376c0e000 CR4: 00000000000006e0 > DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 > DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 > Call Trace: > <TASK> > jbd2__journal_start+0x38a/0x790 > jbd2_journal_start+0x19/0x20 > flush_stashed_error_work+0x110/0x2b3 > process_one_work+0x688/0x1080 > worker_thread+0x8b/0xc50 > kthread+0x26f/0x310 > ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30 > </TASK> > Modules linked in: > ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]--- > > Above issue may happen as follows: > umount read procfs error_work > ext4_put_super > flush_work(&sbi->s_error_work); > > ext4_mb_seq_groups_show > ext4_mb_load_buddy_gfp > ext4_mb_init_group > ext4_mb_init_cache > ext4_read_block_bitmap_nowait > ext4_validate_block_bitmap > ext4_error > ext4_handle_error > schedule_work(&EXT4_SB(sb)->s_error_work); > > ext4_unregister_sysfs(sb); > jbd2_journal_destroy(sbi->s_journal); > journal_kill_thread > journal->j_flags |= JBD2_UNMOUNT; > > flush_stashed_error_work > jbd2_journal_start > start_this_handle > BUG_ON(journal->j_flags & JBD2_UNMOUNT); > > To solve this issue, we call 'ext4_unregister_sysfs' in 'ext4_put_super' firstly > like 'ext4_fill_super' error handle. > > Signed-off-by: Ye Bin <yebin10@huawei.com> Looks good. Thanks! Feel free to add: Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Honza > --- > fs/ext4/super.c | 19 ++++++++++++------- > 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/fs/ext4/super.c b/fs/ext4/super.c > index 81749eaddf4c..a673012e35c8 100644 > --- a/fs/ext4/super.c > +++ b/fs/ext4/super.c > @@ -1199,20 +1199,25 @@ static void ext4_put_super(struct super_block *sb) > int aborted = 0; > int i, err; > > - ext4_unregister_li_request(sb); > - ext4_quota_off_umount(sb); > - > - flush_work(&sbi->s_error_work); > - destroy_workqueue(sbi->rsv_conversion_wq); > - ext4_release_orphan_info(sb); > - > /* > * Unregister sysfs before destroying jbd2 journal. > * Since we could still access attr_journal_task attribute via sysfs > * path which could have sbi->s_journal->j_task as NULL > + * Unregister sysfs before flush sbi->s_error_work. > + * Since user may read /proc/fs/ext4/xx/mb_groups during umount, If > + * read metadata verify failed then will queue error work. > + * flush_stashed_error_work will call start_this_handle may trigger > + * BUG_ON. > */ > ext4_unregister_sysfs(sb); > > + ext4_unregister_li_request(sb); > + ext4_quota_off_umount(sb); > + > + flush_work(&sbi->s_error_work); > + destroy_workqueue(sbi->rsv_conversion_wq); > + ext4_release_orphan_info(sb); > + > if (sbi->s_journal) { > aborted = is_journal_aborted(sbi->s_journal); > err = jbd2_journal_destroy(sbi->s_journal); > -- > 2.31.1 >
On Tue, 22 Mar 2022 09:24:19 +0800, Ye Bin wrote: > We got issue as follows: > ------------[ cut here ]------------ > kernel BUG at fs/jbd2/transaction.c:389! > invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN PTI > CPU: 9 PID: 131 Comm: kworker/9:1 Not tainted 5.17.0-862.14.0.6.x86_64-00001-g23f87daf7d74-dirty #197 > Workqueue: events flush_stashed_error_work > RIP: 0010:start_this_handle+0x41c/0x1160 > RSP: 0018:ffff888106b47c20 EFLAGS: 00010202 > RAX: ffffed10251b8400 RBX: ffff888128dc204c RCX: ffffffffb52972ac > RDX: 0000000000000200 RSI: 0000000000000004 RDI: ffff888128dc2050 > RBP: 0000000000000039 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: ffffed10251b840a > R10: ffff888128dc204f R11: ffffed10251b8409 R12: ffff888116d78000 > R13: 0000000000000000 R14: dffffc0000000000 R15: ffff888128dc2000 > FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88839d680000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 > CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 > CR2: 0000000001620068 CR3: 0000000376c0e000 CR4: 00000000000006e0 > DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 > DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 > Call Trace: > <TASK> > jbd2__journal_start+0x38a/0x790 > jbd2_journal_start+0x19/0x20 > flush_stashed_error_work+0x110/0x2b3 > process_one_work+0x688/0x1080 > worker_thread+0x8b/0xc50 > kthread+0x26f/0x310 > ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30 > </TASK> > Modules linked in: > ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]--- > > [...] Applied, thanks! [1/1] ext4: fix bug_on in start_this_handle during umount filesystem commit: 20164749617e56d584313ad775d6dd3b7da40dc1 Best regards,
diff --git a/fs/ext4/super.c b/fs/ext4/super.c index 81749eaddf4c..a673012e35c8 100644 --- a/fs/ext4/super.c +++ b/fs/ext4/super.c @@ -1199,20 +1199,25 @@ static void ext4_put_super(struct super_block *sb) int aborted = 0; int i, err; - ext4_unregister_li_request(sb); - ext4_quota_off_umount(sb); - - flush_work(&sbi->s_error_work); - destroy_workqueue(sbi->rsv_conversion_wq); - ext4_release_orphan_info(sb); - /* * Unregister sysfs before destroying jbd2 journal. * Since we could still access attr_journal_task attribute via sysfs * path which could have sbi->s_journal->j_task as NULL + * Unregister sysfs before flush sbi->s_error_work. + * Since user may read /proc/fs/ext4/xx/mb_groups during umount, If + * read metadata verify failed then will queue error work. + * flush_stashed_error_work will call start_this_handle may trigger + * BUG_ON. */ ext4_unregister_sysfs(sb); + ext4_unregister_li_request(sb); + ext4_quota_off_umount(sb); + + flush_work(&sbi->s_error_work); + destroy_workqueue(sbi->rsv_conversion_wq); + ext4_release_orphan_info(sb); + if (sbi->s_journal) { aborted = is_journal_aborted(sbi->s_journal); err = jbd2_journal_destroy(sbi->s_journal);
We got issue as follows: ------------[ cut here ]------------ kernel BUG at fs/jbd2/transaction.c:389! invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN PTI CPU: 9 PID: 131 Comm: kworker/9:1 Not tainted 5.17.0-862.14.0.6.x86_64-00001-g23f87daf7d74-dirty #197 Workqueue: events flush_stashed_error_work RIP: 0010:start_this_handle+0x41c/0x1160 RSP: 0018:ffff888106b47c20 EFLAGS: 00010202 RAX: ffffed10251b8400 RBX: ffff888128dc204c RCX: ffffffffb52972ac RDX: 0000000000000200 RSI: 0000000000000004 RDI: ffff888128dc2050 RBP: 0000000000000039 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: ffffed10251b840a R10: ffff888128dc204f R11: ffffed10251b8409 R12: ffff888116d78000 R13: 0000000000000000 R14: dffffc0000000000 R15: ffff888128dc2000 FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88839d680000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 0000000001620068 CR3: 0000000376c0e000 CR4: 00000000000006e0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 Call Trace: <TASK> jbd2__journal_start+0x38a/0x790 jbd2_journal_start+0x19/0x20 flush_stashed_error_work+0x110/0x2b3 process_one_work+0x688/0x1080 worker_thread+0x8b/0xc50 kthread+0x26f/0x310 ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30 </TASK> Modules linked in: ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]--- Above issue may happen as follows: umount read procfs error_work ext4_put_super flush_work(&sbi->s_error_work); ext4_mb_seq_groups_show ext4_mb_load_buddy_gfp ext4_mb_init_group ext4_mb_init_cache ext4_read_block_bitmap_nowait ext4_validate_block_bitmap ext4_error ext4_handle_error schedule_work(&EXT4_SB(sb)->s_error_work); ext4_unregister_sysfs(sb); jbd2_journal_destroy(sbi->s_journal); journal_kill_thread journal->j_flags |= JBD2_UNMOUNT; flush_stashed_error_work jbd2_journal_start start_this_handle BUG_ON(journal->j_flags & JBD2_UNMOUNT); To solve this issue, we call 'ext4_unregister_sysfs' in 'ext4_put_super' firstly like 'ext4_fill_super' error handle. Signed-off-by: Ye Bin <yebin10@huawei.com> --- fs/ext4/super.c | 19 ++++++++++++------- 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)