Message ID | mvmsgo1q758.fsf@suse.de |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
Series | ldconfig: handle .dynstr located in separate segment (bug 25087) | expand |
* Andreas Schwab: > + && dyn_entry->d_un.d_val < segment->p_vaddr + segment->p_filesz) > + dynamic_strings = (char *) (file_contents + dyn_entry->d_un.d_val - loadoff); I think these lines are too long. I also suspect that the condition should be written as dyn_entry->d_un.d_val - segment->p_vaddr < segment->p_filesz But in principle, the change looks fine. Is it possible to write a test case for bug 25087? Thanks, Florian
On Okt 16 2019, Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com> wrote: > * Andreas Schwab: > >> + && dyn_entry->d_un.d_val < segment->p_vaddr + segment->p_filesz) > >> + dynamic_strings = (char *) (file_contents + dyn_entry->d_un.d_val - loadoff); > > I think these lines are too long. I also suspect that the condition > should be written as > > dyn_entry->d_un.d_val - segment->p_vaddr < segment->p_filesz Ok. > Is it possible to write a test case for bug 25087? The broken layout is created by patchelf, but I have no idea how to replicate it without that. Andreas.
* Andreas Schwab: > On Okt 16 2019, Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com> wrote: > >> * Andreas Schwab: >> >>> + && dyn_entry->d_un.d_val < segment->p_vaddr + segment->p_filesz) >> >>> + dynamic_strings = (char *) (file_contents + dyn_entry->d_un.d_val - loadoff); >> >> I think these lines are too long. I also suspect that the condition >> should be written as >> >> dyn_entry->d_un.d_val - segment->p_vaddr < segment->p_filesz > > Ok. > >> Is it possible to write a test case for bug 25087? > > The broken layout is created by patchelf, but I have no idea how to > replicate it without that. I guess in this case, checking this in without a regression test is fine. Thanks, Florian
diff --git a/elf/readelflib.c b/elf/readelflib.c index 09f5858426..23a045a582 100644 --- a/elf/readelflib.c +++ b/elf/readelflib.c @@ -45,7 +45,6 @@ process_elf_file (const char *file_name, const char *lib, int *flag, { int i; unsigned int j; - ElfW(Addr) loadaddr; unsigned int dynamic_addr; size_t dynamic_size; char *program_interpreter; @@ -87,7 +86,6 @@ process_elf_file (const char *file_name, const char *lib, int *flag, libc5/libc6. */ *flag = FLAG_ELF; - loadaddr = -1; dynamic_addr = 0; dynamic_size = 0; program_interpreter = NULL; @@ -98,11 +96,6 @@ process_elf_file (const char *file_name, const char *lib, int *flag, switch (segment->p_type) { - case PT_LOAD: - if (loadaddr == (ElfW(Addr)) -1) - loadaddr = segment->p_vaddr - segment->p_offset; - break; - case PT_DYNAMIC: if (dynamic_addr) error (0, 0, _("more than one dynamic segment\n")); @@ -176,11 +169,6 @@ process_elf_file (const char *file_name, const char *lib, int *flag, } } - if (loadaddr == (ElfW(Addr)) -1) - { - /* Very strange. */ - loadaddr = 0; - } /* Now we can read the dynamic sections. */ if (dynamic_size == 0) @@ -197,7 +185,27 @@ process_elf_file (const char *file_name, const char *lib, int *flag, check_ptr (dyn_entry); if (dyn_entry->d_tag == DT_STRTAB) { - dynamic_strings = (char *) (file_contents + dyn_entry->d_un.d_val - loadaddr); + /* Find the file offset of the segment containing the dynamic + string table. */ + ElfW(Off) loadoff = -1; + for (i = 0, segment = elf_pheader; + i < elf_header->e_phnum; i++, segment++) + { + if (segment->p_type == PT_LOAD + && dyn_entry->d_un.d_val >= segment->p_vaddr + && dyn_entry->d_un.d_val < segment->p_vaddr + segment->p_filesz) + { + loadoff = segment->p_vaddr - segment->p_offset; + break; + } + } + if (loadoff == (ElfW(Off)) -1) + { + /* Very strange. */ + loadoff = 0; + } + + dynamic_strings = (char *) (file_contents + dyn_entry->d_un.d_val - loadoff); check_ptr (dynamic_strings); break; }