From patchwork Sat Apr 20 15:17:32 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Atish Kumar Patra X-Patchwork-Id: 1925762 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@legolas.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: legolas.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; secure) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=bombadil.20210309 header.b=HImtqYFz; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=rivosinc-com.20230601.gappssmtp.com header.i=@rivosinc-com.20230601.gappssmtp.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=20230601 header.b=2dlmWdQk; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: legolas.ozlabs.org; spf=none (no SPF record) smtp.mailfrom=lists.infradead.org (client-ip=2607:7c80:54:3::133; helo=bombadil.infradead.org; envelope-from=kvm-riscv-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.infradead.org; receiver=patchwork.ozlabs.org) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [IPv6:2607:7c80:54:3::133]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (secp384r1) server-digest SHA384) (No client certificate requested) by legolas.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4VLrvv60gdz1yZP for ; Sat, 20 Apr 2024 09:49:15 +1000 (AEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To: Message-Id:Date:Subject:Cc:To:From:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=svEneMBzUnlsgqlxPJIh8zRQLdP3fLK5vNhnf41oFI4=; b=HImtqYFzWKMKGE 6BGaOQC52cNxOYg5s3ei3U1UwtA7fgyQsJYWBRDhVP5mHPbY2Q7wqUviYNxlDK5nrupmLB1HjKzTq DWka8HpIr9wfNcPFWCxNr6HbOmFcIvkBMINK50TRbcGhIOUBzOEFGx0JGXRFnivxtV1BifzEt3Z6l kK5DcLKW3ieCWEnShURyi4TWkHKrYBWUeq03Oj++OoR09v6FY6IsUqVsWusFuSuNIhEeZnHbJtrQi l0TJ+QO88WNH7/mvaH6hjBR5guBd4yjvuq/qSjAkNFspZOtumCyr4Rdfn2ntSN31jkncFpc9DV75V QveFyL2KO7qOO06Dg2dg==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1rxxyk-00000007Ji9-09aY; Fri, 19 Apr 2024 23:49:14 +0000 Received: from mail-pl1-x62f.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::62f]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1rxxxo-00000007Isw-1DeK for kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 19 Apr 2024 23:48:21 +0000 Received: by mail-pl1-x62f.google.com with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-1e2bbc2048eso22760965ad.3 for ; Fri, 19 Apr 2024 16:48:14 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=rivosinc-com.20230601.gappssmtp.com; s=20230601; t=1713570494; x=1714175294; darn=lists.infradead.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=qvJukw934GuSrXeFuup9ak7dnmqxN0Lb+FQnvb7sFPo=; b=2dlmWdQkLrsNUMfsr5FCeT0K0v9vLbo2iVG3i6gJS+koGw1lgkFWjSc3nIxSrCoj9k FfMCSgUz5yMPUKOQEYKUAV3h2nfn/6mn6ILVU6KFD2wNRsf7WUKv8Vj/a2Wy43fYj2zg bA2LdnnKTSKBWsGY/Gb59aVIQSxAvahgxW8hVoWM/rFxozy4pCwXXhYj+DeAUKATr73f CqVURd9wLO5cUDmDNEbGzdzqPQtDcsomDrL+lNyvJonGBAQCKwymjpLk7FXQRB5wrNBG 73v9RBLnLyrN6+SjmfwexuQ06gc/Hbr0EyL6tnnwR+bdRqVFk+DBLGP58LksQahYQo3v LfTw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1713570494; x=1714175294; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=qvJukw934GuSrXeFuup9ak7dnmqxN0Lb+FQnvb7sFPo=; b=ttM3sJn1g0COHtuVHsf9lhg4HGd/nSTbjuH4ICfwxbmVJh/mM4dZ+jSQUx8uYl8K2L 1ViZxrUMCW73E27joDrIs4zTQLH61RYmekWqrUR966SZHgMGcJzKJiQHzAd6Fog/jJAn o/wQt1ldrOT3C30sEbnQosyGOULnMwl0w6HKV0G9y5cUOb0nGjP/lNT1MgaTHUrTAL3U Rk+GSfrIQsXTHzMY+dGN8LyhrEK92SfB6iLaeP4EuQD+Qv6Svs5PPUam20XozugSdA+Y 0AckJtpBMdFdUQv0Kt2IKhkSa9w02qzfgXWIm394Z9YZpGvt+zFl7EYc3kfSU3yXWn/J GNaA== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCV3iQda5ZTn6p+xlsw0ZLMYJXQ5aEJsO6A7ffNQXk6mvn2aqmmVF4MbapBdwK7tyDdvHA1iVQxIocsVcLPw3+68GQ7UOORaL+RLXIo0Yg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwOKeEcUry+NMZ+afTBioDH/4M01+/p+iDvUZavixId1vk+1QYP 95RWtn25ObKFRes5CIZLuaeumX229nh96vIDscfMpzlHfZ+iLXMw18gCKmm12WE= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHNOAevdCsO+x56Lrjstt6VQiieab73uI15/qneokBom5eDca9biRdG55Oycpz2lFWb0UW/7w== X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:e889:b0:1e5:3684:617e with SMTP id w9-20020a170902e88900b001e53684617emr4770983plg.52.1713570494026; Fri, 19 Apr 2024 16:48:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from atishp.ba.rivosinc.com ([64.71.180.162]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id w17-20020a170902d11100b001e42f215f33sm3924017plw.85.2024.04.19.16.48.12 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 19 Apr 2024 16:48:13 -0700 (PDT) From: Atish Patra To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Atish Patra , Andrew Jones , Ajay Kaher , Albert Ou , Alexandre Ghiti , Anup Patel , samuel.holland@sifive.com, Conor Dooley , Juergen Gross , kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, Mark Rutland , Palmer Dabbelt , Paolo Bonzini , Paul Walmsley , Shuah Khan , virtualization@lists.linux.dev, Will Deacon , x86@kernel.org Subject: [PATCH v8 16/24] RISC-V: KVM: Improve firmware counter read function Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2024 08:17:32 -0700 Message-Id: <20240420151741.962500-17-atishp@rivosinc.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.34.1 In-Reply-To: <20240420151741.962500-1-atishp@rivosinc.com> References: <20240420151741.962500-1-atishp@rivosinc.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20240419_164816_571128_71E1ED8C X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 12.18 ) X-Spam-Score: 2.5 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "bombadil.infradead.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Rename the function to indicate that it is meant for firmware counter read. While at it, add a range sanity check for it as well. Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones Signed-off-by: Atish Patra --- arch/riscv/include/asm/kvm_vcpu_pmu.h | 2 +- arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_pmu.c | 7 ++++++- arch/riscv/k [...] Content analysis details: (2.5 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [2607:f8b0:4864:20:0:0:0:62f listed in] [list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature 2.5 DATE_IN_FUTURE_12_24 Date: is 12 to 24 hours after Received: date X-BeenThere: kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "kvm-riscv" Errors-To: kvm-riscv-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.infradead.org Rename the function to indicate that it is meant for firmware counter read. While at it, add a range sanity check for it as well. Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones Signed-off-by: Atish Patra Reviewed-by: Anup Patel --- arch/riscv/include/asm/kvm_vcpu_pmu.h | 2 +- arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_pmu.c | 7 ++++++- arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_sbi_pmu.c | 2 +- 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/kvm_vcpu_pmu.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/kvm_vcpu_pmu.h index 55861b5d3382..fa0f535bbbf0 100644 --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/kvm_vcpu_pmu.h +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/kvm_vcpu_pmu.h @@ -89,7 +89,7 @@ int kvm_riscv_vcpu_pmu_ctr_cfg_match(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long ctr_ba unsigned long ctr_mask, unsigned long flags, unsigned long eidx, u64 evtdata, struct kvm_vcpu_sbi_return *retdata); -int kvm_riscv_vcpu_pmu_ctr_read(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long cidx, +int kvm_riscv_vcpu_pmu_fw_ctr_read(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long cidx, struct kvm_vcpu_sbi_return *retdata); int kvm_riscv_vcpu_pmu_fw_ctr_read_hi(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long cidx, struct kvm_vcpu_sbi_return *retdata); diff --git a/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_pmu.c b/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_pmu.c index e1409ec9afc0..04db1f993c47 100644 --- a/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_pmu.c +++ b/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_pmu.c @@ -235,6 +235,11 @@ static int pmu_ctr_read(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long cidx, u64 enabled, running; int fevent_code; + if (cidx >= kvm_pmu_num_counters(kvpmu) || cidx == 1) { + pr_warn("Invalid counter id [%ld] during read\n", cidx); + return -EINVAL; + } + pmc = &kvpmu->pmc[cidx]; if (pmc->cinfo.type == SBI_PMU_CTR_TYPE_FW) { @@ -747,7 +752,7 @@ int kvm_riscv_vcpu_pmu_fw_ctr_read_hi(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long cidx, return 0; } -int kvm_riscv_vcpu_pmu_ctr_read(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long cidx, +int kvm_riscv_vcpu_pmu_fw_ctr_read(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long cidx, struct kvm_vcpu_sbi_return *retdata) { int ret; diff --git a/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_sbi_pmu.c b/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_sbi_pmu.c index cf111de51bdb..e4be34e03e83 100644 --- a/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_sbi_pmu.c +++ b/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_sbi_pmu.c @@ -62,7 +62,7 @@ static int kvm_sbi_ext_pmu_handler(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run, ret = kvm_riscv_vcpu_pmu_ctr_stop(vcpu, cp->a0, cp->a1, cp->a2, retdata); break; case SBI_EXT_PMU_COUNTER_FW_READ: - ret = kvm_riscv_vcpu_pmu_ctr_read(vcpu, cp->a0, retdata); + ret = kvm_riscv_vcpu_pmu_fw_ctr_read(vcpu, cp->a0, retdata); break; case SBI_EXT_PMU_COUNTER_FW_READ_HI: if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_32BIT))