diff mbox series

[v6,18/22] KVM: x86/mmu: Extend make_huge_page_split_spte() for the shadow MMU

Message ID 20220516232138.1783324-19-dmatlack@google.com
State Accepted
Headers show
Series KVM: Extend Eager Page Splitting to the shadow MMU | expand

Commit Message

David Matlack May 16, 2022, 11:21 p.m. UTC 
Currently make_huge_page_split_spte() assumes execute permissions can be
granted to any 4K SPTE when splitting huge pages. This is true for the
TDP MMU but is not necessarily true for the shadow MMU, since KVM may be
shadowing a non-executable huge page.

To fix this, pass in the role of the child shadow page where the huge
page will be split and derive the execution permission from that.  This
is correct because huge pages are always split with direct shadow page
and thus the shadow page role contains the correct access permissions.

No functional change intended.

Signed-off-by: David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>
---
 arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.c    | 16 ++++++++--------
 arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.h    |  2 +-
 arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c |  2 +-
 3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

Comments

Sean Christopherson June 17, 2022, 4:56 p.m. UTC | #1 
On Mon, May 16, 2022, David Matlack wrote:
> Currently make_huge_page_split_spte() assumes execute permissions can be
> granted to any 4K SPTE when splitting huge pages. This is true for the
> TDP MMU but is not necessarily true for the shadow MMU, since KVM may be
> shadowing a non-executable huge page.
> 
> To fix this, pass in the role of the child shadow page where the huge
> page will be split and derive the execution permission from that.  This
> is correct because huge pages are always split with direct shadow page
> and thus the shadow page role contains the correct access permissions.
> 
> No functional change intended.
> 
> Signed-off-by: David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>
> ---

Reviewed-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.c
index b5960bbde7f7..237e8dc12993 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.c
@@ -244,10 +244,10 @@  static u64 make_spte_executable(u64 spte)
  * This is used during huge page splitting to build the SPTEs that make up the
  * new page table.
  */
-u64 make_huge_page_split_spte(u64 huge_spte, int huge_level, int index)
+u64 make_huge_page_split_spte(u64 huge_spte, union kvm_mmu_page_role role,
+			      int index)
 {
 	u64 child_spte;
-	int child_level;
 
 	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!is_shadow_present_pte(huge_spte)))
 		return 0;
@@ -256,23 +256,23 @@  u64 make_huge_page_split_spte(u64 huge_spte, int huge_level, int index)
 		return 0;
 
 	child_spte = huge_spte;
-	child_level = huge_level - 1;
 
 	/*
 	 * The child_spte already has the base address of the huge page being
 	 * split. So we just have to OR in the offset to the page at the next
 	 * lower level for the given index.
 	 */
-	child_spte |= (index * KVM_PAGES_PER_HPAGE(child_level)) << PAGE_SHIFT;
+	child_spte |= (index * KVM_PAGES_PER_HPAGE(role.level)) << PAGE_SHIFT;
 
-	if (child_level == PG_LEVEL_4K) {
+	if (role.level == PG_LEVEL_4K) {
 		child_spte &= ~PT_PAGE_SIZE_MASK;
 
 		/*
-		 * When splitting to a 4K page, mark the page executable as the
-		 * NX hugepage mitigation no longer applies.
+		 * When splitting to a 4K page where execution is allowed, mark
+		 * the page executable as the NX hugepage mitigation no longer
+		 * applies.
 		 */
-		if (is_nx_huge_page_enabled())
+		if ((role.access & ACC_EXEC_MASK) && is_nx_huge_page_enabled())
 			child_spte = make_spte_executable(child_spte);
 	}
 
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.h b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.h
index 0127bb6e3c7d..3dada44cc066 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.h
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.h
@@ -425,7 +425,7 @@  bool make_spte(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_mmu_page *sp,
 	       unsigned int pte_access, gfn_t gfn, kvm_pfn_t pfn,
 	       u64 old_spte, bool prefetch, bool can_unsync,
 	       bool host_writable, u64 *new_spte);
-u64 make_huge_page_split_spte(u64 huge_spte, int huge_level, int index);
+u64 make_huge_page_split_spte(u64 huge_spte, union kvm_mmu_page_role role, int index);
 u64 make_nonleaf_spte(u64 *child_pt, bool ad_disabled);
 u64 make_mmio_spte(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 gfn, unsigned int access);
 u64 mark_spte_for_access_track(u64 spte);
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
index 841feaa48be5..a5472ee56080 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
@@ -1488,7 +1488,7 @@  static int tdp_mmu_split_huge_page(struct kvm *kvm, struct tdp_iter *iter,
 	 * not been linked in yet and thus is not reachable from any other CPU.
 	 */
 	for (i = 0; i < PT64_ENT_PER_PAGE; i++)
-		sp->spt[i] = make_huge_page_split_spte(huge_spte, level, i);
+		sp->spt[i] = make_huge_page_split_spte(huge_spte, sp->role, i);
 
 	/*
 	 * Replace the huge spte with a pointer to the populated lower level