[v7,2/3] x86: Add bounds `x86_non_temporal_threshold`

The lower-bound (16448) and upper-bound (SIZE_MAX / 16) are assumed
by memmove-vec-unaligned-erms.

The lower-bound is needed because memmove-vec-unaligned-erms unrolls
the loop aggressively in the L(large_memset_4x) case.

The upper-bound is needed because memmove-vec-unaligned-erms
right-shifts the value of `x86_non_temporal_threshold` by
LOG_4X_MEMCPY_THRESH (4) which without a bound may overflow.

The lack of lower-bound can be a correctness issue. The lack of
upper-bound cannot.
---
 manual/tunables.texi       | 2 +-
 sysdeps/x86/dl-cacheinfo.h | 8 +++++++-
 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

On Wed, Jun 15, 2022 at 1:34 PM Noah Goldstein <goldstein.w.n@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> The lower-bound (16448) and upper-bound (SIZE_MAX / 16) are assumed
> by memmove-vec-unaligned-erms.
>
> The lower-bound is needed because memmove-vec-unaligned-erms unrolls
> the loop aggressively in the L(large_memset_4x) case.
>
> The upper-bound is needed because memmove-vec-unaligned-erms
> right-shifts the value of `x86_non_temporal_threshold` by
> LOG_4X_MEMCPY_THRESH (4) which without a bound may overflow.
>
> The lack of lower-bound can be a correctness issue. The lack of
> upper-bound cannot.
> ---
>  manual/tunables.texi       | 2 +-
>  sysdeps/x86/dl-cacheinfo.h | 8 +++++++-
>  2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/manual/tunables.texi b/manual/tunables.texi
> index 1482412078..2c076019ae 100644
> --- a/manual/tunables.texi
> +++ b/manual/tunables.texi
> @@ -47,7 +47,7 @@ glibc.malloc.mxfast: 0x0 (min: 0x0, max: 0xffffffffffffffff)
>  glibc.elision.skip_lock_busy: 3 (min: -2147483648, max: 2147483647)
>  glibc.malloc.top_pad: 0x0 (min: 0x0, max: 0xffffffffffffffff)
>  glibc.cpu.x86_rep_stosb_threshold: 0x800 (min: 0x1, max: 0xffffffffffffffff)
> -glibc.cpu.x86_non_temporal_threshold: 0xc0000 (min: 0x0, max: 0xffffffffffffffff)
> +glibc.cpu.x86_non_temporal_threshold: 0xc0000 (min: 0x4040, max: 0x0fffffffffffffff)
>  glibc.cpu.x86_shstk:
>  glibc.cpu.hwcap_mask: 0x6 (min: 0x0, max: 0xffffffffffffffff)
>  glibc.malloc.mmap_max: 0 (min: -2147483648, max: 2147483647)
> diff --git a/sysdeps/x86/dl-cacheinfo.h b/sysdeps/x86/dl-cacheinfo.h
> index cc3b840f9c..e9f3382108 100644
> --- a/sysdeps/x86/dl-cacheinfo.h
> +++ b/sysdeps/x86/dl-cacheinfo.h
> @@ -931,8 +931,14 @@ dl_init_cacheinfo (struct cpu_features *cpu_features)
>
>    TUNABLE_SET_WITH_BOUNDS (x86_data_cache_size, data, 0, SIZE_MAX);
>    TUNABLE_SET_WITH_BOUNDS (x86_shared_cache_size, shared, 0, SIZE_MAX);
> +  /* SIZE_MAX >> 4 because memmove-vec-unaligned-erms right-shifts the value of
> +     'x86_non_temporal_threshold' by `LOG_4X_MEMCPY_THRESH` (4) and it is best
> +     if that operation cannot overflow. Minimum of 0x4040 (16448) because the
> +     L(large_memset_4x) loops need 64-byte to cache align and enough space for
> +     at least 1 iteration of 4x PAGE_SIZE unrolled loop.  Both values are
> +     reflected in the manual.  */
>    TUNABLE_SET_WITH_BOUNDS (x86_non_temporal_threshold, non_temporal_threshold,
> -                          0, SIZE_MAX);
> +                          0x4040, SIZE_MAX >> 4);
>    TUNABLE_SET_WITH_BOUNDS (x86_rep_movsb_threshold, rep_movsb_threshold,
>                            minimum_rep_movsb_threshold, SIZE_MAX);
>    TUNABLE_SET_WITH_BOUNDS (x86_rep_stosb_threshold, rep_stosb_threshold, 1,
> --
> 2.34.1
>

LGTM.

Thanks.

On Wed, Jun 15, 2022 at 1:49 PM H.J. Lu via Libc-alpha
<libc-alpha@sourceware.org> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jun 15, 2022 at 1:34 PM Noah Goldstein <goldstein.w.n@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > The lower-bound (16448) and upper-bound (SIZE_MAX / 16) are assumed
> > by memmove-vec-unaligned-erms.
> >
> > The lower-bound is needed because memmove-vec-unaligned-erms unrolls
> > the loop aggressively in the L(large_memset_4x) case.
> >
> > The upper-bound is needed because memmove-vec-unaligned-erms
> > right-shifts the value of `x86_non_temporal_threshold` by
> > LOG_4X_MEMCPY_THRESH (4) which without a bound may overflow.
> >
> > The lack of lower-bound can be a correctness issue. The lack of
> > upper-bound cannot.
> > ---
> >  manual/tunables.texi       | 2 +-
> >  sysdeps/x86/dl-cacheinfo.h | 8 +++++++-
> >  2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/manual/tunables.texi b/manual/tunables.texi
> > index 1482412078..2c076019ae 100644
> > --- a/manual/tunables.texi
> > +++ b/manual/tunables.texi
> > @@ -47,7 +47,7 @@ glibc.malloc.mxfast: 0x0 (min: 0x0, max: 0xffffffffffffffff)
> >  glibc.elision.skip_lock_busy: 3 (min: -2147483648, max: 2147483647)
> >  glibc.malloc.top_pad: 0x0 (min: 0x0, max: 0xffffffffffffffff)
> >  glibc.cpu.x86_rep_stosb_threshold: 0x800 (min: 0x1, max: 0xffffffffffffffff)
> > -glibc.cpu.x86_non_temporal_threshold: 0xc0000 (min: 0x0, max: 0xffffffffffffffff)
> > +glibc.cpu.x86_non_temporal_threshold: 0xc0000 (min: 0x4040, max: 0x0fffffffffffffff)
> >  glibc.cpu.x86_shstk:
> >  glibc.cpu.hwcap_mask: 0x6 (min: 0x0, max: 0xffffffffffffffff)
> >  glibc.malloc.mmap_max: 0 (min: -2147483648, max: 2147483647)
> > diff --git a/sysdeps/x86/dl-cacheinfo.h b/sysdeps/x86/dl-cacheinfo.h
> > index cc3b840f9c..e9f3382108 100644
> > --- a/sysdeps/x86/dl-cacheinfo.h
> > +++ b/sysdeps/x86/dl-cacheinfo.h
> > @@ -931,8 +931,14 @@ dl_init_cacheinfo (struct cpu_features *cpu_features)
> >
> >    TUNABLE_SET_WITH_BOUNDS (x86_data_cache_size, data, 0, SIZE_MAX);
> >    TUNABLE_SET_WITH_BOUNDS (x86_shared_cache_size, shared, 0, SIZE_MAX);
> > +  /* SIZE_MAX >> 4 because memmove-vec-unaligned-erms right-shifts the value of
> > +     'x86_non_temporal_threshold' by `LOG_4X_MEMCPY_THRESH` (4) and it is best
> > +     if that operation cannot overflow. Minimum of 0x4040 (16448) because the
> > +     L(large_memset_4x) loops need 64-byte to cache align and enough space for
> > +     at least 1 iteration of 4x PAGE_SIZE unrolled loop.  Both values are
> > +     reflected in the manual.  */
> >    TUNABLE_SET_WITH_BOUNDS (x86_non_temporal_threshold, non_temporal_threshold,
> > -                          0, SIZE_MAX);
> > +                          0x4040, SIZE_MAX >> 4);
> >    TUNABLE_SET_WITH_BOUNDS (x86_rep_movsb_threshold, rep_movsb_threshold,
> >                            minimum_rep_movsb_threshold, SIZE_MAX);
> >    TUNABLE_SET_WITH_BOUNDS (x86_rep_stosb_threshold, rep_stosb_threshold, 1,
> > --
> > 2.34.1
> >
>
> LGTM.
>
> Thanks.
>
> --
> H.J.

I would like to backport this patch to release branches.
Any comments or objections?

--Sunil