diff mbox series

[v3,02/52] powerpc/64s: guard optional TIDR SPR with CPU ftr test

Message ID 20211004160049.1338837-3-npiggin@gmail.com
State New
Headers show
Series KVM: PPC: Book3S HV P9: entry/exit optimisations | expand

Commit Message

Nicholas Piggin Oct. 4, 2021, 3:59 p.m. UTC
The TIDR SPR only exists on POWER9. Avoid accessing it when the
feature bit for it is not set.

Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
---
 arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c | 12 ++++++++----
 arch/powerpc/xmon/xmon.c     | 10 ++++++++--
 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

Comments

Fabiano Rosas Oct. 11, 2021, 6:44 p.m. UTC | #1
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> writes:

> The TIDR SPR only exists on POWER9. Avoid accessing it when the
> feature bit for it is not set.

Not related to this patch, but how does this work with compat mode? A P9
compat mode guest would get an invalid instruction when trying to access
this SPR?

> Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>

Reviewed-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com>

> ---
>  arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c | 12 ++++++++----
>  arch/powerpc/xmon/xmon.c     | 10 ++++++++--
>  2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c
> index 2acb1c96cfaf..f4a779fffd18 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c
> @@ -3767,7 +3767,8 @@ static void load_spr_state(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  	mtspr(SPRN_EBBHR, vcpu->arch.ebbhr);
>  	mtspr(SPRN_EBBRR, vcpu->arch.ebbrr);
>  	mtspr(SPRN_BESCR, vcpu->arch.bescr);
> -	mtspr(SPRN_TIDR, vcpu->arch.tid);
> +	if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_P9_TIDR))
> +		mtspr(SPRN_TIDR, vcpu->arch.tid);
>  	mtspr(SPRN_AMR, vcpu->arch.amr);
>  	mtspr(SPRN_UAMOR, vcpu->arch.uamor);
>
> @@ -3793,7 +3794,8 @@ static void store_spr_state(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  	vcpu->arch.ebbhr = mfspr(SPRN_EBBHR);
>  	vcpu->arch.ebbrr = mfspr(SPRN_EBBRR);
>  	vcpu->arch.bescr = mfspr(SPRN_BESCR);
> -	vcpu->arch.tid = mfspr(SPRN_TIDR);
> +	if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_P9_TIDR))
> +		vcpu->arch.tid = mfspr(SPRN_TIDR);
>  	vcpu->arch.amr = mfspr(SPRN_AMR);
>  	vcpu->arch.uamor = mfspr(SPRN_UAMOR);
>  	vcpu->arch.dscr = mfspr(SPRN_DSCR);
> @@ -3813,7 +3815,8 @@ struct p9_host_os_sprs {
>  static void save_p9_host_os_sprs(struct p9_host_os_sprs *host_os_sprs)
>  {
>  	host_os_sprs->dscr = mfspr(SPRN_DSCR);
> -	host_os_sprs->tidr = mfspr(SPRN_TIDR);
> +	if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_P9_TIDR))
> +		host_os_sprs->tidr = mfspr(SPRN_TIDR);
>  	host_os_sprs->iamr = mfspr(SPRN_IAMR);
>  	host_os_sprs->amr = mfspr(SPRN_AMR);
>  	host_os_sprs->fscr = mfspr(SPRN_FSCR);
> @@ -3827,7 +3830,8 @@ static void restore_p9_host_os_sprs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>  	mtspr(SPRN_UAMOR, 0);
>
>  	mtspr(SPRN_DSCR, host_os_sprs->dscr);
> -	mtspr(SPRN_TIDR, host_os_sprs->tidr);
> +	if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_P9_TIDR))
> +		mtspr(SPRN_TIDR, host_os_sprs->tidr);
>  	mtspr(SPRN_IAMR, host_os_sprs->iamr);
>
>  	if (host_os_sprs->amr != vcpu->arch.amr)
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/xmon/xmon.c b/arch/powerpc/xmon/xmon.c
> index dd8241c009e5..7958e5aae844 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/xmon/xmon.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/xmon/xmon.c
> @@ -2107,8 +2107,14 @@ static void dump_300_sprs(void)
>  	if (!cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_300))
>  		return;
>
> -	printf("pidr   = %.16lx  tidr  = %.16lx\n",
> -		mfspr(SPRN_PID), mfspr(SPRN_TIDR));
> +	if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_P9_TIDR)) {
> +		printf("pidr   = %.16lx  tidr  = %.16lx\n",
> +			mfspr(SPRN_PID), mfspr(SPRN_TIDR));
> +	} else {
> +		printf("pidr   = %.16lx\n",
> +			mfspr(SPRN_PID));
> +	}
> +
>  	printf("psscr  = %.16lx\n",
>  		hv ? mfspr(SPRN_PSSCR) : mfspr(SPRN_PSSCR_PR));
Michael Ellerman Oct. 12, 2021, 2:08 a.m. UTC | #2
Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com> writes:
> Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> The TIDR SPR only exists on POWER9. Avoid accessing it when the
>> feature bit for it is not set.
>
> Not related to this patch, but how does this work with compat mode? A P9
> compat mode guest would get an invalid instruction when trying to access
> this SPR?

Good question.

I assume you're talking about P9 compat mode on P10.

In general compat mode only applies to userspace, because it's
implemented by setting the PCR which only (mostly?) applies to PR=1.

I don't think there's any special casing in the ISA for the TIDR, so I
think it just falls into the unimplemented SPR case for mt/fspr.

That's documented in Book III section 5.4.4, in particular on page 1171
it says:

  Execution of this instruction specifying an SPR number
  that is undefined for the implementation causes one of
  the following.
  • if spr[0]=0:
    - if MSR[PR]=1: Hypervisor Emulation Assistance interrupt
    - if MSR[PR]=0: Hypervisor Emulation Assistance interrupt for SPR
      0,4,5, and 6, and no operation (i.e., the instruction is treated
      as a no-op) when LPCR[EVIRT]=0 and Hypervisor Emulation Assistance
      interrupt when LPCR[EVIRT]=1 for all other SPRs

Linux doesn't set EVIRT, and I assume neither does phyp, so it behaves
like a nop.

We actually use that behaviour in xmon to detect that an SPR is not
implemented, by noticing that the mfspr has no effect on the target
register, see dump_one_spr().

We should really write some docs on compat mode in the linuxppc wiki
and/or Documentation ;)

cheers
Fabiano Rosas Oct. 13, 2021, 4:51 p.m. UTC | #3
Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> writes:

> Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com> writes:
>> Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> writes:
>>
>>> The TIDR SPR only exists on POWER9. Avoid accessing it when the
>>> feature bit for it is not set.
>>
>> Not related to this patch, but how does this work with compat mode? A P9
>> compat mode guest would get an invalid instruction when trying to access
>> this SPR?
>
> Good question.
>
> I assume you're talking about P9 compat mode on P10.
>
> In general compat mode only applies to userspace, because it's
> implemented by setting the PCR which only (mostly?) applies to PR=1.
>
> I don't think there's any special casing in the ISA for the TIDR, so I
> think it just falls into the unimplemented SPR case for mt/fspr.
>
> That's documented in Book III section 5.4.4, in particular on page 1171
> it says:
>
>   Execution of this instruction specifying an SPR number
>   that is undefined for the implementation causes one of
>   the following.
>   • if spr[0]=0:
>     - if MSR[PR]=1: Hypervisor Emulation Assistance interrupt
>     - if MSR[PR]=0: Hypervisor Emulation Assistance interrupt for SPR
>       0,4,5, and 6, and no operation (i.e., the instruction is treated
>       as a no-op) when LPCR[EVIRT]=0 and Hypervisor Emulation Assistance
>       interrupt when LPCR[EVIRT]=1 for all other SPRs

I knew this must have been somewhere in there but had no idea how to
find it. Thanks.

> Linux doesn't set EVIRT, and I assume neither does phyp, so it behaves
> like a nop.
>
> We actually use that behaviour in xmon to detect that an SPR is not
> implemented, by noticing that the mfspr has no effect on the target
> register, see dump_one_spr().
>
> We should really write some docs on compat mode in the linuxppc wiki
> and/or Documentation ;)

Hmm I was not aware we had a wiki. I'll see if I can contribute
something. I need to go learn all this stuff first, though =D.

>
> cheers
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c
index 2acb1c96cfaf..f4a779fffd18 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c
@@ -3767,7 +3767,8 @@  static void load_spr_state(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 	mtspr(SPRN_EBBHR, vcpu->arch.ebbhr);
 	mtspr(SPRN_EBBRR, vcpu->arch.ebbrr);
 	mtspr(SPRN_BESCR, vcpu->arch.bescr);
-	mtspr(SPRN_TIDR, vcpu->arch.tid);
+	if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_P9_TIDR))
+		mtspr(SPRN_TIDR, vcpu->arch.tid);
 	mtspr(SPRN_AMR, vcpu->arch.amr);
 	mtspr(SPRN_UAMOR, vcpu->arch.uamor);
 
@@ -3793,7 +3794,8 @@  static void store_spr_state(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 	vcpu->arch.ebbhr = mfspr(SPRN_EBBHR);
 	vcpu->arch.ebbrr = mfspr(SPRN_EBBRR);
 	vcpu->arch.bescr = mfspr(SPRN_BESCR);
-	vcpu->arch.tid = mfspr(SPRN_TIDR);
+	if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_P9_TIDR))
+		vcpu->arch.tid = mfspr(SPRN_TIDR);
 	vcpu->arch.amr = mfspr(SPRN_AMR);
 	vcpu->arch.uamor = mfspr(SPRN_UAMOR);
 	vcpu->arch.dscr = mfspr(SPRN_DSCR);
@@ -3813,7 +3815,8 @@  struct p9_host_os_sprs {
 static void save_p9_host_os_sprs(struct p9_host_os_sprs *host_os_sprs)
 {
 	host_os_sprs->dscr = mfspr(SPRN_DSCR);
-	host_os_sprs->tidr = mfspr(SPRN_TIDR);
+	if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_P9_TIDR))
+		host_os_sprs->tidr = mfspr(SPRN_TIDR);
 	host_os_sprs->iamr = mfspr(SPRN_IAMR);
 	host_os_sprs->amr = mfspr(SPRN_AMR);
 	host_os_sprs->fscr = mfspr(SPRN_FSCR);
@@ -3827,7 +3830,8 @@  static void restore_p9_host_os_sprs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 	mtspr(SPRN_UAMOR, 0);
 
 	mtspr(SPRN_DSCR, host_os_sprs->dscr);
-	mtspr(SPRN_TIDR, host_os_sprs->tidr);
+	if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_P9_TIDR))
+		mtspr(SPRN_TIDR, host_os_sprs->tidr);
 	mtspr(SPRN_IAMR, host_os_sprs->iamr);
 
 	if (host_os_sprs->amr != vcpu->arch.amr)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/xmon/xmon.c b/arch/powerpc/xmon/xmon.c
index dd8241c009e5..7958e5aae844 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/xmon/xmon.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/xmon/xmon.c
@@ -2107,8 +2107,14 @@  static void dump_300_sprs(void)
 	if (!cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_300))
 		return;
 
-	printf("pidr   = %.16lx  tidr  = %.16lx\n",
-		mfspr(SPRN_PID), mfspr(SPRN_TIDR));
+	if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_P9_TIDR)) {
+		printf("pidr   = %.16lx  tidr  = %.16lx\n",
+			mfspr(SPRN_PID), mfspr(SPRN_TIDR));
+	} else {
+		printf("pidr   = %.16lx\n",
+			mfspr(SPRN_PID));
+	}
+
 	printf("psscr  = %.16lx\n",
 		hv ? mfspr(SPRN_PSSCR) : mfspr(SPRN_PSSCR_PR));