From patchwork Sun Feb 5 01:15:02 2023 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Atish Kumar Patra X-Patchwork-Id: 1737610 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@legolas.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: legolas.ozlabs.org; spf=none (no SPF record) smtp.mailfrom=lists.infradead.org (client-ip=2607:7c80:54:3::133; helo=bombadil.infradead.org; envelope-from=kvm-riscv-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.infradead.org; receiver=) Authentication-Results: legolas.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; secure) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=bombadil.20210309 header.b=IDQdYKP5; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=rivosinc-com.20210112.gappssmtp.com header.i=@rivosinc-com.20210112.gappssmtp.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=20210112 header.b=UWWqvu8e; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [IPv6:2607:7c80:54:3::133]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-384) server-digest SHA384) (No client certificate requested) by legolas.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4P8Y131Jp6z23hn for ; Sun, 5 Feb 2023 13:16:39 +1100 (AEDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To: Message-Id:Date:Subject:Cc:To:From:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=AL4GsCIoejXzDphkait9Pr0DCgWqBcinq1YdesqbAps=; b=IDQdYKP5pB6BHR 2wIijAXrL1FCas8y5Nb5vqB07jvBqG4Pow2EoXowgm1CVCbpX1WmZH1APLGZKq3Dz0HeCK1a3coaD 6vV6y77eCAUxdEQqltx9ZuG/Rt3MzKF/7tCipToSDyKsKk4y1xCUU+VvaQDX9xYKJZpqRxJffvYVe oyXWmZ8KlhqyjFEqUXlZsyVhsRamoQVRBrkM0t+KpqAueLtrNytigLzfTV11hqbRQlGudeu9T2Ue1 heMh9T5kEHwj+Ga8S3HxYBS17f5+uO9UdLrUDpj+1zJB28bpl3ffTgJzl9Gt9e68jlQai/XIx1paV 39kckZNRjaUOCvQC9M9A==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1pOUa4-005rcM-RM; Sun, 05 Feb 2023 02:16:36 +0000 Received: from mail-pl1-x632.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::632]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1pOTcs-005oCc-5E for kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org; Sun, 05 Feb 2023 01:15:30 +0000 Received: by mail-pl1-x632.google.com with SMTP id u9so4619107plf.3 for ; Sat, 04 Feb 2023 17:15:24 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=rivosinc-com.20210112.gappssmtp.com; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=svX9QoI7+pu9KPeMOFBJn1yDl6Mnh/aSAvVAOGuYZfA=; b=UWWqvu8ePBkTP/f/Im+K0H/bNL/4zKa4o1kI6YLXeiV/XRHxhnq/UqlTohNKQYSFfd m2UxfODelUBj4tsTSem8Ta5Um6OpE9jup1MJsc1vyMgbmWEMWodnGydA9Npw8rqoB3Nr zyQQzmAj10eUlrfRefLVvB8HXB+CVmvso7lp1k8XGnFcDQxrESBPR5vMhiUPN7et66eC E0/TWd/Qbctc9NzaDESSuyCAIrC3vglE0+oE9UrDJ+wJi52VhxA/FwMQhCFh/a+LEHM/ E+BC8uoYtypHLFQaNyX12aSHnxo1s5C9lt8NjtST+gBDTrBDiT59LguPB7YhM4WPOHAl rauQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=svX9QoI7+pu9KPeMOFBJn1yDl6Mnh/aSAvVAOGuYZfA=; b=LMTu9wfVCW5q8g+CY2BFYkwLVgqqiOuz1aI/XfK7r7N4EiUgYpCVLdiATPHQu6EZCX mCvxSaFoor3JKWTHELFSj8dFzZpEqZVFJnqTMjudhzTaKjPBuNHN1dNpn5M9Ew/wzO3f KoQM8bpN977j18i7SOUVjThIGDhsw284AF8/jwPVi5VCCDhjq/utE74Pw71d/aUB352U W+RS5haq08NU2hC5uLs+hGL2Bqh2UgzBDXIznM2pKUjBLS3HsSx8g9MA4Ejlig3TxcIv OOv9+z0PJ2K0uU/WfN1CFIUxJngVVRX81E+UOEUqqfPIp0303/DLbs7SRpRWoe2/64vt VRsw== X-Gm-Message-State: AO0yUKW7bpQMJQnVqn0qyxmpXZjPcaOMQ8SKyUMxxUEmSO5AMO5NWTfb md9lBGmMZWXKU0TUBw1XtstnBw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AK7set+Xyt5S9nTOhNQhOx6D8ZIswnKXzhNJjKsuo14bbUAnnbqzHvHmwnIDP5qP1M47Lk99is8gOw== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:4a4c:b0:226:c196:db55 with SMTP id lb12-20020a17090b4a4c00b00226c196db55mr16098855pjb.18.1675559723756; Sat, 04 Feb 2023 17:15:23 -0800 (PST) Received: from atishp.ba.rivosinc.com ([66.220.2.162]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id c7-20020a17090a020700b0023080c4c3bcsm2721917pjc.31.2023.02.04.17.15.22 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sat, 04 Feb 2023 17:15:23 -0800 (PST) From: Atish Patra To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Atish Patra , Anup Patel , Andrew Jones , Albert Ou , Atish Patra , Guo Ren , Heiko Stuebner , kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, Mark Rutland , Palmer Dabbelt , Paul Walmsley , Will Deacon Subject: [PATCH v5 01/14] perf: RISC-V: Define helper functions expose hpm counter width and count Date: Sat, 4 Feb 2023 17:15:02 -0800 Message-Id: <20230205011515.1284674-2-atishp@rivosinc.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.25.1 In-Reply-To: <20230205011515.1284674-1-atishp@rivosinc.com> References: <20230205011515.1284674-1-atishp@rivosinc.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20230204_171526_466555_3BCFE322 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 19.17 ) X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "bombadil.infradead.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: KVM module needs to know how many hardware counters and the counter width that the platform supports. Otherwise, it will not be able to show optimal value of virtual counters to the guest. The virtual [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [2607:f8b0:4864:20:0:0:0:632 listed in] [list.dnswl.org] -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid X-BeenThere: kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "kvm-riscv" Errors-To: kvm-riscv-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.infradead.org KVM module needs to know how many hardware counters and the counter width that the platform supports. Otherwise, it will not be able to show optimal value of virtual counters to the guest. The virtual hardware counters also need to have the same width as the logical hardware counters for simplicity. However, there shouldn't be mapping between virtual hardware counters and logical hardware counters. As we don't support hetergeneous harts or counters with different width as of now, the implementation relies on the counter width of the first available programmable counter. Reviewed-by: Anup Patel Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones Signed-off-by: Atish Patra --- drivers/perf/riscv_pmu_sbi.c | 37 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- include/linux/perf/riscv_pmu.h | 3 +++ 2 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/perf/riscv_pmu_sbi.c b/drivers/perf/riscv_pmu_sbi.c index f6507ef..6b53adc 100644 --- a/drivers/perf/riscv_pmu_sbi.c +++ b/drivers/perf/riscv_pmu_sbi.c @@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ static const struct attribute_group *riscv_pmu_attr_groups[] = { }; /* - * RISC-V doesn't have hetergenous harts yet. This need to be part of + * RISC-V doesn't have heterogeneous harts yet. This need to be part of * per_cpu in case of harts with different pmu counters */ static union sbi_pmu_ctr_info *pmu_ctr_list; @@ -52,6 +52,9 @@ static bool riscv_pmu_use_irq; static unsigned int riscv_pmu_irq_num; static unsigned int riscv_pmu_irq; +/* Cache the available counters in a bitmask */ +static unsigned long cmask; + struct sbi_pmu_event_data { union { union { @@ -267,6 +270,37 @@ static bool pmu_sbi_ctr_is_fw(int cidx) return (info->type == SBI_PMU_CTR_TYPE_FW) ? true : false; } +/* + * Returns the counter width of a programmable counter and number of hardware + * counters. As we don't support heterogeneous CPUs yet, it is okay to just + * return the counter width of the first programmable counter. + */ +int riscv_pmu_get_hpm_info(u32 *hw_ctr_width, u32 *num_hw_ctr) +{ + int i; + union sbi_pmu_ctr_info *info; + u32 hpm_width = 0, hpm_count = 0; + + if (!cmask) + return -EINVAL; + + for_each_set_bit(i, &cmask, RISCV_MAX_COUNTERS) { + info = &pmu_ctr_list[i]; + if (!info) + continue; + if (!hpm_width && info->csr != CSR_CYCLE && info->csr != CSR_INSTRET) + hpm_width = info->width; + if (info->type == SBI_PMU_CTR_TYPE_HW) + hpm_count++; + } + + *hw_ctr_width = hpm_width; + *num_hw_ctr = hpm_count; + + return 0; +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(riscv_pmu_get_hpm_info); + static int pmu_sbi_ctr_get_idx(struct perf_event *event) { struct hw_perf_event *hwc = &event->hw; @@ -812,7 +846,6 @@ static void riscv_pmu_destroy(struct riscv_pmu *pmu) static int pmu_sbi_device_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) { struct riscv_pmu *pmu = NULL; - unsigned long cmask = 0; int ret = -ENODEV; int num_counters; diff --git a/include/linux/perf/riscv_pmu.h b/include/linux/perf/riscv_pmu.h index e17e86a..a1c3f77 100644 --- a/include/linux/perf/riscv_pmu.h +++ b/include/linux/perf/riscv_pmu.h @@ -73,6 +73,9 @@ void riscv_pmu_legacy_skip_init(void); static inline void riscv_pmu_legacy_skip_init(void) {}; #endif struct riscv_pmu *riscv_pmu_alloc(void); +#ifdef CONFIG_RISCV_PMU_SBI +int riscv_pmu_get_hpm_info(u32 *hw_ctr_width, u32 *num_hw_ctr); +#endif #endif /* CONFIG_RISCV_PMU */