From patchwork Wed Feb 16 13:13:17 2022 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Arnd Bergmann X-Patchwork-Id: 1593670 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@bilbo.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: bilbo.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; secure) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=bombadil.20210309 header.b=0jNXsWW/; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20201202 header.b=C3unWCwA; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; spf=none (no SPF record) smtp.mailfrom=lists.infradead.org (client-ip=2607:7c80:54:e::133; helo=bombadil.infradead.org; envelope-from=linux-snps-arc-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.infradead.org; receiver=) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [IPv6:2607:7c80:54:e::133]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by bilbo.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4JzJPg2lwQz9sFv for ; Thu, 17 Feb 2022 00:16:23 +1100 (AEDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To: Message-Id:Date:Subject:Cc:To:From:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=6zRCH1Sj6HfxRzUjXSQ+MsioOn31qH0yLZuho1s6RFw=; b=0jNXsWW/I8iCJF 9l1TwY8tDIe24uCgmhvQv7aTZkLpDGjgtPbKTmAXgcoKI160qkn9uY0jlANWPtsnoSKHfplQe/cnL fYhvelr1KxDFuGiiBQi+YLt6ZrNk7+hX11OTuZTyjkDhOiSDhbMlylK6z/izwMJ+5G+qyORWZTyeb QQNyYscgotZZB4BXpCHh4602/2m4gSGAXG/fNxxZZ27GHc9xKFKB2qorZVPRTD4j5nNZ2CndzYCWL tUSoXYzqCPh65YJCPachc8G91YEXCxm4l4i1ogJbHBqd8gqGDqMCyMjqV/oDmHzKg8rG3pGU1UhuI XmUioaKtqW5AhA3CnZdQ==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1nKKAN-00757Q-V0; Wed, 16 Feb 2022 13:16:19 +0000 Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org ([139.178.84.217]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1nKKAI-00752C-7r; Wed, 16 Feb 2022 13:16:15 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C4F4A61690; Wed, 16 Feb 2022 13:16:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D2D7CC004E1; Wed, 16 Feb 2022 13:16:03 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1645017373; bh=FUHsy4SbKAUYNozm8BPMqbHwV1/3+i881CYSdrE+f4c=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=C3unWCwA5MgDv8fBfemfvwfjvGBTJZsKYlZzOMmGSxWCOv3egbiFfgvi6CZWYIz62 SqGuR0wjzV94ZlsbXH8YShBv61bKTXHsmJKwfNnJSi4HJBQAdVsCYFbFQbcaYjWab/ jAEKucXwBpQtGdC077SOUTz4KZTjRYlCivfC6ZNebr6LssQEH2Z1PZ8sjKbXXO+4xO V7228/v7+85km2+/m1Pe7WU22HBCYxgzfS1ftOJ3VFgXEwTnGmqW4VM9xWj2N15Prw 9+iRP8Nmriy3u7jzXRk+4VwmX64BlsD4oODBGwxfjJOtD+0J43y9gbdz9dd+byQFJ4 25FHN4etW4bpg== From: Arnd Bergmann To: Linus Torvalds , Christoph Hellwig , linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org, arnd@arndb.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk Cc: linux@armlinux.org.uk, will@kernel.org, guoren@kernel.org, bcain@codeaurora.org, geert@linux-m68k.org, monstr@monstr.eu, tsbogend@alpha.franken.de, nickhu@andestech.com, green.hu@gmail.com, dinguyen@kernel.org, shorne@gmail.com, deller@gmx.de, mpe@ellerman.id.au, peterz@infradead.org, mingo@redhat.com, mark.rutland@arm.com, hca@linux.ibm.com, dalias@libc.org, davem@davemloft.net, richard@nod.at, x86@kernel.org, jcmvbkbc@gmail.com, ebiederm@xmission.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, ardb@kernel.org, linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org, linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org, linux-csky@vger.kernel.org, linux-hexagon@vger.kernel.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, openrisc@lists.librecores.org, linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, linux-um@lists.infradead.org, linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org, stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH v2 03/18] nds32: fix access_ok() checks in get/put_user Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2022 14:13:17 +0100 Message-Id: <20220216131332.1489939-4-arnd@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.29.2 In-Reply-To: <20220216131332.1489939-1-arnd@kernel.org> References: <20220216131332.1489939-1-arnd@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20220216_051614_386508_AEA8BD94 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 13.19 ) X-Spam-Score: -5.4 (-----) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "bombadil.infradead.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: From: Arnd Bergmann The get_user()/put_user() functions are meant to check for access_ok(), while the __get_user()/__put_user() functions don't. This broke in 4.19 for nds32, when it gained an extraneous check in __get_user(), but lost the check it needs in __put_user(). Content analysis details: (-5.4 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -5.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, high trust [139.178.84.217 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID_EF Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain -0.2 DKIMWL_WL_HIGH DKIMwl.org - High trust sender X-BeenThere: linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on Synopsys ARC Processors List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-snps-arc" Errors-To: linux-snps-arc-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.infradead.org From: Arnd Bergmann The get_user()/put_user() functions are meant to check for access_ok(), while the __get_user()/__put_user() functions don't. This broke in 4.19 for nds32, when it gained an extraneous check in __get_user(), but lost the check it needs in __put_user(). Fixes: 487913ab18c2 ("nds32: Extract the checking and getting pointer to a macro") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org @ v4.19+ Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig --- arch/nds32/include/asm/uaccess.h | 22 +++++++++++++++++----- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/nds32/include/asm/uaccess.h b/arch/nds32/include/asm/uaccess.h index d4cbf069dc22..37a40981deb3 100644 --- a/arch/nds32/include/asm/uaccess.h +++ b/arch/nds32/include/asm/uaccess.h @@ -70,9 +70,7 @@ static inline void set_fs(mm_segment_t fs) * versions are void (ie, don't return a value as such). */ -#define get_user __get_user \ - -#define __get_user(x, ptr) \ +#define get_user(x, ptr) \ ({ \ long __gu_err = 0; \ __get_user_check((x), (ptr), __gu_err); \ @@ -85,6 +83,14 @@ static inline void set_fs(mm_segment_t fs) (void)0; \ }) +#define __get_user(x, ptr) \ +({ \ + long __gu_err = 0; \ + const __typeof__(*(ptr)) __user *__p = (ptr); \ + __get_user_err((x), __p, (__gu_err)); \ + __gu_err; \ +}) + #define __get_user_check(x, ptr, err) \ ({ \ const __typeof__(*(ptr)) __user *__p = (ptr); \ @@ -165,12 +171,18 @@ do { \ : "r"(addr), "i"(-EFAULT) \ : "cc") -#define put_user __put_user \ +#define put_user(x, ptr) \ +({ \ + long __pu_err = 0; \ + __put_user_check((x), (ptr), __pu_err); \ + __pu_err; \ +}) #define __put_user(x, ptr) \ ({ \ long __pu_err = 0; \ - __put_user_err((x), (ptr), __pu_err); \ + __typeof__(*(ptr)) __user *__p = (ptr); \ + __put_user_err((x), __p, __pu_err); \ __pu_err; \ })