| Message ID | 56A000F8.4030507@redhat.com |
|---|---|
| State | New |
| Headers | show |
On Wed, 20 Jan 2016, Florian Weimer wrote:
> This patch adds the recent CVE assignments to the NEWS file.
What happened to this patch - why hasn't it been committed? We're very
close to the release now, and this is a release blocker.
On 02/17/2016 06:18 PM, Joseph Myers wrote: > On Wed, 20 Jan 2016, Florian Weimer wrote: > >> This patch adds the recent CVE assignments to the NEWS file. > > What happened to this patch - why hasn't it been committed? We're very > close to the release now, and this is a release blocker. I'm just following the rule that all patches during the hard freeze have to be approved by the release manager. Florian
On Wed, 17 Feb 2016, Florian Weimer wrote: > On 02/17/2016 06:18 PM, Joseph Myers wrote: > > On Wed, 20 Jan 2016, Florian Weimer wrote: > > > >> This patch adds the recent CVE assignments to the NEWS file. > > > > What happened to this patch - why hasn't it been committed? We're very > > close to the release now, and this is a release blocker. > > I'm just following the rule that all patches during the hard freeze have > to be approved by the release manager. I don't think that should apply to NEWS updates. More generally, has anyone reviewed the changes since 2.22 for any significant non-bug-fix changes that ought to have NEWS entries but don't?
On 17-02-2016 15:27, Joseph Myers wrote: > On Wed, 17 Feb 2016, Florian Weimer wrote: > >> On 02/17/2016 06:18 PM, Joseph Myers wrote: >>> On Wed, 20 Jan 2016, Florian Weimer wrote: >>> >>>> This patch adds the recent CVE assignments to the NEWS file. >>> >>> What happened to this patch - why hasn't it been committed? We're very >>> close to the release now, and this is a release blocker. >> >> I'm just following the rule that all patches during the hard freeze have >> to be approved by the release manager. > > I don't think that should apply to NEWS updates. This is also my understanding since the patches itself is upstream (although some wording/spelling corrections may apply). > > More generally, has anyone reviewed the changes since 2.22 for any > significant non-bug-fix changes that ought to have NEWS entries but don't? > Good question, I will check this out.
diff --git a/NEWS b/NEWS index 93c09be..9158bfe 100644 --- a/NEWS +++ b/NEWS @@ -47,9 +47,6 @@ Version 2.23 tzselect). This is useful for people who build the timezone data and code independent of the GNU C Library. -* The LD_POINTER_GUARD environment variable can no longer be used to - disable the pointer guard feature. It is always enabled. - * The obsolete header <regexp.h> has been removed. Programs that require this header must be updated to use <regex.h> instead. @@ -75,9 +72,24 @@ Version 2.23 Security related changes: +* An out-of-bounds value in a broken-out struct tm argument to strftime no + longer causes a crash. Reported by Adam Nielsen. (CVE-2015-8776) + +* The LD_POINTER_GUARD environment variable can no longer be used to disable + the pointer guard feature. It is always enabled. Previously, + LD_POINTER_GUARD could be used to disable security hardening in binaries + running in privileged AT_SECURE mode. Reported by Hector Marco-Gisbert. + (CVE-2015-8777) + +* An integer overflow in hcreate and hcreate_r could lead to an + out-of-bounds memory access. Reported by Szabolcs Nagy. (CVE-2015-8778) + +* The catopen function no longer has unbounded stack usage. Reported by + Max. (CVE-2015-8779) + * The nan, nanf and nanl functions no longer have unbounded stack usage depending on the length of the string passed as an argument to the - functions. Reported by Joseph Myers. + functions. Reported by Joseph Myers. (CVE-2014-9761) * The following bugs are resolved with this release: