diff mbox

atomic64: No need for CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_ATOMIC64_DEC_IF_POSITIVE

Message ID 1473352098-5822-1-git-send-email-vgupta@synopsys.com
State New
Headers show

Commit Message

Vineet Gupta Sept. 8, 2016, 4:28 p.m. UTC
This came to light when implementing native 64-bit atomics for ARCv2.

The atomic64 self-test code uses CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_ATOMIC64_DEC_IF_POSITIVE
to check whether atomic64_dec_if_positive() is available.
It seems it was needed when not every arch defined it.
However as of current code the Kconfig option seems needless

- for CONFIG_GENERIC_ATOMIC64 it is auto-enabled in lib/Kconfig and a
  generic definition of API is present lib/atomic64.c
- arches with native 64-bit atomics select it in arch/*/Kconfig and
  define the API in their headers

So I see no point in keeping the Kconfig option

Compile tested for 2 representatives:
 - blackfin (CONFIG_GENERIC_ATOMIC64)
 - x86 (!CONFIG_GENERIC_ATOMIC64)

Also logistics wise it seemed simpler to just do this in 1 patch vs.
splitting per arch - but I can break it up if maintainer feel that
is better to avoid conflicts.

Cc: Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>
Cc: Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru>
Cc: Matt Turner <mattst88@gmail.com>
Cc: Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Cc: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
Cc: "James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@parisc-linux.org>
Cc: Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@mellanox.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: x86@kernel.org
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Vineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com>
Cc: Zhaoxiu Zeng <zhaoxiu.zeng@gmail.com>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>
Cc: Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@virtuozzo.com>
Cc: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Cc: Ming Lin <ming.l@ssi.samsung.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org
Cc: linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
Cc: sparclinux@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Vineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com>
---
 arch/alpha/Kconfig   | 1 -
 arch/arm/Kconfig     | 1 -
 arch/arm64/Kconfig   | 1 -
 arch/mips/Kconfig    | 1 -
 arch/parisc/Kconfig  | 1 -
 arch/powerpc/Kconfig | 1 -
 arch/s390/Kconfig    | 1 -
 arch/sparc/Kconfig   | 1 -
 arch/tile/Kconfig    | 1 -
 arch/x86/Kconfig     | 1 -
 lib/Kconfig          | 3 ---
 lib/atomic64_test.c  | 4 ----
 12 files changed, 17 deletions(-)

Comments

Peter Zijlstra Sept. 8, 2016, 6:19 p.m. UTC | #1
On Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 09:28:18AM -0700, Vineet Gupta wrote:
> This came to light when implementing native 64-bit atomics for ARCv2.
> 
> The atomic64 self-test code uses CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_ATOMIC64_DEC_IF_POSITIVE
> to check whether atomic64_dec_if_positive() is available.
> It seems it was needed when not every arch defined it.
> However as of current code the Kconfig option seems needless
> 
> - for CONFIG_GENERIC_ATOMIC64 it is auto-enabled in lib/Kconfig and a
>   generic definition of API is present lib/atomic64.c
> - arches with native 64-bit atomics select it in arch/*/Kconfig and
>   define the API in their headers
> 
> So I see no point in keeping the Kconfig option
> 
> Compile tested for 2 representatives:
>  - blackfin (CONFIG_GENERIC_ATOMIC64)
>  - x86 (!CONFIG_GENERIC_ATOMIC64)
> 
> Also logistics wise it seemed simpler to just do this in 1 patch vs.
> splitting per arch - but I can break it up if maintainer feel that
> is better to avoid conflicts.

Works for me; you want me to take this, or do you need it for you ARCv2
patches?
Vineet Gupta Sept. 8, 2016, 6:34 p.m. UTC | #2
On 09/08/2016 11:19 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 09:28:18AM -0700, Vineet Gupta wrote:
>> This came to light when implementing native 64-bit atomics for ARCv2.
>>
>> The atomic64 self-test code uses CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_ATOMIC64_DEC_IF_POSITIVE
>> to check whether atomic64_dec_if_positive() is available.
>> It seems it was needed when not every arch defined it.
>> However as of current code the Kconfig option seems needless
>>
>> - for CONFIG_GENERIC_ATOMIC64 it is auto-enabled in lib/Kconfig and a
>>   generic definition of API is present lib/atomic64.c
>> - arches with native 64-bit atomics select it in arch/*/Kconfig and
>>   define the API in their headers
>>
>> So I see no point in keeping the Kconfig option
>>
>> Compile tested for 2 representatives:
>>  - blackfin (CONFIG_GENERIC_ATOMIC64)
>>  - x86 (!CONFIG_GENERIC_ATOMIC64)
>>
>> Also logistics wise it seemed simpler to just do this in 1 patch vs.
>> splitting per arch - but I can break it up if maintainer feel that
>> is better to avoid conflicts.
> Works for me; you want me to take this, or do you need it for you ARCv2
> patches?

Please do. ARCv2 patch (following shortly) doesn't need it - I selected the
option in orig patch - which I can just take out.

Thx,
-Vineet
kernel test robot Sept. 11, 2016, 4:31 a.m. UTC | #3
Hi Vineet,

[auto build test ERROR on arm64/for-next/core]
[cannot apply to linus/master linux/master v4.8-rc5 next-20160909]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help improve the system]
[Suggest to use git(>=2.9.0) format-patch --base=<commit> (or --base=auto for convenience) to record what (public, well-known) commit your patch series was built on]
[Check https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch for more information]

url:    https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Vineet-Gupta/atomic64-No-need-for-CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_ATOMIC64_DEC_IF_POSITIVE/20160909-013936
base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arm64/linux.git for-next/core
config: ia64-allmodconfig (attached as .config)
compiler: ia64-linux-gcc (GCC) 4.9.0
reproduce:
        wget https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/wfg/lkp-tests.git/plain/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
        chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
        # save the attached .config to linux build tree
        make.cross ARCH=ia64 

All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):

   lib/atomic64_test.c: In function 'test_atomic64':
>> lib/atomic64_test.c:217:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'atomic64_dec_if_positive' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
     BUG_ON(atomic64_dec_if_positive(&v) != (onestwos - 1));
     ^
   cc1: some warnings being treated as errors

vim +/atomic64_dec_if_positive +217 lib/atomic64_test.c

86a89380 Luca Barbieri 2010-02-24  211  	INIT(v0);
9efbcd59 Luca Barbieri 2010-03-01  212  	BUG_ON(!atomic64_add_unless(&v, one, v1));
86a89380 Luca Barbieri 2010-02-24  213  	r += one;
86a89380 Luca Barbieri 2010-02-24  214  	BUG_ON(v.counter != r);
86a89380 Luca Barbieri 2010-02-24  215  
86a89380 Luca Barbieri 2010-02-24  216  	INIT(onestwos);
86a89380 Luca Barbieri 2010-02-24 @217  	BUG_ON(atomic64_dec_if_positive(&v) != (onestwos - 1));
86a89380 Luca Barbieri 2010-02-24  218  	r -= one;
86a89380 Luca Barbieri 2010-02-24  219  	BUG_ON(v.counter != r);
86a89380 Luca Barbieri 2010-02-24  220  

:::::: The code at line 217 was first introduced by commit
:::::: 86a8938078a8bb518c5376de493e348c7490d506 lib: Add self-test for atomic64_t

:::::: TO: Luca Barbieri <luca@luca-barbieri.com>
:::::: CC: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>

---
0-DAY kernel test infrastructure                Open Source Technology Center
https://lists.01.org/pipermail/kbuild-all                   Intel Corporation
Vineet Gupta Sept. 12, 2016, 5:58 p.m. UTC | #4
Hi Peter / Tony.

Sorry for the rebase snafu with v2.

So kbuild service reported build failure of ia64 with v1 of the patch.
I've added an untested atomic64_dec_if_positive() to ia64, shamelessly
copied from s390 with some adjustments 64-bit long etc. Could you please
double check.

It builds fine with ia64 cross compiler.

Thx,
-Vineet

*** BLURB HERE ***

Vineet Gupta (2):
  ia64: implement atomic64_dec_if_positive
  atomic64: No need for CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_ATOMIC64_DEC_IF_POSITIVE

 arch/alpha/Kconfig             |  1 -
 arch/arm/Kconfig               |  1 -
 arch/arm64/Kconfig             |  1 -
 arch/ia64/include/asm/atomic.h | 16 ++++++++++++++++
 arch/mips/Kconfig              |  1 -
 arch/parisc/Kconfig            |  1 -
 arch/powerpc/Kconfig           |  1 -
 arch/s390/Kconfig              |  1 -
 arch/sparc/Kconfig             |  1 -
 arch/tile/Kconfig              |  1 -
 arch/x86/Kconfig               |  1 -
 lib/Kconfig                    |  3 ---
 lib/atomic64_test.c            |  4 ----
 13 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/arch/alpha/Kconfig b/arch/alpha/Kconfig
index 7f312d80b43b..0e49d39ea74a 100644
--- a/arch/alpha/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/alpha/Kconfig
@@ -15,7 +15,6 @@  config ALPHA
 	select GENERIC_IRQ_SHOW
 	select ARCH_WANT_IPC_PARSE_VERSION
 	select ARCH_HAVE_NMI_SAFE_CMPXCHG
-	select ARCH_HAS_ATOMIC64_DEC_IF_POSITIVE
 	select AUDIT_ARCH
 	select GENERIC_CLOCKEVENTS
 	select GENERIC_SMP_IDLE_THREAD
diff --git a/arch/arm/Kconfig b/arch/arm/Kconfig
index a9c4e48bb7ec..2a50957c7bfb 100644
--- a/arch/arm/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/arm/Kconfig
@@ -1,7 +1,6 @@ 
 config ARM
 	bool
 	default y
-	select ARCH_HAS_ATOMIC64_DEC_IF_POSITIVE
 	select ARCH_HAS_DEVMEM_IS_ALLOWED
 	select ARCH_HAS_ELF_RANDOMIZE
 	select ARCH_HAS_TICK_BROADCAST if GENERIC_CLOCKEVENTS_BROADCAST
diff --git a/arch/arm64/Kconfig b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
index bc3f00f586f1..3df2ca7efbcc 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
@@ -6,7 +6,6 @@  config ARM64
 	select ACPI_MCFG if ACPI
 	select ARCH_HAS_DEVMEM_IS_ALLOWED
 	select ARCH_HAS_ACPI_TABLE_UPGRADE if ACPI
-	select ARCH_HAS_ATOMIC64_DEC_IF_POSITIVE
 	select ARCH_HAS_ELF_RANDOMIZE
 	select ARCH_HAS_GCOV_PROFILE_ALL
 	select ARCH_HAS_KCOV
diff --git a/arch/mips/Kconfig b/arch/mips/Kconfig
index 26388562e300..5bbea197c220 100644
--- a/arch/mips/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/mips/Kconfig
@@ -30,7 +30,6 @@  config MIPS
 	select HAVE_ARCH_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE if CPU_SUPPORTS_HUGEPAGES && 64BIT
 	select RTC_LIB if !MACH_LOONGSON64
 	select GENERIC_ATOMIC64 if !64BIT
-	select ARCH_HAS_ATOMIC64_DEC_IF_POSITIVE
 	select HAVE_DMA_CONTIGUOUS
 	select HAVE_DMA_API_DEBUG
 	select GENERIC_IRQ_PROBE
diff --git a/arch/parisc/Kconfig b/arch/parisc/Kconfig
index cd8778103165..9e40b52c0721 100644
--- a/arch/parisc/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/parisc/Kconfig
@@ -15,7 +15,6 @@  config PARISC
 	select BUILDTIME_EXTABLE_SORT
 	select HAVE_PERF_EVENTS
 	select GENERIC_ATOMIC64 if !64BIT
-	select ARCH_HAS_ATOMIC64_DEC_IF_POSITIVE
 	select BROKEN_RODATA
 	select GENERIC_IRQ_PROBE
 	select GENERIC_PCI_IOMAP
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/Kconfig b/arch/powerpc/Kconfig
index 927d2ab2ce08..18d1b42cf545 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/powerpc/Kconfig
@@ -113,7 +113,6 @@  config PPC
 	select HAVE_DEBUG_KMEMLEAK
 	select ARCH_HAS_SG_CHAIN
 	select GENERIC_ATOMIC64 if PPC32
-	select ARCH_HAS_ATOMIC64_DEC_IF_POSITIVE
 	select HAVE_PERF_EVENTS
 	select HAVE_PERF_REGS
 	select HAVE_PERF_USER_STACK_DUMP
diff --git a/arch/s390/Kconfig b/arch/s390/Kconfig
index e751fe25d6ab..af52b07efde2 100644
--- a/arch/s390/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/s390/Kconfig
@@ -67,7 +67,6 @@  config DEBUG_RODATA
 
 config S390
 	def_bool y
-	select ARCH_HAS_ATOMIC64_DEC_IF_POSITIVE
 	select ARCH_HAS_DEBUG_STRICT_USER_COPY_CHECKS
 	select ARCH_HAS_DEVMEM_IS_ALLOWED
 	select ARCH_HAS_ELF_RANDOMIZE
diff --git a/arch/sparc/Kconfig b/arch/sparc/Kconfig
index 59b09600dd32..bfedbe0cb7b2 100644
--- a/arch/sparc/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/sparc/Kconfig
@@ -22,7 +22,6 @@  config SPARC
 	select HAVE_ARCH_TRACEHOOK
 	select HAVE_EXIT_THREAD
 	select SYSCTL_EXCEPTION_TRACE
-	select ARCH_HAS_ATOMIC64_DEC_IF_POSITIVE
 	select RTC_CLASS
 	select RTC_DRV_M48T59
 	select RTC_SYSTOHC
diff --git a/arch/tile/Kconfig b/arch/tile/Kconfig
index 4820a02838ac..12eda5440c93 100644
--- a/arch/tile/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/tile/Kconfig
@@ -3,7 +3,6 @@ 
 
 config TILE
 	def_bool y
-	select ARCH_HAS_ATOMIC64_DEC_IF_POSITIVE
 	select ARCH_HAS_DEBUG_STRICT_USER_COPY_CHECKS
 	select ARCH_HAS_DEVMEM_IS_ALLOWED
 	select ARCH_HAVE_NMI_SAFE_CMPXCHG
diff --git a/arch/x86/Kconfig b/arch/x86/Kconfig
index c580d8c33562..0cf609998550 100644
--- a/arch/x86/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/x86/Kconfig
@@ -23,7 +23,6 @@  config X86
 	select ARCH_CLOCKSOURCE_DATA
 	select ARCH_DISCARD_MEMBLOCK
 	select ARCH_HAS_ACPI_TABLE_UPGRADE if ACPI
-	select ARCH_HAS_ATOMIC64_DEC_IF_POSITIVE
 	select ARCH_HAS_DEBUG_STRICT_USER_COPY_CHECKS
 	select ARCH_HAS_DEVMEM_IS_ALLOWED
 	select ARCH_HAS_ELF_RANDOMIZE
diff --git a/lib/Kconfig b/lib/Kconfig
index d79909dc01ec..0e74df3c5441 100644
--- a/lib/Kconfig
+++ b/lib/Kconfig
@@ -457,9 +457,6 @@  config NLATTR
 config GENERIC_ATOMIC64
        bool
 
-config ARCH_HAS_ATOMIC64_DEC_IF_POSITIVE
-	def_bool y if GENERIC_ATOMIC64
-
 config LRU_CACHE
 	tristate
 
diff --git a/lib/atomic64_test.c b/lib/atomic64_test.c
index dbb369145dda..46042901130f 100644
--- a/lib/atomic64_test.c
+++ b/lib/atomic64_test.c
@@ -213,7 +213,6 @@  static __init void test_atomic64(void)
 	r += one;
 	BUG_ON(v.counter != r);
 
-#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_ATOMIC64_DEC_IF_POSITIVE
 	INIT(onestwos);
 	BUG_ON(atomic64_dec_if_positive(&v) != (onestwos - 1));
 	r -= one;
@@ -226,9 +225,6 @@  static __init void test_atomic64(void)
 	INIT(-one);
 	BUG_ON(atomic64_dec_if_positive(&v) != (-one - one));
 	BUG_ON(v.counter != r);
-#else
-#warning Please implement atomic64_dec_if_positive for your architecture and select the above Kconfig symbol
-#endif
 
 	INIT(onestwos);
 	BUG_ON(!atomic64_inc_not_zero(&v));