@@ -85,7 +85,7 @@ static unsigned long kvm_psci_vcpu_on(struct kvm_vcpu *source_vcpu)
if (!vcpu)
return PSCI_RET_INVALID_PARAMS;
if (!vcpu->arch.power_off) {
- if (kvm_psci_version(source_vcpu, kvm) != KVM_ARM_PSCI_0_1)
+ if (kvm_psci_version(source_vcpu) != KVM_ARM_PSCI_0_1)
return PSCI_RET_ALREADY_ON;
else
return PSCI_RET_INVALID_PARAMS;
@@ -392,7 +392,7 @@ static int kvm_psci_0_1_call(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
*/
int kvm_psci_call(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
{
- switch (kvm_psci_version(vcpu, vcpu->kvm)) {
+ switch (kvm_psci_version(vcpu)) {
case KVM_ARM_PSCI_1_0:
return kvm_psci_1_0_call(vcpu);
case KVM_ARM_PSCI_0_2:
@@ -471,7 +471,7 @@ int kvm_arm_get_fw_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct kvm_one_reg *reg)
switch (reg->id) {
case KVM_REG_ARM_PSCI_VERSION:
- val = kvm_psci_version(vcpu, vcpu->kvm);
+ val = kvm_psci_version(vcpu);
break;
case KVM_REG_ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_WORKAROUND_1:
case KVM_REG_ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_WORKAROUND_2:
@@ -16,11 +16,7 @@
#define KVM_ARM_PSCI_LATEST KVM_ARM_PSCI_1_0
-/*
- * We need the KVM pointer independently from the vcpu as we can call
- * this from HYP, and need to apply kern_hyp_va on it...
- */
-static inline int kvm_psci_version(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm *kvm)
+static inline int kvm_psci_version(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
{
/*
* Our PSCI implementation stays the same across versions from