@@ -2557,19 +2557,45 @@ int ext4_mb_release(struct super_block *sb)
return 0;
}
-static inline void ext4_issue_discard(struct super_block *sb,
- ext4_group_t block_group, ext4_grpblk_t block, int count)
+static void ext4_discard_blocks(struct super_block *sb,
+ ext4_group_t block_group, ext4_grpblk_t block,
+ sector_t count, int sec_del)
{
- int ret;
+ int ret = 0;
ext4_fsblk_t discard_block;
discard_block = block + ext4_group_first_block_no(sb, block_group);
- trace_ext4_discard_blocks(sb,
- (unsigned long long) discard_block, count);
- ret = sb_issue_discard(sb, discard_block, count);
- if (ret == EOPNOTSUPP) {
- ext4_warning(sb, "discard not supported, disabling");
- clear_opt(EXT4_SB(sb)->s_mount_opt, DISCARD);
+ discard_block <<= (sb->s_blocksize_bits - 9);
+ count <<= (sb->s_blocksize_bits - 9);
+
+ if (sec_del) {
+ int zd = queue_discard_zeroes_data(bdev_get_queue(sb->s_bdev));
+ /*
+ Ok, this is security deletion request. If device has zero
+ data on discard feature then simple discard request is
+ sufficient.
+ */
+ if (test_opt(sb, DISCARD) && zd) {
+ goto issue_discard;
+ } else {
+ /* Explicitly zeroout is necessery */
+ ret = blkdev_issue_zeroout(sb->s_bdev, discard_block,
+ count, GFP_NOIO, BLKDEV_IFL_WAIT);
+ if (ret)
+ ext4_std_error(sb, ret);
+ }
+ }
+issue_discard:
+ if (test_opt(sb, DISCARD)) {
+ trace_ext4_discard_blocks(sb,
+ (unsigned long long) discard_block, count);
+ ret = blkdev_issue_discard(sb->s_bdev, discard_block,
+ count, GFP_NOIO,
+ BLKDEV_IFL_WAIT | BLKDEV_IFL_BARRIER);
+ if (ret == EOPNOTSUPP) {
+ ext4_warning(sb, "discard not supported, disabling");
+ clear_opt(EXT4_SB(sb)->s_mount_opt, DISCARD);
+ }
}
}
@@ -2592,9 +2618,8 @@ static void release_blocks_on_commit(journal_t *journal, transaction_t *txn)
mb_debug(1, "gonna free %u blocks in group %u (0x%p):",
entry->count, entry->group, entry);
- if (test_opt(sb, DISCARD))
- ext4_issue_discard(sb, entry->group,
- entry->start_blk, entry->count);
+ ext4_discard_blocks(sb, entry->group,
+ entry->start_blk, entry->count, entry->secdel);
err = ext4_mb_load_buddy(sb, entry->group, &e4b);
/* we expect to find existing buddy because it's pinned */
@@ -4628,7 +4653,8 @@ do_more:
new_entry->group = block_group;
new_entry->count = count;
new_entry->t_tid = handle->h_transaction->t_tid;
-
+ new_entry->secdel = !!ext4_test_inode_flag(inode,
+ EXT4_INODE_SECRM);
ext4_lock_group(sb, block_group);
mb_clear_bits(bitmap_bh->b_data, bit, count);
ext4_mb_free_metadata(handle, &e4b, new_entry);
@@ -4641,8 +4667,8 @@ do_more:
mb_clear_bits(bitmap_bh->b_data, bit, count);
mb_free_blocks(inode, &e4b, bit, count);
ext4_mb_return_to_preallocation(inode, &e4b, block, count);
- if (test_opt(sb, DISCARD))
- ext4_issue_discard(sb, block_group, bit, count);
+ ext4_discard_blocks(sb, block_group, bit, count,
+ ext4_test_inode_flag(inode,EXT4_INODE_SECRM));
}
ret = ext4_free_blks_count(sb, gdp) + count;
@@ -111,6 +111,8 @@ struct ext4_free_data {
/* transaction which freed this extent */
tid_t t_tid;
+
+ unsigned secdel:1; /* Secure deletion */
};
struct ext4_prealloc_space {
Some people do care about stale data. Most obvious way is to explicitly zeroout data on freeing. But if underling device has discard support with zeroing we may avoid unnecessary io. Off course that feature comes with the cost, but only if user actually use it by setting SECRM flag on inode (which is not the case by default). Signed-off-by: Dmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@openvz.org> --- fs/ext4/mballoc.c | 56 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------- fs/ext4/mballoc.h | 2 + 2 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)