ext4: remove redundant check buffer_uptodate()

Now set_buffer_uptodate() will test first and then set, so we don't have
to check buffer_uptodate() first, remove it to simplify code.

Signed-off-by: Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com>
---
 fs/ext4/inode.c | 9 +++------
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

On 21/04/26 11:23AM, Joseph Qi wrote:
> Now set_buffer_uptodate() will test first and then set, so we don't have
> to check buffer_uptodate() first, remove it to simplify code.

Maybe we can change below function as well then.
No need to check same thing twice since set_buffer_uptodate() is already doing
the check.
diff --git a/fs/ext4/ext4.h b/fs/ext4/ext4.h
index b258e8279266..856bd9981409 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/ext4.h
+++ b/fs/ext4/ext4.h
@@ -3749,7 +3749,7 @@ static inline int ext4_buffer_uptodate(struct buffer_head *bh)
         * have to read the block because we may read the old data
         * successfully.
         */
-       if (!buffer_uptodate(bh) && buffer_write_io_error(bh))
+       if (buffer_write_io_error(bh))
                set_buffer_uptodate(bh);
        return buffer_uptodate(bh);
 }

With that pls feel free to add:
Reviewed-by: Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@linux.ibm.com>

>
> Signed-off-by: Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com>
> ---
>  fs/ext4/inode.c | 9 +++------
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/inode.c b/fs/ext4/inode.c
> index 0948a43..9e02538 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/inode.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/inode.c
> @@ -1065,10 +1065,8 @@ static int ext4_block_write_begin(struct page *page, loff_t pos, unsigned len,
>  	    block++, block_start = block_end, bh = bh->b_this_page) {
>  		block_end = block_start + blocksize;
>  		if (block_end <= from || block_start >= to) {
> -			if (PageUptodate(page)) {
> -				if (!buffer_uptodate(bh))
> -					set_buffer_uptodate(bh);
> -			}
> +			if (PageUptodate(page))
> +				set_buffer_uptodate(bh);
>  			continue;
>  		}
>  		if (buffer_new(bh))
> @@ -1092,8 +1090,7 @@ static int ext4_block_write_begin(struct page *page, loff_t pos, unsigned len,
>  			}
>  		}
>  		if (PageUptodate(page)) {
> -			if (!buffer_uptodate(bh))
> -				set_buffer_uptodate(bh);
> +			set_buffer_uptodate(bh);
>  			continue;
>  		}
>  		if (!buffer_uptodate(bh) && !buffer_delay(bh) &&
> --
> 1.8.3.1
>

On 4/26/21 1:05 PM, riteshh wrote:
> On 21/04/26 11:23AM, Joseph Qi wrote:
>> Now set_buffer_uptodate() will test first and then set, so we don't have
>> to check buffer_uptodate() first, remove it to simplify code.
> 
> Maybe we can change below function as well then.
> No need to check same thing twice since set_buffer_uptodate() is already doing
> the check.
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/ext4.h b/fs/ext4/ext4.h
> index b258e8279266..856bd9981409 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/ext4.h
> +++ b/fs/ext4/ext4.h
> @@ -3749,7 +3749,7 @@ static inline int ext4_buffer_uptodate(struct buffer_head *bh)
>          * have to read the block because we may read the old data
>          * successfully.
>          */
> -       if (!buffer_uptodate(bh) && buffer_write_io_error(bh))
> +       if (buffer_write_io_error(bh))
>                 set_buffer_uptodate(bh);
>         return buffer_uptodate(bh);
>  }
> 
> With that pls feel free to add:
> Reviewed-by: Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@linux.ibm.com>
> 

Sure, will send v2 with above addressed.

Thanks,
Joseph