From patchwork Wed Nov 30 23:09:15 2022 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Sean Christopherson X-Patchwork-Id: 1710788 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@legolas.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: legolas.ozlabs.org; spf=none (no SPF record) smtp.mailfrom=lists.infradead.org (client-ip=2607:7c80:54:3::133; helo=bombadil.infradead.org; envelope-from=kvm-riscv-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.infradead.org; receiver=) Authentication-Results: legolas.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; secure) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=bombadil.20210309 header.b=DbpEkPby; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; secure) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=casper.20170209 header.b=nrPWeFup; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=google.com header.i=@google.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=20210112 header.b=fV1/K+jF; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [IPv6:2607:7c80:54:3::133]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-384) server-digest SHA384) (No client certificate requested) by legolas.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4NMx8f4l66z23nS for ; Thu, 1 Dec 2022 11:02:26 +1100 (AEDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Reply-To:List-Subscribe:List-Help: List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Cc:To:From:Subject:Message-ID :References:Mime-Version:In-Reply-To:Date:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=yOhPkJIMFvWLZ/AVyLc54axO/IKCFsqjq6y/SN0ymVw=; b=DbpEkPby4EaYdf tym/v02JC1O3xvvmq/1l1Kqd4UYVK86qvY297tKTRxvioEMveLmVhcFrtafznEBiPkfQdKYgcvKAC jWSuG1RRzSn61S8AfubZjsaiA0rISJNTkoezRTrESXgUScDObdabCRdTz4ogVZltcUtQ8eZv8rtG0 j8B2OBr7nV2sl6PxgiVvm3hR/kM8+VKnQp9/FOO+4lz+NDnw16jeafsuqZp5aSbMecOGqaa6/1kBf h8stFTYwr7houoPQpTGmkdJVUz3MRU28lj82Jl35JfitX9JXm/314LiXXBz2i6CZzbyTkIoz+533u oiMi9xTEDoiO1aS4ARIg==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1p0X1y-003SdA-4Y; Thu, 01 Dec 2022 00:02:22 +0000 Received: from casper.infradead.org ([2001:8b0:10b:1236::1]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1p0WbY-003Gqn-Fz for kvm-riscv@bombadil.infradead.org; Wed, 30 Nov 2022 23:35:04 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=casper.20170209; h=Content-Type:Cc:To:From:Subject: Message-ID:References:Mime-Version:In-Reply-To:Date:Reply-To:Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=gGlMYVi+8cq5eUoZ5sdih51J8dbFvJ7SNZIQRLoo5uo=; b=nrPWeFupRLPHJ5OZsLYQSEq+Us 4z41KsezNA6HlbgDiiCY6/g4eWG5QH1KDVOWKsFX8Oh340tzS4Zst9dFYxz/gAp7dA3/R4KLtzEBv X2ZTG/KEqfKf9EXHjllc502m3JQt/jg4O7MlQFZDYhMrxpmFyZfwdqn99rKZn4k6LvGrFxsfEY0MI 46l7HqF/J4vSP+SMVzsWAJhUnllaFBo7KOUZ3yfeuKxPv5D5HICC2uMTZ5iOAFLfpZOhqX9A2zAO+ PqQg9UXmxW9+AYshpITA7uLsbl3GDCpwouZorimdOKta136QWXU7hSgqtko/oGUcQ63/GbzrSuGBh QjqPalFA==; Received: from mail-pg1-f202.google.com ([209.85.215.202]) by casper.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1p0WE1-00FPvi-VI for kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 30 Nov 2022 23:10:48 +0000 Received: by mail-pg1-f202.google.com with SMTP id s21-20020a63ff55000000b00477f5ae7320so61445pgk.18 for ; Wed, 30 Nov 2022 15:10:33 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20210112; h=cc:to:from:subject:message-id:references:mime-version:in-reply-to :date:reply-to:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=gGlMYVi+8cq5eUoZ5sdih51J8dbFvJ7SNZIQRLoo5uo=; b=fV1/K+jF8pmsrix+k0p4fqdMLOZW46RiubsdWwI2sgpOZ9mSf0o8kQB+E0gdgHGg9/ eAw8H+6GYUyvY58pud7hGaMaECg17r4h3ufqi+AQiO/cd2K2PsiQx/t0E+ow2b29O1kq mE9Nc5EOzaOOCFpHTdWVwQd3VK8VqaamiQrK4JT5brdDF2lU7pSMAn1NZk1aO9R2/+nZ HvMEU0WPaG/hIKRtGO8ZlmpBj18ocxONAB+T3MZL6DtiiV1jniXaBXq2MSSMS+Eff7NV 6zujBbiUfcV5uJuTUyGLRufJIGyZXhMyG5dt8JA41iQvZmB19fSGzEz6eLd/dvmJ66Ev FrGA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=cc:to:from:subject:message-id:references:mime-version:in-reply-to :date:reply-to:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=gGlMYVi+8cq5eUoZ5sdih51J8dbFvJ7SNZIQRLoo5uo=; b=ql2eWfRD9rO3j7/2CBkIBr4IXF2QZ+DU1c2AWpVS2Z+rBD1QAQiKKH8FdkXSpeOiR7 nJTJ/aGxEwSSZv1Pe+ASH7GxClZKC3WDmfYmn8qu0+RHYeG6PsZsvI583KDLk0e8xo3x p8NdZrd59yu+MWY5jLiULbMsr76YXislQxYaowDcDXsD5z6thTxIRJQv5wL7j7fYXC7q SjPkAUcYqgzSdyetDfdyqQxwlGTB1x4iwxONZWV8PwZW9pOxfF3FSIVxEoHoQC5Pb6bJ 3JjnXxYyTTC+o/7ut1htlru14y/isZzcqRZgGjlKCIEiBbLq1QQ6sL2w23R9GyVavvNl bmXQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ANoB5pnHSfduOc0ppL6DsbiebS4cBZ7EiCbrYwOw1oGvv5SgndAatv5V bMyISohD6XFnwkS3yuz3rzVIOhAIZec= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA0mqf7tkua9h/cWBirbpjwcNsrjWIz0JrBzEezpRIm7lfNzo4PInvRMnHehpz73z+PXMVC4o8EwEkWCrGc= X-Received: from zagreus.c.googlers.com ([fda3:e722:ac3:cc00:7f:e700:c0a8:5c37]) (user=seanjc job=sendgmr) by 2002:aa7:8bc1:0:b0:575:bfb9:b1fa with SMTP id s1-20020aa78bc1000000b00575bfb9b1famr7675712pfd.62.1669849831189; Wed, 30 Nov 2022 15:10:31 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2022 23:09:15 +0000 In-Reply-To: <20221130230934.1014142-1-seanjc@google.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 References: <20221130230934.1014142-1-seanjc@google.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.38.1.584.g0f3c55d4c2-goog Message-ID: <20221130230934.1014142-32-seanjc@google.com> Subject: [PATCH v2 31/50] KVM: x86: Do CPU compatibility checks in x86 code From: Sean Christopherson To: Paolo Bonzini , Marc Zyngier , Huacai Chen , Aleksandar Markovic , Anup Patel , Paul Walmsley , Palmer Dabbelt , Albert Ou , Christian Borntraeger , Janosch Frank , Claudio Imbrenda , Matthew Rosato , Eric Farman , Sean Christopherson , Vitaly Kuznetsov , David Woodhouse , Paul Durrant Cc: James Morse , Alexandru Elisei , Suzuki K Poulose , Oliver Upton , Atish Patra , David Hildenbrand , kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Yuan Yao , Cornelia Huck , Isaku Yamahata , " =?utf-8?q?Philippe_Mathieu-Da?= =?utf-8?q?ud=C3=A9?= " , Fabiano Rosas , Michael Ellerman , Kai Huang , Chao Gao , Thomas Gleixner X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20221130_231046_023233_77BFB6FD X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 14.32 ) X-Spam-Score: -9.6 (---------) X-Spam-Report: SpamAssassin version 3.4.6 on casper.infradead.org summary: Content analysis details: (-9.6 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [209.85.215.202 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3 RBL: Good reputation (+3) [209.85.215.202 listed in wl.mailspike.net] 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -7.5 USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL From: address is in the default DKIM welcome-list 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID_EF Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature 0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL Mailspike good senders -0.0 DKIMWL_WL_MED DKIMwl.org - Medium trust sender X-BeenThere: kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Sean Christopherson Sender: "kvm-riscv" Errors-To: kvm-riscv-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.infradead.org Move the CPU compatibility checks to pure x86 code, i.e. drop x86's use of the common kvm_x86_check_cpu_compat() arch hook. x86 is the only architecture that "needs" to do per-CPU compatibility checks, moving the logic to x86 will allow dropping the common code, and will also give x86 more control over when/how the compatibility checks are performed, e.g. TDX will need to enable hardware (do VMXON) in order to perform compatibility checks. Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson Reviewed-by: Kai Huang Reviewed-by: Isaku Yamahata --- arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c | 2 +- arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c | 2 +- arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 49 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------- 3 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c index 19e81a99c58f..d7ea1c1175c2 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c @@ -5103,7 +5103,7 @@ static int __init svm_init(void) * Common KVM initialization _must_ come last, after this, /dev/kvm is * exposed to userspace! */ - r = kvm_init(&svm_init_ops, sizeof(struct vcpu_svm), + r = kvm_init(NULL, sizeof(struct vcpu_svm), __alignof__(struct vcpu_svm), THIS_MODULE); if (r) goto err_kvm_init; diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c index 654d81f781da..8deb1bd60c10 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c @@ -8592,7 +8592,7 @@ static int __init vmx_init(void) * Common KVM initialization _must_ come last, after this, /dev/kvm is * exposed to userspace! */ - r = kvm_init(&vmx_init_ops, sizeof(struct vcpu_vmx), + r = kvm_init(NULL, sizeof(struct vcpu_vmx), __alignof__(struct vcpu_vmx), THIS_MODULE); if (r) goto err_kvm_init; diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c index 66f16458aa97..3571bc968cf8 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c @@ -9277,10 +9277,36 @@ static inline void kvm_ops_update(struct kvm_x86_init_ops *ops) kvm_pmu_ops_update(ops->pmu_ops); } +struct kvm_cpu_compat_check { + struct kvm_x86_init_ops *ops; + int *ret; +}; + +static int kvm_x86_check_processor_compatibility(struct kvm_x86_init_ops *ops) +{ + struct cpuinfo_x86 *c = &cpu_data(smp_processor_id()); + + WARN_ON(!irqs_disabled()); + + if (__cr4_reserved_bits(cpu_has, c) != + __cr4_reserved_bits(cpu_has, &boot_cpu_data)) + return -EIO; + + return ops->check_processor_compatibility(); +} + +static void kvm_x86_check_cpu_compat(void *data) +{ + struct kvm_cpu_compat_check *c = data; + + *c->ret = kvm_x86_check_processor_compatibility(c->ops); +} + static int __kvm_x86_vendor_init(struct kvm_x86_init_ops *ops) { + struct kvm_cpu_compat_check c; u64 host_pat; - int r; + int r, cpu; if (kvm_x86_ops.hardware_enable) { pr_err("kvm: already loaded vendor module '%s'\n", kvm_x86_ops.name); @@ -9360,6 +9386,14 @@ static int __kvm_x86_vendor_init(struct kvm_x86_init_ops *ops) if (r != 0) goto out_mmu_exit; + c.ret = &r; + c.ops = ops; + for_each_online_cpu(cpu) { + smp_call_function_single(cpu, kvm_x86_check_cpu_compat, &c, 1); + if (r < 0) + goto out_hardware_unsetup; + } + /* * Point of no return! DO NOT add error paths below this point unless * absolutely necessary, as most operations from this point forward @@ -9402,6 +9436,8 @@ static int __kvm_x86_vendor_init(struct kvm_x86_init_ops *ops) kvm_init_msr_list(); return 0; +out_hardware_unsetup: + ops->runtime_ops->hardware_unsetup(); out_mmu_exit: kvm_mmu_vendor_module_exit(); out_free_percpu: @@ -12037,16 +12073,7 @@ void kvm_arch_hardware_disable(void) int kvm_arch_check_processor_compat(void *opaque) { - struct cpuinfo_x86 *c = &cpu_data(smp_processor_id()); - struct kvm_x86_init_ops *ops = opaque; - - WARN_ON(!irqs_disabled()); - - if (__cr4_reserved_bits(cpu_has, c) != - __cr4_reserved_bits(cpu_has, &boot_cpu_data)) - return -EIO; - - return ops->check_processor_compatibility(); + return 0; } bool kvm_vcpu_is_reset_bsp(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)