| Message ID | 1333143304-27495-1-git-send-email-greearb@candelatech.com |
|---|---|
| State | Accepted |
| Commit | f115560c21db876be8a6272f389c02034eccbdcb |
| Headers | show |
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 02:35:04PM -0700, greearb@candelatech.com wrote: > Without this, we can get into a tight loop because the > code in general doesn't add eloop exception handlers, > so socket reporting the POLLERR would never be read. > > With this change, any socket with POLLERR or POLLHUP > asserted will be handled by the read logic. Thanks, applied.
diff --git a/src/utils/eloop.c b/src/utils/eloop.c index 5691f15..9f64314 100644 --- a/src/utils/eloop.c +++ b/src/utils/eloop.c @@ -350,7 +350,7 @@ static void eloop_sock_table_dispatch(struct eloop_sock_table *readers, int max_pollfd_map) { if (eloop_sock_table_dispatch_table(readers, pollfds_map, - max_pollfd_map, POLLIN)) + max_pollfd_map, POLLIN | POLLERR | POLLHUP)) return; /* pollfds may be invalid at this point */ if (eloop_sock_table_dispatch_table(writers, pollfds_map,
From: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com> Without this, we can get into a tight loop because the code in general doesn't add eloop exception handlers, so socket reporting the POLLERR would never be read. With this change, any socket with POLLERR or POLLHUP asserted will be handled by the read logic. Signed-hostap: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com> --- :100644 100644 5691f15... 9f64314... M src/utils/eloop.c src/utils/eloop.c | 2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)